Hazards and Population Mapper
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 135 keywords for Hazards and Population Mapper in Apple App Store
Hazards and Population Mapper tracks 135 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 135 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 48.6, difficulty 39.6.
Tracked keywords
135
0 ranked • 135 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
48.6
Top keyword: free
Avg difficulty
39.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 89.9
free
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 2,147
- 88.7
time
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,805
- 70.9
health
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 307
- 67.9
version
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 182
- 77.7
support
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 515
Unranked opportunities
free
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.5 • Competitors: 2,147
time
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Competitors: 1,805
health
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.3 • Competitors: 307
version
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.6 • Competitors: 182
support
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.8 • Competitors: 515
High competition keywords
free
Total apps: 9,480 • Major competitors: 2,147
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.5
time
Total apps: 8,391 • Major competitors: 1,805
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.9
using
Total apps: 4,473 • Major competitors: 924
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.4
including
Total apps: 3,880 • Major competitors: 926
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.0
designed
Total apps: 3,407 • Major competitors: 624
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| free | 59 | 100 | 63 | 90 9,480 competing apps Median installs: 264,750 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 2,147 major competitor apps |
| health | 58 | 100 | 51 | 71 1,361 competing apps Median installs: 248,675 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 307 major competitor apps |
| version | 58 | 100 | 46 | 68 1,006 competing apps Median installs: 238,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 182 major competitor apps |
| support | 58 | 100 | 56 | 78 2,741 competing apps Median installs: 233,950 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 515 major competitor apps |
| users | 58 | 100 | 52 | 75 1,979 competing apps Median installs: 259,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 430 major competitor apps |
| active | 58 | 100 | 48 | 70 1,226 competing apps Median installs: 266,075 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 268 major competitor apps |
| interest | 20 | 100 | 55 | 56 291 competing apps Median installs: 263,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 73 major competitor apps |
| information | 58 | 100 | 57 | 78 2,704 competing apps Median installs: 252,888 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 572 major competitor apps |
| used | 58 | 100 | 53 | 72 1,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,800 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 279 major competitor apps |
| designed | 58 | 100 | 54 | 80 3,407 competing apps Median installs: 230,000 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 624 major competitor apps |
| using | 58 | 100 | 61 | 83 4,473 competing apps Median installs: 247,200 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 924 major competitor apps |
| include | 58 | 100 | 45 | 64 693 competing apps Median installs: 243,825 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 152 major competitor apps |
| service | 58 | 100 | 54 | 75 2,023 competing apps Median installs: 255,675 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 419 major competitor apps |
| time | 59 | 100 | 63 | 89 8,391 competing apps Median installs: 259,600 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,805 major competitor apps |
| international | 58 | 100 | 53 | 62 549 competing apps Median installs: 271,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 113 major competitor apps |
| variety | 58 | 100 | 52 | 75 2,160 competing apps Median installs: 261,825 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 480 major competitor apps |
| event | 58 | 100 | 45 | 60 442 competing apps Median installs: 277,238 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 99 major competitor apps |
| including | 58 | 100 | 62 | 81 3,880 competing apps Median installs: 285,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 926 major competitor apps |
| obtain | 57 | 100 | 46 | 52 189 competing apps Median installs: 228,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 36 major competitor apps |
| various | 58 | 100 | 50 | 75 2,177 competing apps Median installs: 229,325 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 374 major competitor apps |
| services | 58 | 100 | 54 | 69 1,093 competing apps Median installs: 293,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 272 major competitor apps |
| explore | 58 | 100 | 61 | 79 3,030 competing apps Median installs: 275,988 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 711 major competitor apps |
| students | 57 | 100 | 38 | 54 253 competing apps Median installs: 213,650 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 38 major competitor apps |
| around | 58 | 100 | 60 | 78 2,784 competing apps Median installs: 275,088 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 645 major competitor apps |
| others | 58 | 100 | 47 | 64 698 competing apps Median installs: 281,575 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 158 major competitor apps |
App Description
Developed by the NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC) operated by the Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN) at Columbia University, HazPop combines data and map layers from various sources including NASA's Land, Atmosphere Near real-time Capability for EOS (LANCE) and Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), and others using a variety of open Web mapping services. The custom population estimates are provided by the SEDAC Population Estimation Service (PES) based on SEDAC′s Gridded Population of the World, version 4 (GPWv4) data for 2015.
HazPop is designed to be used by disaster risk managers, humanitarian response organizations, public health professionals, journalists, and others needing a quick assessment of the potential dangers posed by a major hazardous event or developing emergency. For example, a disaster response agency can obtain a rough estimate of the population and major facilities near a recent earthquake as an input into response planning. Journalists or students can explore the location of recent wildfires relative to dense populations, roads, terrain, and water bodies. Due to the coarse resolution and varying quality of some of the data, HazPop is not intended to support in-depth risk assessment or location-specific response needs.
HazPop supports a number of other functions including: Monitoring regions around an area of interest, e.g. hazardous area prone to natural disasters, major infrastructure, or densely populated areas; Sorting dams, nuclear power plants, or earthquakes by proximity to your location or by their characteristics; Determining the distance from your location to any point on