Thermochemistry
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 71 keywords for Thermochemistry in Apple App Store
Thermochemistry tracks 71 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 71 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 49.8, difficulty 37.0.
Tracked keywords
71
0 ranked • 71 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
49.8
Top keyword: way
Avg difficulty
37.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 83.0
way
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,067
- 83.4
take
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,068
- 73.9
change
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 400
- 62.0
changes
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 138
- 69.2
added
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 48.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 248
Unranked opportunities
way
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.3 • Competitors: 1,067
take
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Competitors: 1,068
change
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.7 • Competitors: 400
changes
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Competitors: 138
added
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 48.5 • Competitors: 248
High competition keywords
take
Total apps: 4,876 • Major competitors: 1,068
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.6
way
Total apps: 4,665 • Major competitors: 1,067
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.3
show
Total apps: 1,889 • Major competitors: 446
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.4
change
Total apps: 1,855 • Major competitors: 400
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7
provides
Total apps: 1,846 • Major competitors: 308
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| change | 58 | 100 | 54 | 74 1,855 competing apps Median installs: 267,450 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 400 major competitor apps |
| changes | 58 | 100 | 49 | 62 553 competing apps Median installs: 258,975 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 138 major competitor apps |
| section | 57 | 100 | 39 | 57 318 competing apps Median installs: 234,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 62 major competitor apps |
| way | 59 | 100 | 60 | 83 4,665 competing apps Median installs: 271,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,067 major competitor apps |
| added | 58 | 100 | 49 | 69 1,150 competing apps Median installs: 269,450 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 248 major competitor apps |
| process | 58 | 100 | 45 | 63 624 competing apps Median installs: 224,238 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 122 major competitor apps |
| take | 59 | 100 | 60 | 83 4,876 competing apps Median installs: 260,038 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,068 major competitor apps |
| provides | 58 | 100 | 49 | 74 1,846 competing apps Median installs: 221,075 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 308 major competitor apps |
| flow | 57 | 100 | 37 | 53 230 competing apps Median installs: 235,462 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 37 major competitor apps |
| units | 57 | 100 | 34 | 51 188 competing apps Median installs: 220,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 26 major competitor apps |
| calculate | 57 | 100 | 39 | 52 203 competing apps Median installs: 194,625 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 41 major competitor apps |
| required | 58 | 100 | 51 | 64 665 competing apps Median installs: 263,050 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 143 major competitor apps |
| pressure | 57 | 100 | 38 | 54 253 competing apps Median installs: 218,975 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 56 major competitor apps |
| show | 58 | 100 | 55 | 74 1,889 competing apps Median installs: 281,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 446 major competitor apps |
| constant | 57 | 100 | 40 | 49 145 competing apps Median installs: 259,175 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 29 major competitor apps |
| energy | 57 | 100 | 40 | 59 411 competing apps Median installs: 237,250 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 68 major competitor apps |
| final | 57 | 100 | 38 | 55 274 competing apps Median installs: 241,688 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 50 major competitor apps |
| points | 58 | 100 | 55 | 70 1,245 competing apps Median installs: 288,325 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 308 major competitor apps |
| phase | 57 | 100 | 29 | 41 66 competing apps Median installs: 212,300 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 15 major competitor apps |
| equilibrium | 0 | 26 | 12 | 14 3 competing apps Median installs: 244,950 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| positive | 57 | 100 | 39 | 56 298 competing apps Median installs: 236,112 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 50 major competitor apps |
| amount | 58 | 100 | 53 | 61 504 competing apps Median installs: 248,888 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 116 major competitor apps |
| would | 58 | 100 | 45 | 68 1,007 competing apps Median installs: 244,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 186 major competitor apps |
| advantage | 57 | 100 | 48 | 59 390 competing apps Median installs: 285,388 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 97 major competitor apps |
| take advantage | 20 | 100 | 47 | 53 218 competing apps Median installs: 285,800 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 59 major competitor apps |
App Description
App provides enthalpy values for each step. Negative enthalpy points to exothermic process – heat release, while positive one to endothermic - heat absorption. °C and K are interchangeable.
Calorimetry section provides means for evaluation of the heat capacity of calorimeter and for finding equilibrium temperature of mixed system. Forward arrow button sets the final temperature of the mixture. Backward arrow button sets missing temperature or heat capacity of one of the components. Enthalpy values show heat flow for each component.
Example of problems solved by application (screenshots):
Problem 1: Calculate the amount of energy required to change 100.0 g of ice at -15.0 °C to steam at 125.0 °C. Known values:
Heat of melting = 334.16 J g¯1
Heat of vaporization = 2259 J g¯1
specific heat capacity for solid water (ice) = 2.06 J g¯1 K¯1
specific heat capacity for liquid water = 4.184 J g¯1 K¯1
specific heat capacity for gaseous water (steam) = 2.02 J g¯1K¯1
Solution:
1) Heating of 100.0 g of ice from -15.0°C to 0.0°C:
(100.0 g) (15.0 K) (2.06 J g¯1 K¯1) = 3090 J
2) Melting of 100.0 g of ice:
(100.0 g) (334.16 J g¯1) = 33416 J
3) Heating of 100.0 g of liquid water from zero to 100.0 Celsius:
(100.0 g) (100.0 K) (4.184 J g¯1 K¯1) = 41840 J
4) Evaporations of 100.0 g of liquid:
(100.0 g) (2259 J g¯1) = 225900 J
5) Heating of 100.0 g of steam from 100.0 to 125.0 Celsius:
(100.0 g) (25.0 K) (2.02 J g¯1 K¯1) = 5050 J
6) Summation of the results:
3090 + 33416 + 41840 + 225900 + 5050 = 309.3 kJ
Problem 2: Determine the heat capacity of a coffee-cup calorimeter. During calibration 100.0 g of water at 58.5 °C has been added to 100.0 g of water, already in the calorimeter, at 22.8 °C. Calculate the heat capacity of the calorimeter in J/°C, if final temperature of the water is 39.7 °C. (Specific heat of water is 4.184 J/g °C.)
Solution:
1) Heat given up by warm water:
q = (100.0 g) (18.8 °C) (4.184 J/g °C) = 7865.92 J
2) Heat absorbed by water in the calorimeter:
q = (100.0 g) (16.9 °C) (4.184 J/g °C) = 7070.96 J
3) The difference was absorbed by the calorimeter:
7865.92 - 7070.96 = 794.96 J
4) Calorimeter constant:
794.96 J / 1