UC Davis BRD

Developer: University of California,

Category: Education

Add App to Comparison

150 installs

3.00 ratings

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 104 keywords for UC Davis BRD in Apple App Store

Developer: University of California, Davis Category: education Rating: 5

UC Davis BRD tracks 104 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 104 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.5, difficulty 37.6.

Tracked keywords

104

0 ranked • 104 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.5

Top keyword: university

Avg difficulty

37.6

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

university

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 19
64.0
patient

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 31
64.0
upon

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 144
67.5
random

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 188
67.5
confidence

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 130
67.8

Unranked opportunities

university

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Competitors: 19
patient

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Competitors: 31
upon

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 144
random

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Competitors: 188
confidence

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 130

High competition keywords

mobile

Total apps: 120,208 • Major competitors: 1,383

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
best

Total apps: 117,443 • Major competitors: 2,314

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.7
using

Total apps: 115,200 • Major competitors: 1,312

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
data

Total apps: 86,742 • Major competitors: 836

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.7
based

Total apps: 79,716 • Major competitors: 941

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.3

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
best	66	100	53	85 117,443 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	2,314 major competitor apps
health	69	100	48	77 39,249 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	477 major competitor apps
email	70	100	47	76 35,948 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	494 major competitor apps
version	70	100	46	75 29,569 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	304 major competitor apps
device	69	100	49	79 50,267 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	724 major competitor apps
users	68	100	49	80 60,763 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	568 major competitor apps
language	70	100	46	74 26,857 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	188 major competitor apps
used	69	100	48	79 50,699 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	423 major competitor apps
control	68	100	50	81 65,563 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	800 major competitor apps
using	66	100	52	85 115,200 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,312 major competitor apps
option	72	100	44	71 18,004 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	273 major competitor apps
mobile	66	100	52	85 120,208 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,383 major competitor apps
score	71	100	45	73 22,050 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	391 major competitor apps
university	73	100	39	64 6,679 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	19 major competitor apps
patient	73	100	39	64 6,705 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	31 major competitor apps
researchers	70	100	30	50 1,035 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	8 major competitor apps
upon	73	100	41	67 10,796 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	144 major competitor apps
culture	72	100	38	63 5,479 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	44 major competitor apps
aid	72	100	37	61 4,582 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	39 major competitor apps
producer	69	100	27	45 522 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	2 major competitor apps
love	68	100	51	79 54,606 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	1,273 major competitor apps
following	70	100	46	75 28,825 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	412 major competitor apps
school	71	100	45	73 24,316 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	224 major competitor apps
required	71	100	44	72 18,801 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	204 major competitor apps
statistical	70	100	31	52 1,222 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	5 major competitor apps

App Description

The California (CA) BRD scoring system was developed by researchers at the University of California (UC) Davis’s School of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Animal Science and UC Agriculture and Natural Resources. This calf-side system relies on the binary classification of significant predictors of BRD in preweaned dairy calves based on a statistical model of over 2000 preweaned dairy calves. The system was also validated using data from over 500 preweaned dairy calves in California.

The app can be used as an aid to the herd veterinarian and producer in the prevention and control of pneumonia in pre-weaned dairy calves under the Veterinary Client Patient Relationship. Calves can be scored to determine their CA BRD score status and results stored in a searchable database on the user’s mobile device.
Users can also estimate the prevalence of BRD in a herd of calves by scoring a random sample of calves that the app identifies upon providing the herd size and the required inputs for a sample size formula or accepting the defaults for a best guess prevalence estimate (25%) and how tight of a 95% confidence interval is desired (10% bound).
Similarly, the Spanish version is accessible once the device language is switched.
Under settings, users can switch between Celsius and Fahrenheit temperature input and elect to email questions and results to the Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, UC Davis if that option is selected.

The CA BRD scoring system for preweaned dairy calves is based on the following research and referenced methods:

1 – Agreement between bovine respiratory disease scoring systems for pre-weaned dairy calves. Aly SS, Love WJ, Williams DR, Lehenbauer TW, Van Eenennaam A, Drake C, Kass PH, Farver TB. Anim Health Res Rev. 2014; 15:148-50.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25424381

2 – Development of a novel clinical scoring system for on-farm diagnosis of bovine respiratory disease in pre-weaned dairy calves. Love WJ, Lehenbauer TW, Kass PH, Van Eenennaam AL, Aly SS. PeerJ. 2014; 2;2:e238.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24482759

3– Sensitivity and specificity of on-farm scoring systems and nasal culture to detect bovine respiratory disease complex in preweaned dairy calves. Love WJ, Lehenbauer TW, Van Eenennaam AL, Drake CM, Kass PH, Farver TB, Aly SS. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2016; 28:119-28.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.