Horus Condition Report Pro
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 111 keywords for Horus Condition Report Pro in Apple App Store
Horus Condition Report Pro tracks 111 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 110 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 53.0, difficulty 40.9, best rank 38.
Tracked keywords
111
1 ranked • 110 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 38 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
53.0
Top keyword: take
Avg difficulty
40.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 83.4
take
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,068
- 84.7
create
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,155
- 86.9
every
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,637
- 83.4
even
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,114
- 63.6
conditions
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 54.2 • Rank 38
Competitors: 145
Unranked opportunities
take
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Competitors: 1,068
create
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.6 • Competitors: 1,155
every
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.5 • Competitors: 1,637
even
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.4 • Competitors: 1,114
art
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Competitors: 202
High competition keywords
every
Total apps: 6,989 • Major competitors: 1,637
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.5
create
Total apps: 5,537 • Major competitors: 1,155
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.6
take
Total apps: 4,876 • Major competitors: 1,068
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.6
even
Total apps: 4,869 • Major competitors: 1,114
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.4
start
Total apps: 4,261 • Major competitors: 950
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.2
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| conditions | 58 | 100 | 54 | 64 646 competing apps Median installs: 283,000 Avg rating: 4.6 | 38 | 38 | 145 major competitor apps |
| art | 58 | 100 | 47 | 69 1,082 competing apps Median installs: 239,212 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 202 major competitor apps |
| single | 58 | 100 | 50 | 72 1,511 competing apps Median installs: 234,575 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 294 major competitor apps |
| version | 58 | 100 | 46 | 68 1,006 competing apps Median installs: 238,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 182 major competitor apps |
| via | 58 | 100 | 55 | 75 2,102 competing apps Median installs: 260,250 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 427 major competitor apps |
| within | 58 | 100 | 56 | 81 3,722 competing apps Median installs: 259,688 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 740 major competitor apps |
| digital | 58 | 100 | 52 | 72 1,579 competing apps Median installs: 256,800 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 339 major competitor apps |
| collection | 58 | 100 | 48 | 70 1,259 competing apps Median installs: 268,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 276 major competitor apps |
| designed | 58 | 100 | 54 | 80 3,407 competing apps Median installs: 230,000 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 624 major competitor apps |
| management | 58 | 100 | 46 | 66 856 competing apps Median installs: 221,550 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 138 major competitor apps |
| treated | 56 | 100 | 21 | 30 21 competing apps Median installs: 275,875 Avg rating: 4.8 | — | — | 3 major competitor apps |
| list | 58 | 100 | 52 | 70 1,187 competing apps Median installs: 244,150 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 251 major competitor apps |
| connection | 58 | 100 | 49 | 68 990 competing apps Median installs: 280,788 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 223 major competitor apps |
| available | 58 | 100 | 64 | 82 4,074 competing apps Median installs: 282,412 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 979 major competitor apps |
| intuitive | 58 | 100 | 48 | 72 1,513 competing apps Median installs: 238,275 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 270 major competitor apps |
| write | 58 | 100 | 43 | 61 515 competing apps Median installs: 240,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 97 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 58 | 100 | 54 | 78 2,846 competing apps Median installs: 239,425 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 550 major competitor apps |
| update | 58 | 100 | 47 | 65 767 competing apps Median installs: 272,550 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 168 major competitor apps |
| directly | 58 | 100 | 58 | 74 1,959 competing apps Median installs: 280,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 424 major competitor apps |
| take | 59 | 100 | 60 | 83 4,876 competing apps Median installs: 260,038 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,068 major competitor apps |
| monitor | 58 | 100 | 49 | 66 847 competing apps Median installs: 244,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 175 major competitor apps |
| efficient | 57 | 100 | 41 | 57 326 competing apps Median installs: 207,525 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 44 major competitor apps |
| start | 58 | 100 | 59 | 82 4,261 competing apps Median installs: 258,025 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 950 major competitor apps |
| pro | 58 | 100 | 48 | 70 1,222 competing apps Median installs: 250,738 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 233 major competitor apps |
| text | 58 | 100 | 53 | 72 1,581 competing apps Median installs: 243,000 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 315 major competitor apps |
App Description
Our application is specifically developed for museums, art centers, restoration workshops, heritage services, and foundations. It is intended for professionals who conduct condition reports for loans, exhibition setups, inventories, or damage assessments.
With its intuitive interface, the application allows you to create detailed condition reports, including:
* Overview photographs,
* Alteration records annotated directly on photos,
* Localized detail images,
* Digital signatures,
* And, in the Pro version, treatment reports with text and photos.
A Complete and Flexible Solution
The application enables you to generate multiple condition reports for a single object within the same document, simplifying the management of condition assessments at the start and end of an exhibition. It also offers two layout options:
1. A standard version,
2. A version optimized for exhibition services.
Fully customizable, it allows you to configure fields, set up alteration lists, and optimize your workflow.
An Efficient Tool, Even Offline
The application operates 100% offline, with no internet connection required. Reports are stored locally and can be exported via email, Airdrop, cloud storage, a PDF reader (iBooks, GoodReader), or iTunes. They can be modified, duplicated, and exported in PDF, Horus (for further processing), and CSV (for an overview of treated artworks).
The optional Drive feature facilitates the management and sharing of condition reports within a team.
Features Designed for Professionals
* Precise annotations: Clearly locate alterations on images.
* Optimized artwork management: Every detail is documented and positioned on records.
* Specialized vocabulary: A predefined list of typical alterations for heritage materials, which can be customized as needed.
* All-in-one tool: Take photos, annotate, write reports, sign, and send files—all from one device, without needing a scanner or computer.
* Multilingual accessibility: Available in French, English, Italian, Spanish, German, Swedish, Dutch, Portuguese, and Arabic, with specialized vocabulary lists validated by conservators and restorers.
* Monitor the condition of artworks over time: Edit and update reports at a later date.
* Seamless data import: Upload CSV files from Excel, Numbers, or collection management software.
* Comprehensive intervent