Focus Lt hyperfocal DOF
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 106 keywords for Focus Lt hyperfocal DOF in Apple App Store
Focus Lt hyperfocal DOF tracks 106 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 105 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.5, difficulty 38.9, best rank 186.
Tracked keywords
106
1 ranked • 105 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 186 • Latest leader 186
Avg opportunity
70.5
Top keyword: depth
Avg difficulty
38.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.9
depth
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Rank 186
Competitors: 113
- 64.7
simulation
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 86
- 68.5
suggestions
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 77
- 66.6
objects
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 116
- 63.8
object
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 71
Unranked opportunities
simulation
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Competitors: 86
suggestions
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 77
objects
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 116
object
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Competitors: 71
idea
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.3 • Competitors: 33
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 184,304 • Major competitors: 2,118
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.4
find
Total apps: 138,178 • Major competitors: 1,543
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.2
best
Total apps: 116,596 • Major competitors: 1,425
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4
view
Total apps: 96,658 • Major competitors: 691
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.5
different
Total apps: 94,817 • Major competitors: 854
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| depth | 73 | 100 | 41 | 68 11,391 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.3 | 186 | 186 | 113 major competitor apps |
| best | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 116,596 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,425 major competitor apps |
| new | 65 | 100 | 53 | 88 184,304 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,118 major competitor apps |
| simulation | 73 | 100 | 39 | 65 7,310 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 86 major competitor apps |
| focus | 70 | 100 | 45 | 75 30,568 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 197 major competitor apps |
| mode | 70 | 100 | 46 | 76 34,599 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 354 major competitor apps |
| try | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 40,795 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 514 major competitor apps |
| sensor | 72 | 100 | 35 | 58 3,050 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 11 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 50,918 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 251 major competitor apps |
| find | 66 | 100 | 52 | 86 138,178 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,543 major competitor apps |
| write | 72 | 100 | 42 | 70 15,451 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 102 major competitor apps |
| perfect | 67 | 100 | 50 | 83 86,571 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 872 major competitor apps |
| including | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 68,714 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 786 major competitor apps |
| function | 72 | 100 | 42 | 69 13,843 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 59 major competitor apps |
| small | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 23,205 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 164 major competitor apps |
| smart | 69 | 100 | 47 | 78 48,219 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 412 major competitor apps |
| view | 67 | 100 | 50 | 83 96,658 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 691 major competitor apps |
| suggestions | 73 | 100 | 41 | 68 12,282 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 77 major competitor apps |
| current | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 68,043 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 765 major competitor apps |
| closest | 72 | 100 | 36 | 59 3,164 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 44 major competitor apps |
| want | 67 | 100 | 50 | 82 84,290 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 754 major competitor apps |
| always | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 53,223 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 574 major competitor apps |
| achieve | 71 | 100 | 43 | 71 18,576 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 129 major competitor apps |
| work | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 55,590 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 456 major competitor apps |
| much | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 54,285 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 516 major competitor apps |
App Description
Use this depth of field and circle of confusion calculator to simulate the out of focus blur, depth of field and hyperfocal distance for different camera configurations, including the diffraction effect for small apertures. The blur values are measured in the pixels of the camera sensor. The blur simulation shows how much the infinity and the object will be blurred as seen on a 25 cm or 10 inch printout or screen.
You can tap on the magnifying glass to switch between full frame view, to asses the size of objects, and 1/10 of the frame view, where you can evaluate the blur.
The parameters are: *Distance* - distance to the object, *Lens type* - focal length, *F-number* - aperture setting, *Focus distance* - distance the lens is focused at, *Sensor* - the megapixel count of the matrix and the camera sensor size.
You can use the *HYPERFOCAL* mode to set the focus value to the hyperfocal distance for the current F value.
If you want to have both the object and the infinity in focus, use *AUTO HYPERFOCAL* mode, it will find the minimal F and the corresponding focus value. *AUTO HYPERFOCAL* will try to achieve the best possible result, but due to the diffraction effect of small apertures it's not always possible to get a sharp image, the simulation will reflect this.
The last smart function is *MAX BLUR FOCUS* - given an object distance and F-value it will suggest the closest focus value which will keep the object still in focus, while achieving maximum blur for the background. The idea is somewhat opposite of the hyperfocal shooting - here your focus point lies between the camera and the object with the depth of field ending on the object plane, ensuring the maximum possible blur for the background at your given F value. This works well if you are forced to use a relatively high F number, but there are no other objects in the view which are closer than the target.
The standard *circle of confusion* used for DoF, smart focus and max blur calculations is the sensor diagonal divided by *1730*, which is the so called Zeiss formula.
If you have any questions, suggestions or spotted an error, please don't hesitate to write to us: support@strelka.hk