Thermochemistry
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 71 keywords for Thermochemistry in Apple App Store
Thermochemistry tracks 71 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 71 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.8, difficulty 37.2.
Tracked keywords
71
0 ranked • 71 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.8
Top keyword: flow
Avg difficulty
37.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.8
flow
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 44
- 67.7
calculate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 44
- 68.3
energy
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 78
- 64.8
final
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 51
- 66.4
positive
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 52
Unranked opportunities
flow
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Competitors: 44
calculate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 44
energy
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 78
final
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Competitors: 51
positive
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Competitors: 52
High competition keywords
way
Total apps: 106,332 • Major competitors: 1,093
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.0
take
Total apps: 96,173 • Major competitors: 969
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.5
provides
Total apps: 73,171 • Major competitors: 272
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.0
helps
Total apps: 57,269 • Major competitors: 341
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.1
system
Total apps: 40,718 • Major competitors: 176
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 46.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| change | 69 | 100 | 46 | 77 38,434 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 413 major competitor apps |
| changes | 72 | 100 | 42 | 69 13,391 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 127 major competitor apps |
| section | 72 | 100 | 42 | 69 13,272 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 62 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 51 | 84 106,332 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,093 major competitor apps |
| added | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 20,066 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 231 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 44 | 74 25,646 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 116 major competitor apps |
| take | 67 | 100 | 50 | 83 96,173 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 969 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 49 | 81 73,171 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 272 major competitor apps |
| flow | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 6,502 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 44 major competitor apps |
| units | 72 | 100 | 37 | 62 4,900 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 22 major competitor apps |
| calculate | 73 | 100 | 41 | 68 11,085 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 44 major competitor apps |
| required | 71 | 100 | 43 | 72 18,955 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 124 major competitor apps |
| pressure | 72 | 100 | 38 | 63 5,718 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 64 major competitor apps |
| show | 69 | 100 | 46 | 76 36,583 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 409 major competitor apps |
| constant | 72 | 100 | 36 | 60 3,715 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 31 major competitor apps |
| energy | 73 | 100 | 41 | 68 11,978 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 78 major competitor apps |
| final | 73 | 100 | 39 | 65 7,459 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 51 major competitor apps |
| points | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 26,070 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 277 major competitor apps |
| phase | 71 | 100 | 33 | 55 1,963 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 15 major competitor apps |
| equilibrium | 66 | 100 | 19 | 32 83 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| positive | 73 | 100 | 40 | 66 9,272 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 52 major competitor apps |
| amount | 73 | 100 | 41 | 68 11,066 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 97 major competitor apps |
| would | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 21,506 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 170 major competitor apps |
| advantage | 73 | 100 | 39 | 65 7,483 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 98 major competitor apps |
| take advantage | 72 | 100 | 37 | 60 3,823 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 49 major competitor apps |
App Description
App provides enthalpy values for each step. Negative enthalpy points to exothermic process – heat release, while positive one to endothermic - heat absorption. °C and K are interchangeable.
Calorimetry section provides means for evaluation of the heat capacity of calorimeter and for finding equilibrium temperature of mixed system. Forward arrow button sets the final temperature of the mixture. Backward arrow button sets missing temperature or heat capacity of one of the components. Enthalpy values show heat flow for each component.
Example of problems solved by application (screenshots):
Problem 1: Calculate the amount of energy required to change 100.0 g of ice at -15.0 °C to steam at 125.0 °C. Known values:
Heat of melting = 334.16 J g¯1
Heat of vaporization = 2259 J g¯1
specific heat capacity for solid water (ice) = 2.06 J g¯1 K¯1
specific heat capacity for liquid water = 4.184 J g¯1 K¯1
specific heat capacity for gaseous water (steam) = 2.02 J g¯1K¯1
Solution:
1) Heating of 100.0 g of ice from -15.0°C to 0.0°C:
(100.0 g) (15.0 K) (2.06 J g¯1 K¯1) = 3090 J
2) Melting of 100.0 g of ice:
(100.0 g) (334.16 J g¯1) = 33416 J
3) Heating of 100.0 g of liquid water from zero to 100.0 Celsius:
(100.0 g) (100.0 K) (4.184 J g¯1 K¯1) = 41840 J
4) Evaporations of 100.0 g of liquid:
(100.0 g) (2259 J g¯1) = 225900 J
5) Heating of 100.0 g of steam from 100.0 to 125.0 Celsius:
(100.0 g) (25.0 K) (2.02 J g¯1 K¯1) = 5050 J
6) Summation of the results:
3090 + 33416 + 41840 + 225900 + 5050 = 309.3 kJ
Problem 2: Determine the heat capacity of a coffee-cup calorimeter. During calibration 100.0 g of water at 58.5 °C has been added to 100.0 g of water, already in the calorimeter, at 22.8 °C. Calculate the heat capacity of the calorimeter in J/°C, if final temperature of the water is 39.7 °C. (Specific heat of water is 4.184 J/g °C.)
Solution:
1) Heat given up by warm water:
q = (100.0 g) (18.8 °C) (4.184 J/g °C) = 7865.92 J
2) Heat absorbed by water in the calorimeter:
q = (100.0 g) (16.9 °C) (4.184 J/g °C) = 7070.96 J
3) The difference was absorbed by the calorimeter:
7865.92 - 7070.96 = 794.96 J
4) Calorimeter constant:
794.96 J / 1