DRU Classification

Category: Medical

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 44 keywords for DRU Classification in Apple App Store

Developer: Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong Category: medical

DRU Classification tracks 44 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 43 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.4, difficulty 37.5, best rank 14.

Tracked keywords

1 ranked • 43 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank 14 • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.4

Top keyword: patients

Avg difficulty

37.5

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

patients

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 37.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 36
62.1
final

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 102
65.1
automated

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 86
63.2
growth

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 114
67.0
calculator

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 87
66.8

Unranked opportunities

patients

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 37.6 • Competitors: 36
final

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Competitors: 102
automated

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Competitors: 86
growth

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 114
calculator

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 87

High competition keywords

features

Total apps: 126,019 • Major competitors: 2,127

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
provides

Total apps: 72,538 • Major competitors: 568

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.2
users

Total apps: 60,535 • Major competitors: 676

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.5
tool

Total apps: 53,488 • Major competitors: 384

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.2
management

Total apps: 48,795 • Major competitors: 345

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 47.7

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
classification	70	100	31	51 1,118 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	14	14	6 major competitor apps
users	68	100	50	80 60,535 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	676 major competitor apps
image	70	100	46	74 27,952 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	304 major competitor apps
management	69	100	48	78 48,795 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	345 major competitor apps
function	72	100	42	69 14,731 competing apps Median installs: 351 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	159 major competitor apps
patients	73	100	38	62 5,409 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	36 major competitor apps
accurate	70	100	46	74 27,851 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	327 major competitor apps
provides	68	100	49	81 72,538 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	568 major competitor apps
tool	69	100	48	79 53,488 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	384 major competitor apps
good	70	100	48	75 33,794 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	586 major competitor apps
useful	71	100	44	72 20,153 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	198 major competitor apps
calculation	72	100	38	62 5,171 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	31 major competitor apps
features	66	100	54	85 126,019 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,127 major competitor apps
understand	71	100	45	73 26,240 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	240 major competitor apps
field	72	100	42	69 14,239 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	94 major competitor apps
final	73	100	40	65 8,271 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	102 major competitor apps
guiding	72	100	35	57 2,720 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.4	—	—	21 major competitor apps
automated	73	100	40	63 6,366 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	86 major competitor apps
height	71	100	34	55 2,104 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	22 major competitor apps
growth	73	100	41	67 10,741 competing apps Median installs: 369 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	114 major competitor apps
calculator	73	100	41	67 10,361 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	87 major competitor apps
body	71	100	44	71 19,944 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	242 major competitor apps
peak	72	100	35	57 2,790 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	35 major competitor apps
explanation	71	100	33	55 2,048 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	12 major competitor apps
prediction	71	100	35	54 1,693 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	26 major competitor apps

App Description

The distal radius and ulna (DRU) classification is an accurate parameter of a child’s maturity status. It is useful for management of spine and limb deformities as it can predict the peak growth spurt and growth cessation with good sensitivity and specificity. It has also been shown to be an indicator of scoliosis curve progression and predict which curves will deteriorate. This app provides users with a tool to understand the DRU classification, how to use the classification for grading skeletal maturity, and also for guiding treatment. In addition, this app has a calculation function for final body height prediction for female patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

Current features:

1. Explanation of the DRU classification

2. Distal radius and ulna features on x-rays for grading

3. DRU grading quiz

4. Final height prediction calculator

5. Useful publications in this field of paediatric skeletal growth and scoliosis curve progression

Features to come:

1. Curve progression prediction

2. Image capture and automated grading and prediction