UC Davis BRD

Developer: University of California,

Category: Education

~150 - 300

3 ratings

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 104 keywords for UC Davis BRD in Apple App Store

Developer: University of California, Davis Category: education Rating: 5

UC Davis BRD tracks 104 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 104 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 47.8, difficulty 36.2.

Tracked keywords

104

0 ranked • 104 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

47.8

Top keyword: best

Avg difficulty

36.2

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

best

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,398
85.9
health

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 307
70.9
email

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 303
71.2
version

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 182
67.9
device

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 425
74.6

Unranked opportunities

best

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Competitors: 1,398
health

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.3 • Competitors: 307
email

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.6 • Competitors: 303
version

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.6 • Competitors: 182
device

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.3 • Competitors: 425

High competition keywords

best

Total apps: 6,283 • Major competitors: 1,398

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.6
using

Total apps: 4,473 • Major competitors: 924

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.4
mobile

Total apps: 3,947 • Major competitors: 846

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.2
love

Total apps: 3,364 • Major competitors: 784

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.6
based

Total apps: 3,039 • Major competitors: 697

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
best	59	100	60	86 6,283 competing apps Median installs: 272,625 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	1,398 major competitor apps
health	58	100	51	71 1,361 competing apps Median installs: 248,675 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	307 major competitor apps
email	58	100	52	71 1,408 competing apps Median installs: 263,500 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	303 major competitor apps
version	58	100	46	68 1,006 competing apps Median installs: 238,775 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	182 major competitor apps
device	58	100	55	75 1,985 competing apps Median installs: 265,675 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	425 major competitor apps
users	58	100	52	75 1,979 competing apps Median installs: 259,400 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	430 major competitor apps
language	58	100	49	63 606 competing apps Median installs: 224,038 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	109 major competitor apps
used	58	100	53	72 1,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,800 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	279 major competitor apps
control	58	100	54	76 2,353 competing apps Median installs: 243,700 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	466 major competitor apps
using	58	100	61	83 4,473 competing apps Median installs: 247,200 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	924 major competitor apps
option	58	100	49	65 768 competing apps Median installs: 264,850 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	152 major competitor apps
mobile	58	100	60	81 3,947 competing apps Median installs: 251,675 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	846 major competitor apps
score	20	100	52	68 977 competing apps Median installs: 314,100 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	264 major competitor apps
university	57	100	31	41 67 competing apps Median installs: 211,800 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	11 major competitor apps
patient	57	100	30	45 94 competing apps Median installs: 207,600 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	14 major competitor apps
researchers	56	100	24	32 26 competing apps Median installs: 341,950 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	6 major competitor apps
upon	58	100	41	62 570 competing apps Median installs: 215,925 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	98 major competitor apps
culture	57	100	33	48 126 competing apps Median installs: 279,725 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	29 major competitor apps
aid	57	100	33	51 179 competing apps Median installs: 194,750 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	19 major competitor apps
producer	56	100	18	28 17 competing apps Median installs: 203,375 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	0 major competitor apps
love	58	100	59	80 3,364 competing apps Median installs: 278,288 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	784 major competitor apps
following	58	100	47	70 1,211 competing apps Median installs: 266,925 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	263 major competitor apps
school	58	100	46	63 636 competing apps Median installs: 268,812 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	129 major competitor apps
required	58	100	51	64 665 competing apps Median installs: 263,050 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	143 major competitor apps
statistical	56	100	19	30 21 competing apps Median installs: 154,050 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	1 major competitor apps

App Description

The California (CA) BRD scoring system was developed by researchers at the University of California (UC) Davis’s School of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Animal Science and UC Agriculture and Natural Resources. This calf-side system relies on the binary classification of significant predictors of BRD in preweaned dairy calves based on a statistical model of over 2000 preweaned dairy calves. The system was also validated using data from over 500 preweaned dairy calves in California.

The app can be used as an aid to the herd veterinarian and producer in the prevention and control of pneumonia in pre-weaned dairy calves under the Veterinary Client Patient Relationship. Calves can be scored to determine their CA BRD score status and results stored in a searchable database on the user’s mobile device.
Users can also estimate the prevalence of BRD in a herd of calves by scoring a random sample of calves that the app identifies upon providing the herd size and the required inputs for a sample size formula or accepting the defaults for a best guess prevalence estimate (25%) and how tight of a 95% confidence interval is desired (10% bound).
Similarly, the Spanish version is accessible once the device language is switched.
Under settings, users can switch between Celsius and Fahrenheit temperature input and elect to email questions and results to the Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, UC Davis if that option is selected.

The CA BRD scoring system for preweaned dairy calves is based on the following research and referenced methods:

1 – Agreement between bovine respiratory disease scoring systems for pre-weaned dairy calves. Aly SS, Love WJ, Williams DR, Lehenbauer TW, Van Eenennaam A, Drake C, Kass PH, Farver TB. Anim Health Res Rev. 2014; 15:148-50.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25424381

2 – Development of a novel clinical scoring system for on-farm diagnosis of bovine respiratory disease in pre-weaned dairy calves. Love WJ, Lehenbauer TW, Kass PH, Van Eenennaam AL, Aly SS. PeerJ. 2014; 2;2:e238.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24482759

3– Sensitivity and specificity of on-farm scoring systems and nasal culture to detect bovine respiratory disease complex in preweaned dairy calves. Love WJ, Lehenbauer TW, Van Eenennaam AL, Drake CM, Kass PH, Farver TB, Aly SS. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2016; 28:119-28.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.