ManageAnticoag

Developer: American College of

Category: Medical

Add App to Comparison

~400 - 800

8.00 ratings

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 62 keywords for ManageAnticoag in Apple App Store

Developer: American College of Cardiology Category: medical Rating: 4.87

ManageAnticoag tracks 62 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 62 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.1, difficulty 37.2.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 62 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.1

Top keyword: healthcare

Avg difficulty

37.2

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

healthcare

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 38
66.2
patient

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 13
64.0
provider

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 56
65.0
supporting

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 16
63.9
regarding

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 48
63.4

Unranked opportunities

healthcare

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 38
patient

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Competitors: 13
provider

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Competitors: 56
supporting

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Competitors: 16
regarding

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.3 • Competitors: 48

High competition keywords

access

Total apps: 162,558 • Major competitors: 1,398

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.8
best

Total apps: 116,755 • Major competitors: 1,445

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4
information

Total apps: 111,770 • Major competitors: 564

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.0
whether

Total apps: 90,507 • Major competitors: 610

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.1
support

Total apps: 74,165 • Major competitors: 552

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.3

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
best	66	100	51	85 116,755 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,445 major competitor apps
whether	67	100	50	83 90,507 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	610 major competitor apps
support	67	100	49	82 74,165 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	552 major competitor apps
section	72	100	42	69 13,285 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	63 major competitor apps
information	66	100	51	85 111,770 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	564 major competitor apps
management	69	100	47	77 42,170 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	151 major competitor apps
control	68	100	49	81 65,098 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	495 major competitor apps
including	68	100	49	81 68,552 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	768 major competitor apps
access	65	100	53	87 162,558 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,398 major competitor apps
healthcare	73	100	40	66 8,991 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	38 major competitor apps
patients	72	100	38	63 5,427 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	18 major competitor apps
navigate	71	100	44	74 24,841 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	165 major competitor apps
tools	69	100	46	76 37,017 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	322 major competitor apps
patient	73	100	38	64 6,660 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	13 major competitor apps
provider	73	100	40	65 7,628 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	56 major competitor apps
tool	69	100	47	78 48,277 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	180 major competitor apps
following	70	100	45	75 28,765 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	258 major competitor apps
quick	68	100	49	80 62,033 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	483 major competitor apps
decision	72	100	38	62 5,407 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	37 major competitor apps
expert	72	100	42	70 14,850 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	172 major competitor apps
summary	72	100	37	62 4,800 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	27 major competitor apps
details	70	100	45	75 30,421 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	212 major competitor apps
supporting	73	100	38	64 6,588 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	16 major competitor apps
clinicians	70	100	30	50 948 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	3 major competitor apps
planning	72	100	42	70 15,379 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	104 major competitor apps

App Description

This clinical decision support app helps clinicians navigate periprocedural planning and bleed management scenarios for patients on oral anticoagulants (OAC). The app is comprised of three tools to support the following clinical decisions:
• Assessing whether and how to interrupt and bridge anticoagulation
• Managing acute bleeds, including the suggested use of reversal agents
• Determining whether and how anticoagulation should be restarted
A clinician can use the app by:
• Selecting which tool best applies to the patient scenario and following these steps:
o Enter patient details regarding bleed and stroke risk factors as prompted in the selected tool
o View individualized guidance on the advice screen
o Email a summary of the advice
• Use the Quick Reference section to access supporting information and details such as "Guidance for Administering Reversal Agents” and “Components of the Clinician-Patient Discussion."
Information in the app is derived from ACC’s Expert Consensus Decision Pathways on Periprocedural Management and Bleed Management in patients with AFib. The information and recommendations in this clinical decision support tool are meant to support clinical decision making. The app is not meant to and should not replace clinical judgement. The healthcare provider is in control of all diagnoses and other clinical decisions.