ManageAnticoag
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 62 keywords for ManageAnticoag in Apple App Store
ManageAnticoag tracks 62 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 62 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 45.1, difficulty 38.0.
Tracked keywords
62
0 ranked • 62 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
45.1
Top keyword: best
Avg difficulty
38.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 85.9
best
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,398
- 85.7
access
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,388
- 79.1
whether
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 59.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 715
- 77.7
support
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 515
- 77.6
information
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 56.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 572
Unranked opportunities
best
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Competitors: 1,398
access
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.2 • Competitors: 1,388
whether
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 59.3 • Competitors: 715
support
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.8 • Competitors: 515
information
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 56.9 • Competitors: 572
High competition keywords
best
Total apps: 6,283 • Major competitors: 1,398
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.6
access
Total apps: 6,181 • Major competitors: 1,388
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.2
including
Total apps: 3,880 • Major competitors: 926
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.0
whether
Total apps: 3,139 • Major competitors: 715
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.3
support
Total apps: 2,741 • Major competitors: 515
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| best | 59 | 100 | 60 | 86 6,283 competing apps Median installs: 272,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,398 major competitor apps |
| whether | 58 | 100 | 59 | 79 3,139 competing apps Median installs: 267,650 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 715 major competitor apps |
| support | 58 | 100 | 56 | 78 2,741 competing apps Median installs: 233,950 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 515 major competitor apps |
| section | 57 | 100 | 39 | 57 318 competing apps Median installs: 234,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 62 major competitor apps |
| information | 58 | 100 | 57 | 78 2,704 competing apps Median installs: 252,888 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 572 major competitor apps |
| management | 58 | 100 | 46 | 66 856 competing apps Median installs: 221,550 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 138 major competitor apps |
| control | 58 | 100 | 54 | 76 2,353 competing apps Median installs: 243,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 466 major competitor apps |
| including | 58 | 100 | 62 | 81 3,880 competing apps Median installs: 285,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 926 major competitor apps |
| access | 59 | 100 | 63 | 86 6,181 competing apps Median installs: 268,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,388 major competitor apps |
| healthcare | 57 | 100 | 39 | 52 203 competing apps Median installs: 233,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 36 major competitor apps |
| patients | 57 | 100 | 30 | 45 99 competing apps Median installs: 221,425 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 21 major competitor apps |
| navigate | 58 | 100 | 47 | 65 750 competing apps Median installs: 248,912 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 162 major competitor apps |
| tools | 58 | 100 | 53 | 74 1,836 competing apps Median installs: 246,312 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 366 major competitor apps |
| patient | 57 | 100 | 30 | 45 94 competing apps Median installs: 207,600 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 14 major competitor apps |
| provider | 57 | 100 | 50 | 56 313 competing apps Median installs: 231,175 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 60 major competitor apps |
| tool | 58 | 100 | 47 | 69 1,134 competing apps Median installs: 210,275 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 170 major competitor apps |
| following | 58 | 100 | 47 | 70 1,211 competing apps Median installs: 266,925 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 263 major competitor apps |
| quick | 58 | 100 | 55 | 75 2,043 competing apps Median installs: 261,450 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 459 major competitor apps |
| decision | 57 | 100 | 33 | 49 152 competing apps Median installs: 197,275 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 30 major competitor apps |
| expert | 58 | 100 | 49 | 64 662 competing apps Median installs: 275,100 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 159 major competitor apps |
| summary | 57 | 100 | 44 | 49 148 competing apps Median installs: 285,338 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 34 major competitor apps |
| details | 58 | 100 | 56 | 68 1,045 competing apps Median installs: 248,175 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 246 major competitor apps |
| supporting | 57 | 100 | 33 | 50 159 competing apps Median installs: 185,350 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 16 major competitor apps |
| clinicians | 20 | 96 | 20 | 26 13 competing apps Median installs: 331,900 Avg rating: 4.8 | — | — | 4 major competitor apps |
| planning | 58 | 100 | 44 | 60 434 competing apps Median installs: 272,012 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 98 major competitor apps |
App Description
• Assessing whether and how to interrupt and bridge anticoagulation
• Managing acute bleeds, including the suggested use of reversal agents
• Determining whether and how anticoagulation should be restarted
A clinician can use the app by:
• Selecting which tool best applies to the patient scenario and following these steps:
o Enter patient details regarding bleed and stroke risk factors as prompted in the selected tool
o View individualized guidance on the advice screen
o Email a summary of the advice
• Use the Quick Reference section to access supporting information and details such as "Guidance for Administering Reversal Agents” and “Components of the Clinician-Patient Discussion."
Information in the app is derived from ACC’s Expert Consensus Decision Pathways on Periprocedural Management and Bleed Management in patients with AFib. The information and recommendations in this clinical decision support tool are meant to support clinical decision making. The app is not meant to and should not replace clinical judgement. The healthcare provider is in control of all diagnoses and other clinical decisions.