Thermochemistry
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 71 keywords for Thermochemistry in Apple App Store
Thermochemistry tracks 71 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 71 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.0, difficulty 38.5.
Tracked keywords
71
0 ranked • 71 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.0
Top keyword: changes
Avg difficulty
38.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.5
changes
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 203
- 64.4
flow
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 87
- 68.0
calculate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 89
- 63.4
pressure
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 105
- 68.7
energy
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 176
Unranked opportunities
changes
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Competitors: 203
flow
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 87
calculate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 89
pressure
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 105
energy
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Competitors: 176
High competition keywords
way
Total apps: 115,772 • Major competitors: 1,944
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.3
take
Total apps: 95,116 • Major competitors: 1,732
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.2
provides
Total apps: 72,500 • Major competitors: 565
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.2
helps
Total apps: 56,203 • Major competitors: 614
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.4
system
Total apps: 45,812 • Major competitors: 413
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 47.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| change | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 40,805 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 780 major competitor apps |
| changes | 73 | 100 | 44 | 69 13,199 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 203 major competitor apps |
| section | 72 | 100 | 42 | 69 14,184 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 121 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 115,772 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,944 major competitor apps |
| added | 71 | 100 | 45 | 71 19,831 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 401 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 28,699 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 231 major competitor apps |
| take | 67 | 100 | 52 | 83 95,116 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,732 major competitor apps |
| provides | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 72,500 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 565 major competitor apps |
| flow | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 7,458 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 87 major competitor apps |
| units | 72 | 100 | 38 | 61 4,840 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 58 major competitor apps |
| calculate | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 12,281 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 89 major competitor apps |
| required | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 18,702 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 235 major competitor apps |
| pressure | 73 | 100 | 39 | 63 6,480 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 105 major competitor apps |
| show | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 36,184 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 710 major competitor apps |
| constant | 72 | 100 | 40 | 60 4,121 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 58 major competitor apps |
| energy | 73 | 100 | 42 | 69 13,591 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 176 major competitor apps |
| final | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 8,275 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 102 major competitor apps |
| points | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 25,824 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 491 major competitor apps |
| phase | 71 | 100 | 34 | 56 2,210 competing apps Median installs: 477 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 34 major competitor apps |
| equilibrium | 66 | 100 | 20 | 32 81 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| positive | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,222 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 117 major competitor apps |
| amount | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 10,966 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 186 major competitor apps |
| would | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 21,338 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 352 major competitor apps |
| advantage | 73 | 100 | 42 | 65 7,993 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 183 major competitor apps |
| take advantage | 72 | 100 | 38 | 59 3,783 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 93 major competitor apps |
App Description
App provides enthalpy values for each step. Negative enthalpy points to exothermic process – heat release, while positive one to endothermic - heat absorption. °C and K are interchangeable.
Calorimetry section provides means for evaluation of the heat capacity of calorimeter and for finding equilibrium temperature of mixed system. Forward arrow button sets the final temperature of the mixture. Backward arrow button sets missing temperature or heat capacity of one of the components. Enthalpy values show heat flow for each component.
Example of problems solved by application (screenshots):
Problem 1: Calculate the amount of energy required to change 100.0 g of ice at -15.0 °C to steam at 125.0 °C. Known values:
Heat of melting = 334.16 J g¯1
Heat of vaporization = 2259 J g¯1
specific heat capacity for solid water (ice) = 2.06 J g¯1 K¯1
specific heat capacity for liquid water = 4.184 J g¯1 K¯1
specific heat capacity for gaseous water (steam) = 2.02 J g¯1K¯1
Solution:
1) Heating of 100.0 g of ice from -15.0°C to 0.0°C:
(100.0 g) (15.0 K) (2.06 J g¯1 K¯1) = 3090 J
2) Melting of 100.0 g of ice:
(100.0 g) (334.16 J g¯1) = 33416 J
3) Heating of 100.0 g of liquid water from zero to 100.0 Celsius:
(100.0 g) (100.0 K) (4.184 J g¯1 K¯1) = 41840 J
4) Evaporations of 100.0 g of liquid:
(100.0 g) (2259 J g¯1) = 225900 J
5) Heating of 100.0 g of steam from 100.0 to 125.0 Celsius:
(100.0 g) (25.0 K) (2.02 J g¯1 K¯1) = 5050 J
6) Summation of the results:
3090 + 33416 + 41840 + 225900 + 5050 = 309.3 kJ
Problem 2: Determine the heat capacity of a coffee-cup calorimeter. During calibration 100.0 g of water at 58.5 °C has been added to 100.0 g of water, already in the calorimeter, at 22.8 °C. Calculate the heat capacity of the calorimeter in J/°C, if final temperature of the water is 39.7 °C. (Specific heat of water is 4.184 J/g °C.)
Solution:
1) Heat given up by warm water:
q = (100.0 g) (18.8 °C) (4.184 J/g °C) = 7865.92 J
2) Heat absorbed by water in the calorimeter:
q = (100.0 g) (16.9 °C) (4.184 J/g °C) = 7070.96 J
3) The difference was absorbed by the calorimeter:
7865.92 - 7070.96 = 794.96 J
4) Calorimeter constant:
794.96 J / 1