Douay - Rhiems Catholic Bible
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 107 keywords for Douay - Rhiems Catholic Bible in Apple App Store
Douay - Rhiems Catholic Bible tracks 107 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 107 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 47.7, difficulty 33.9.
Tracked keywords
107
0 ranked • 107 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
47.7
Top keyword: new
Avg difficulty
33.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 91.1
new
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 2,341
- 67.3
word
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 48.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 205
- 65.6
words
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 48.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 147
- 71.8
used
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 279
- 65.2
modern
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 43.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 149
Unranked opportunities
new
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.9 • Competitors: 2,341
word
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 48.5 • Competitors: 205
words
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 48.4 • Competitors: 147
used
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.9 • Competitors: 279
modern
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 43.7 • Competitors: 149
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 10,701 • Major competitors: 2,341
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.9
many
Total apps: 3,804 • Major competitors: 758
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
full
Total apps: 3,264 • Major competitors: 629
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.0
become
Total apps: 3,091 • Major competitors: 678
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.3
first
Total apps: 2,569 • Major competitors: 528
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new | 59 | 100 | 64 | 91 10,701 competing apps Median installs: 270,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 2,341 major competitor apps |
| word | 58 | 100 | 49 | 67 941 competing apps Median installs: 260,450 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 205 major competitor apps |
| words | 58 | 100 | 48 | 66 797 competing apps Median installs: 227,050 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 147 major competitor apps |
| used | 58 | 100 | 53 | 72 1,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,800 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 279 major competitor apps |
| modern | 58 | 100 | 44 | 65 761 competing apps Median installs: 232,175 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 149 major competitor apps |
| speaking | 57 | 100 | 33 | 48 127 competing apps Median installs: 283,825 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 22 major competitor apps |
| de | 57 | 100 | 36 | 54 236 competing apps Median installs: 202,262 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 31 major competitor apps |
| founded | 57 | 100 | 31 | 42 70 competing apps Median installs: 155,600 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 14 major competitor apps |
| english | 58 | 100 | 43 | 60 443 competing apps Median installs: 230,525 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 68 major competitor apps |
| text | 58 | 100 | 53 | 72 1,581 competing apps Median installs: 243,000 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 315 major competitor apps |
| financial | 58 | 100 | 54 | 65 763 competing apps Median installs: 247,975 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 162 major competitor apps |
| many | 58 | 100 | 55 | 81 3,804 competing apps Median installs: 252,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 758 major competitor apps |
| books | 57 | 100 | 40 | 55 279 competing apps Median installs: 211,875 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 46 major competitor apps |
| work | 58 | 100 | 53 | 75 2,084 competing apps Median installs: 265,425 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 452 major competitor apps |
| become | 58 | 100 | 54 | 79 3,091 competing apps Median installs: 275,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 678 major competitor apps |
| members | 20 | 100 | 64 | 66 793 competing apps Median installs: 314,475 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 213 major competitor apps |
| became | 57 | 100 | 26 | 40 59 competing apps Median installs: 164,200 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 5 major competitor apps |
| publication | 56 | 100 | 24 | 35 35 competing apps Median installs: 211,950 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 5 major competitor apps |
| centuries | 56 | 100 | 18 | 27 15 competing apps Median installs: 178,050 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
| includes | 58 | 100 | 49 | 70 1,252 competing apps Median installs: 237,900 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 246 major competitor apps |
| full | 58 | 100 | 57 | 79 3,264 competing apps Median installs: 240,412 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 629 major competitor apps |
| accuracy | 57 | 100 | 36 | 52 200 competing apps Median installs: 229,738 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 42 major competitor apps |
| two | 58 | 100 | 49 | 70 1,253 competing apps Median installs: 238,750 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 249 major competitor apps |
| increasingly | 57 | 100 | 35 | 49 150 competing apps Median installs: 283,975 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 31 major competitor apps |
| seven | 57 | 100 | 36 | 49 149 competing apps Median installs: 239,325 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 27 major competitor apps |
App Description
In 1568, English exiles who were members of the college at Douai, in Flanders, founded by William (later Cardinal) Allen, began the work of preparing a Bible translation, which has become the foundation of nearly all English Catholic versions. In October, 1578, Gregory Martin began the work of preparing an English translation of the Bible for Catholic readers, the first such translation into Modern English. Assisting were William Allen, Richard Bristow, Thomas Worthington, and William Reynolds who revised, criticized, and corrected Dr. Martin's work. The college published the New Testament at (Reims/Rhemes) , in 1582 through John Fogny with a preface and explanatory notes.
Later, the Old Testament was published at in two parts (1609 and 1610) by Laurence Kellam through the efforts of Dr. Worthington, then superior of the seminary. The Douay-Rheims translation had been prepared before the appearance of the New Testament, but the publication was delayed due to financial difficulties. The religious and scholarly adherence to the Latin Vulgate text led to the less elegant and idiomatic words and phrases often found in the translation. In some instances where no English word conveyed the full meaning of the Latin, a Latin word was Anglicized and its meaning defined in a glossary. Although ridiculed by critics, many of these words later found common usage in the English language. Spellings of proper names and the numbering of the Psalms are adopted from the Latin Vulgate.
In 1749 Dr. Richard Challoner began a major revision of the Douay-Rheims Catholic Bible and texts, the spellings and phrasing of which had become increasingly archaic in the almost two centuries since the translations were first produced. He modernized the diction and introduced a more fluid style, while faithfully maintaining the accuracy of Dr. Martin's texts. This revision became the 'de facto' standard text for English speaking Catholics until the twentieth century. It is still highly regarded by many for its style, although it is now rarely used for liturgical purposes. The notes
AppGoblin