UC Davis BRD

Developer: University of California,

Category: Education

Add App to Comparison

~150 - 300

3.00 ratings

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 104 keywords for UC Davis BRD in Apple App Store

Developer: University of California, Davis Category: education Rating: 5

UC Davis BRD tracks 104 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 104 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.5, difficulty 37.0.

Tracked keywords

104

0 ranked • 104 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.5

Top keyword: university

Avg difficulty

37.0

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

university

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 11
64.0
patient

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 14
64.0
upon

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 86
67.7
random

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 124
67.4
confidence

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 66
67.5

Unranked opportunities

university

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Competitors: 11
patient

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Competitors: 14
upon

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 86
random

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 124
confidence

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Competitors: 66

High competition keywords

mobile

Total apps: 117,282 • Major competitors: 771

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3
using

Total apps: 116,658 • Major competitors: 765

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3
best

Total apps: 115,306 • Major competitors: 1,376

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3
data

Total apps: 83,822 • Major competitors: 464

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.8
based

Total apps: 81,069 • Major competitors: 582

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.7

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
best	66	100	51	85 115,306 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,376 major competitor apps
health	69	100	46	77 38,128 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	293 major competitor apps
email	70	100	46	76 35,455 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	270 major competitor apps
version	70	100	45	75 29,193 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	180 major competitor apps
device	69	100	48	79 49,033 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	422 major competitor apps
users	68	100	48	80 61,678 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	361 major competitor apps
language	70	100	45	74 26,159 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	109 major competitor apps
used	68	100	48	79 51,134 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	235 major competitor apps
control	68	100	49	81 63,804 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	464 major competitor apps
using	66	100	51	85 116,658 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	765 major competitor apps
option	72	100	43	71 17,824 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	150 major competitor apps
mobile	66	100	51	85 117,282 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	771 major competitor apps
score	71	100	44	73 21,548 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	257 major competitor apps
university	73	100	39	64 6,584 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	11 major competitor apps
patient	73	100	38	64 6,564 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	14 major competitor apps
researchers	70	100	30	51 1,050 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	5 major competitor apps
upon	73	100	41	68 10,929 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	86 major competitor apps
culture	72	100	38	62 5,321 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	31 major competitor apps
aid	72	100	37	61 4,520 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	20 major competitor apps
producer	69	100	27	46 518 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	0 major competitor apps
love	68	100	48	79 53,152 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	782 major competitor apps
following	70	100	45	75 28,528 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	250 major competitor apps
school	71	100	44	73 23,874 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	122 major competitor apps
required	71	100	43	72 19,100 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	122 major competitor apps
statistical	70	100	31	52 1,194 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1 major competitor apps

App Description

The California (CA) BRD scoring system was developed by researchers at the University of California (UC) Davis’s School of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Animal Science and UC Agriculture and Natural Resources. This calf-side system relies on the binary classification of significant predictors of BRD in preweaned dairy calves based on a statistical model of over 2000 preweaned dairy calves. The system was also validated using data from over 500 preweaned dairy calves in California.

The app can be used as an aid to the herd veterinarian and producer in the prevention and control of pneumonia in pre-weaned dairy calves under the Veterinary Client Patient Relationship. Calves can be scored to determine their CA BRD score status and results stored in a searchable database on the user’s mobile device.
Users can also estimate the prevalence of BRD in a herd of calves by scoring a random sample of calves that the app identifies upon providing the herd size and the required inputs for a sample size formula or accepting the defaults for a best guess prevalence estimate (25%) and how tight of a 95% confidence interval is desired (10% bound).
Similarly, the Spanish version is accessible once the device language is switched.
Under settings, users can switch between Celsius and Fahrenheit temperature input and elect to email questions and results to the Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, UC Davis if that option is selected.

The CA BRD scoring system for preweaned dairy calves is based on the following research and referenced methods:

1 – Agreement between bovine respiratory disease scoring systems for pre-weaned dairy calves. Aly SS, Love WJ, Williams DR, Lehenbauer TW, Van Eenennaam A, Drake C, Kass PH, Farver TB. Anim Health Res Rev. 2014; 15:148-50.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25424381

2 – Development of a novel clinical scoring system for on-farm diagnosis of bovine respiratory disease in pre-weaned dairy calves. Love WJ, Lehenbauer TW, Kass PH, Van Eenennaam AL, Aly SS. PeerJ. 2014; 2;2:e238.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24482759

3– Sensitivity and specificity of on-farm scoring systems and nasal culture to detect bovine respiratory disease complex in preweaned dairy calves. Love WJ, Lehenbauer TW, Van Eenennaam AL, Drake CM, Kass PH, Farver TB, Aly SS. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2016; 28:119-28.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.