MetaFarms Sow Mobile

Developer: MetaFarms, Inc.

Category: Productivity

Add App to Comparison

200 installs

4.00 ratings

15 monthly active users

Revenue not available

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 33 keywords for MetaFarms Sow Mobile in Apple App Store

Developer: MetaFarms, Inc. Category: productivity Rating: 5

MetaFarms Sow Mobile tracks 33 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 32 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 69.9, difficulty 40.9, best rank 54.

Tracked keywords

1 ranked • 32 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank 54 • Latest leader 54

Avg opportunity

69.9

Top keyword: far

Avg difficulty

40.9

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

far

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Rank 54

Competitors: 253
66.0
integration

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 156
66.4
specifically

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 144
68.2
site

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 126
66.9
bar

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 111
64.5

Unranked opportunities

integration

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Competitors: 156
specifically

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Competitors: 144
site

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 126
bar

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Competitors: 111
customized

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.2 • Competitors: 313

High competition keywords

experience

Total apps: 135,887 • Major competitors: 3,211

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.8
mobile

Total apps: 130,500 • Major competitors: 2,212

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.1
designed

Total apps: 113,335 • Major competitors: 1,608

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3
world

Total apps: 92,063 • Major competitors: 2,970

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.3
user

Total apps: 77,316 • Major competitors: 1,498

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.3

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
far	73	100	43	66 9,292 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2	54	54	253 major competitor apps
challenging	70	100	47	74 27,346 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	970 major competitor apps
environment	72	100	42	69 14,855 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	237 major competitor apps
users	68	100	49	79 60,249 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,007 major competitor apps
experience	66	100	54	85 135,887 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	3,211 major competitor apps
designed	66	100	51	84 113,335 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,608 major competitor apps
management	69	100	48	78 48,807 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	522 major competitor apps
mobile	66	100	53	85 130,500 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,212 major competitor apps
intuitive	68	100	49	79 58,955 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	937 major competitor apps
enterprise	72	100	36	59 3,742 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	23 major competitor apps
solve	72	100	44	70 17,181 competing apps Median installs: 950 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	622 major competitor apps
integration	73	100	41	66 9,798 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	156 major competitor apps
producer	69	100	28	46 553 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	8 major competitor apps
specifically	73	100	42	68 12,587 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	144 major competitor apps
user	67	100	50	81 77,316 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,498 major competitor apps
full	68	100	50	80 68,511 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,576 major competitor apps
world	67	100	52	83 92,063 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	2,970 major competitor apps
specifically designed	71	100	35	56 2,380 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	27 major competitor apps
size	72	100	44	69 14,923 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	382 major competitor apps
well	69	100	47	77 43,687 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	792 major competitor apps
technology	70	100	46	74 28,241 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	458 major competitor apps
site	73	100	41	67 10,637 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	126 major competitor apps
bar	73	100	40	64 7,565 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	111 major competitor apps
customized	73	100	43	68 12,299 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	313 major competitor apps
user experience	72	100	36	58 2,886 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	46 major competitor apps

App Description

The versatility and intuitive user experience of Sow Mobile was specifically designed for swine producers and the challenging environment in which they work. As opposed to other "one size fits all" solutions, MetaFarms' Sow Mobile can be customized for each producer and site as well as users themselves.

Combining the above and full integration with our Enterprise Livestock Management system, MetaFarms' Sow Mobile raises the bar by leveraging technology to solve real-world inefficiencies.