IDentifyIt Species
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 87 keywords for IDentifyIt Species in Apple App Store
IDentifyIt Species tracks 87 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 86 need traction). Key metrics: 100% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.2, difficulty 39.3, best rank 8.
Tracked keywords
87
1 ranked • 86 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
100%
Best rank 8 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.2
Top keyword: collaboration
Avg difficulty
39.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.2
collaboration
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 60
- 68.5
series
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 257
- 67.2
strategic
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 287
- 66.6
assist
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 103
- 63.9
nature
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 84
Unranked opportunities
collaboration
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Competitors: 60
series
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Competitors: 257
strategic
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.2 • Competitors: 287
assist
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 103
nature
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 84
High competition keywords
free
Total apps: 176,038 • Major competitors: 3,927
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
mobile
Total apps: 130,038 • Major competitors: 1,614
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.2
information
Total apps: 121,651 • Major competitors: 1,140
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
using
Total apps: 114,568 • Major competitors: 1,550
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.1
designed
Total apps: 113,897 • Major competitors: 1,081
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| species | 72 | 100 | 36 | 58 3,146 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | 8 | 8 | 35 major competitor apps |
| free | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 176,038 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,927 major competitor apps |
| collaboration | 73 | 100 | 44 | 63 6,341 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 60 major competitor apps |
| better | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 41,425 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 708 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 121,651 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,140 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 51 | 84 113,897 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,081 major competitor apps |
| institute | 71 | 100 | 34 | 56 2,322 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5 major competitor apps |
| management | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 48,802 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 346 major competitor apps |
| created | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 26,277 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 298 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 114,568 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,550 major competitor apps |
| international | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 16,874 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 262 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 130,038 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,614 major competitor apps |
| added | 71 | 100 | 45 | 71 19,831 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 401 major competitor apps |
| including | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 67,563 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,390 major competitor apps |
| series | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 13,146 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 257 major competitor apps |
| tool | 69 | 100 | 48 | 79 53,498 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 383 major competitor apps |
| easily | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 85,281 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,267 major competitor apps |
| strategic | 73 | 100 | 43 | 67 11,069 competing apps Median installs: 800 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 287 major competitor apps |
| see | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 92,622 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,751 major competitor apps |
| next | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 46,939 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 888 major competitor apps |
| location | 69 | 100 | 48 | 76 39,863 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 498 major competitor apps |
| guide | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 33,716 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 328 major competitor apps |
| quick | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 70,843 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 925 major competitor apps |
| assist | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,081 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 103 major competitor apps |
| nature | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 6,925 competing apps Median installs: 576 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 84 major competitor apps |
App Description
This free mobile app is designed to lead you through a series of interactive steps, using photographs and easily observable features, to assist you with quick identification. The tool also includes fact sheets containing important information such as conservation status, identifying features, geographic location as well as similar-looking species.
The IDentifyIt Species Tool currently consists of 140 CITES-listed South African plant and animal species, their look-alike species as well as traded parts and derivatives. The next phase of this project will see another 300 + species, including amphibians, birds, fish, invertebrates, mammals and reptiles, added to the Species ID Tool.
The IDentifyIt Species Tool project has also developed the IDentifyIt Cycads Tool which has been designed to assist with the identification of South African Encephalartos Species.
The project is a collaboration between the South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) and TRAFFIC, the Wildlife Trade Monitoring Network, a strategic alliance of WWF-World Wide Fund for Nature and IUCN-The World Conservation Union. The project was sponsored by NORAD, SANBI and the Mazda Wildlife Fund.