Geeks Xamarin
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 128 keywords for Geeks Xamarin in Apple App Store
Geeks Xamarin tracks 128 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 128 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.9, difficulty 41.2.
Tracked keywords
128
0 ranked • 128 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.9
Top keyword: source
Avg difficulty
41.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.6
source
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 109
- 66.1
delivered
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 175
- 66.2
driven
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 82
- 65.9
integration
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 105
- 63.5
logic
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 169
Unranked opportunities
source
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 109
delivered
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.9 • Competitors: 175
driven
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Competitors: 82
integration
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 105
logic
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Competitors: 169
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 190,736 • Major competitors: 2,966
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
experience
Total apps: 122,490 • Major competitors: 2,155
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.1
mobile
Total apps: 120,211 • Major competitors: 1,593
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.3
using
Total apps: 115,141 • Major competitors: 1,548
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
designed
Total apps: 114,471 • Major competitors: 1,080
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| top | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 46,867 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,075 major competitor apps |
| augmented reality | 72 | 100 | 38 | 62 4,788 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 43 major competitor apps |
| share | 66 | 100 | 55 | 85 113,889 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,783 major competitor apps |
| single | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 37,414 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 605 major competitor apps |
| source | 73 | 100 | 43 | 68 10,905 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 109 major competitor apps |
| source code | 69 | 100 | 28 | 45 485 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5 major competitor apps |
| internal | 72 | 100 | 38 | 62 5,106 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 39 major competitor apps |
| device | 69 | 100 | 50 | 79 50,271 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 843 major competitor apps |
| whether | 67 | 100 | 52 | 83 89,814 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,087 major competitor apps |
| experience | 66 | 100 | 54 | 85 122,490 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,155 major competitor apps |
| flexibility | 72 | 100 | 39 | 63 5,590 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 83 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 114,471 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,080 major competitor apps |
| enhance | 70 | 100 | 47 | 76 33,889 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 437 major competitor apps |
| save | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 85,036 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,597 major competitor apps |
| limited | 72 | 100 | 48 | 70 14,848 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 335 major competitor apps |
| created | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 26,406 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 302 major competitor apps |
| avoid | 72 | 100 | 45 | 71 17,372 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 331 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 115,141 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,548 major competitor apps |
| built | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 27,167 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 256 major competitor apps |
| delivered | 73 | 100 | 46 | 66 8,863 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 175 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 55 | 88 190,736 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,966 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 120,211 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,593 major competitor apps |
| basic | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 17,639 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 192 major competitor apps |
| write | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 15,562 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 210 major competitor apps |
| various | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 48,881 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 723 major competitor apps |
App Description
Xamarin Forms is one technology that's intended to fulfill that dream. It allows you to write your app using .NET, and run it natively on all mobile operating systems. However, as it's based on the lowest common denominator between different platforms, it's quite limited in many aspects and is only recommended for prototype apps, and basic data-driven apps (for internal use) that don't need a custom design. Also, it's a bit slow to run.
Contrary to Forms, the Xamarin Standard products are superb for creating professional and consumer-facing apps that are fast, custom-designed and totally flexible. They allow you to share the business logic code across different platforms. But when it comes to the UI code, you still have to write it separately for each platform, which is a pain. That duplication of effort obviously makes it time-consuming and costly to build, test, debug and maintain your app over time.
Geeks Esperanto is a game-changing framework built on top of Xamarin Standard. With Esperanto, an advanced and fully custom app can be developed only once (using C#) and then deployed to all platforms and devices natively, with full flexibility and top performance.
Esperanto will save your time, cut your costs and give your app a global audience instantly. It makes it painless to maintain, enhance and evolve your app over time with no duplication of effort.
This might sound too good to be true. Or you might suspect whether performance might be compromised. To address that concern and give you a first-hand experience of Geeks Esperanto for Xamarin, we have created this showcase app which shows an example of each native device feature, plus various visual components, from simple controls to augmented reality - all delivered with a single source code based on Esperanto.
This enables you to evidently assess and observe this technology's performance, power and flexibility to consider it for your own app development project.
Your app idea might need integration with the camera, GPS, map, fingerprint authentication, or any other native device feature. Also, it will certainly have visual elements and a UX design. By seeing examples of each of those in this showcase app you can achieve a first-hand experience of the qualit