Douay - Rhiems Catholic Bible
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 107 keywords for Douay - Rhiems Catholic Bible in Apple App Store
Douay - Rhiems Catholic Bible tracks 107 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 107 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.4, difficulty 35.0.
Tracked keywords
107
0 ranked • 107 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.4
Top keyword: books
Avg difficulty
35.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.4
books
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 60
- 64.5
accuracy
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 52
- 66.0
often
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 65
- 65.1
due
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 61
- 66.1
usage
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 80
Unranked opportunities
books
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 60
accuracy
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 52
often
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Competitors: 65
due
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 61
usage
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Competitors: 80
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 183,899 • Major competitors: 2,437
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
many
Total apps: 77,402 • Major competitors: 813
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.4
full
Total apps: 69,590 • Major competitors: 648
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.1
first
Total apps: 56,605 • Major competitors: 556
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.1
work
Total apps: 55,760 • Major competitors: 535
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new | 65 | 100 | 53 | 88 183,899 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,437 major competitor apps |
| word | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 23,676 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 241 major competitor apps |
| words | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 23,007 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 157 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 50,849 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 307 major competitor apps |
| modern | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 22,181 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 192 major competitor apps |
| speaking | 72 | 100 | 37 | 62 5,191 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 34 major competitor apps |
| de | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 17,800 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 66 major competitor apps |
| founded | 71 | 100 | 35 | 58 2,816 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 13 major competitor apps |
| english | 71 | 100 | 43 | 72 20,205 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 89 major competitor apps |
| text | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 40,653 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 378 major competitor apps |
| financial | 71 | 100 | 44 | 71 18,366 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 197 major competitor apps |
| many | 67 | 100 | 49 | 82 77,402 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 813 major competitor apps |
| books | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 8,107 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 60 major competitor apps |
| work | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 55,760 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 535 major competitor apps |
| become | 69 | 100 | 47 | 78 44,721 competing apps Median installs: 175 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 733 major competitor apps |
| members | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 19,843 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 208 major competitor apps |
| became | 71 | 100 | 32 | 54 1,622 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3 major competitor apps |
| publication | 71 | 100 | 33 | 55 1,931 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 5 major competitor apps |
| centuries | 69 | 100 | 27 | 44 451 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
| includes | 70 | 100 | 46 | 76 33,927 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 256 major competitor apps |
| full | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 69,590 competing apps Median installs: 175 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 648 major competitor apps |
| accuracy | 73 | 100 | 39 | 65 7,170 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 52 major competitor apps |
| two | 70 | 100 | 45 | 75 31,624 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 259 major competitor apps |
| increasingly | 71 | 100 | 35 | 58 2,818 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 39 major competitor apps |
| seven | 72 | 100 | 38 | 63 5,577 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.5 | — | — | 26 major competitor apps |
App Description
In 1568, English exiles who were members of the college at Douai, in Flanders, founded by William (later Cardinal) Allen, began the work of preparing a Bible translation, which has become the foundation of nearly all English Catholic versions. In October, 1578, Gregory Martin began the work of preparing an English translation of the Bible for Catholic readers, the first such translation into Modern English. Assisting were William Allen, Richard Bristow, Thomas Worthington, and William Reynolds who revised, criticized, and corrected Dr. Martin's work. The college published the New Testament at (Reims/Rhemes) , in 1582 through John Fogny with a preface and explanatory notes.
Later, the Old Testament was published at in two parts (1609 and 1610) by Laurence Kellam through the efforts of Dr. Worthington, then superior of the seminary. The Douay-Rheims translation had been prepared before the appearance of the New Testament, but the publication was delayed due to financial difficulties. The religious and scholarly adherence to the Latin Vulgate text led to the less elegant and idiomatic words and phrases often found in the translation. In some instances where no English word conveyed the full meaning of the Latin, a Latin word was Anglicized and its meaning defined in a glossary. Although ridiculed by critics, many of these words later found common usage in the English language. Spellings of proper names and the numbering of the Psalms are adopted from the Latin Vulgate.
In 1749 Dr. Richard Challoner began a major revision of the Douay-Rheims Catholic Bible and texts, the spellings and phrasing of which had become increasingly archaic in the almost two centuries since the translations were first produced. He modernized the diction and introduced a more fluid style, while faithfully maintaining the accuracy of Dr. Martin's texts. This revision became the 'de facto' standard text for English speaking Catholics until the twentieth century. It is still highly regarded by many for its style, although it is now rarely used for liturgical purposes. The notes