DRU Classification

Category: Medical

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 44 keywords for DRU Classification in Apple App Store

Developer: Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong Category: medical

DRU Classification tracks 44 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 44 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 49.4, difficulty 33.7.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 44 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

49.4

Top keyword: features

Avg difficulty

33.7

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

features

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,060
83.9
users

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 430
74.6
image

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 142
65.6
management

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 138
66.3
accurate

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 140
65.6

Unranked opportunities

features

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.4 • Competitors: 1,060
users

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.5 • Competitors: 430
image

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Competitors: 142
management

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Competitors: 138
accurate

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.6 • Competitors: 140

High competition keywords

features

Total apps: 5,134 • Major competitors: 1,060

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.4
users

Total apps: 1,979 • Major competitors: 430

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.5
provides

Total apps: 1,846 • Major competitors: 308

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.1
good

Total apps: 1,413 • Major competitors: 294

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.9
tool

Total apps: 1,134 • Major competitors: 170

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 46.5

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
users	58	100	52	75 1,979 competing apps Median installs: 259,400 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	430 major competitor apps
image	58	100	46	66 796 competing apps Median installs: 225,225 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	142 major competitor apps
management	58	100	46	66 856 competing apps Median installs: 221,550 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	138 major competitor apps
function	57	100	38	58 375 competing apps Median installs: 210,150 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	52 major competitor apps
patients	57	100	30	45 99 competing apps Median installs: 221,425 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	21 major competitor apps
accurate	58	100	46	66 792 competing apps Median installs: 240,225 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	140 major competitor apps
provides	58	100	49	74 1,846 competing apps Median installs: 221,075 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	308 major competitor apps
tool	58	100	47	69 1,134 competing apps Median installs: 210,275 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	170 major competitor apps
good	58	100	52	71 1,413 competing apps Median installs: 276,475 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	294 major competitor apps
useful	58	100	41	61 522 competing apps Median installs: 207,200 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	90 major competitor apps
calculation	20	100	33	42 70 competing apps Median installs: 268,688 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	18 major competitor apps
features	59	100	60	84 5,134 competing apps Median installs: 252,300 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	1,060 major competitor apps
understand	58	100	44	65 776 competing apps Median installs: 244,462 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	142 major competitor apps
field	57	100	37	53 228 competing apps Median installs: 225,675 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	49 major competitor apps
final	57	100	38	55 274 competing apps Median installs: 241,688 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	50 major competitor apps
guiding	57	100	31	44 89 competing apps Median installs: 226,525 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	13 major competitor apps
automated	57	100	39	53 215 competing apps Median installs: 277,075 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	52 major competitor apps
height	57	100	27	40 59 competing apps Median installs: 227,450 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	12 major competitor apps
growth	57	100	36	54 251 competing apps Median installs: 213,975 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	52 major competitor apps
calculator	57	100	38	52 193 competing apps Median installs: 216,900 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	40 major competitor apps
body	58	100	44	64 677 competing apps Median installs: 242,600 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	118 major competitor apps
peak	57	100	29	43 77 competing apps Median installs: 309,600 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	10 major competitor apps
explanation	57	100	25	37 42 competing apps Median installs: 225,612 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	3 major competitor apps
prediction	57	100	32	38 46 competing apps Median installs: 344,938 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	10 major competitor apps
indicator	57	100	27	37 44 competing apps Median installs: 189,825 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	7 major competitor apps

App Description

The distal radius and ulna (DRU) classification is an accurate parameter of a child’s maturity status. It is useful for management of spine and limb deformities as it can predict the peak growth spurt and growth cessation with good sensitivity and specificity. It has also been shown to be an indicator of scoliosis curve progression and predict which curves will deteriorate. This app provides users with a tool to understand the DRU classification, how to use the classification for grading skeletal maturity, and also for guiding treatment. In addition, this app has a calculation function for final body height prediction for female patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

Current features:

1. Explanation of the DRU classification

2. Distal radius and ulna features on x-rays for grading

3. DRU grading quiz

4. Final height prediction calculator

5. Useful publications in this field of paediatric skeletal growth and scoliosis curve progression

Features to come:

1. Curve progression prediction

2. Image capture and automated grading and prediction