Paediatric Intensive Care

Developer: The Royal Children's

Category: Medical

Add App to Comparison

400 installs

8.00 ratings

35 monthly active users

Revenue not available

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 41 keywords for Paediatric Intensive Care in Apple App Store

Developer: The Royal Children's Hospital Category: medical Rating: 4.5

Paediatric Intensive Care tracks 41 keywords (3 keywords rank; 38 need traction). Key metrics: 33% top-10 coverage, opportunity 69.8, difficulty 34.0, best rank 3.

Tracked keywords

3 ranked • 38 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

33%

Best rank 3 • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.8

Top keyword: material

Avg difficulty

34.0

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

material

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 43
63.5
head

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 225
65.2
written

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 64
64.8
parts

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 115
64.7
intensity

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 38.1 • Rank 52

Competitors: 62
59.1

Unranked opportunities

material

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.8 • Competitors: 43
head

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 225
written

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 64
parts

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Competitors: 115
section

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 120

High competition keywords

stay

Total apps: 103,051 • Major competitors: 1,354

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.3
many

Total apps: 76,904 • Major competitors: 1,359

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.3
including

Total apps: 67,637 • Major competitors: 1,399

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.9
first

Total apps: 56,085 • Major competitors: 908

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.2
medical

Total apps: 21,734 • Major competitors: 143

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 43.8

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
intensive	70	100	29	48 721 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	3	3	6 major competitor apps
intensity	72	100	38	59 3,598 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1	52	52	62 major competitor apps
intense	72	100	40	62 5,290 competing apps Median installs: 1,050 Avg rating: 4.1	78	74	149 major competitor apps
section	72	100	42	69 14,183 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	120 major competitor apps
medical	71	100	44	72 21,734 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	143 major competitor apps
including	68	100	52	80 67,637 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,399 major competitor apps
stay	67	100	53	83 103,051 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,354 major competitor apps
many	68	100	50	81 76,904 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,359 major competitor apps
developed	71	100	44	72 21,270 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	138 major competitor apps
staff	72	100	42	70 16,153 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	76 major competitor apps
first	68	100	49	79 56,085 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	908 major competitor apps
material	73	100	39	64 6,606 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	43 major competitor apps
royal	71	100	38	57 2,540 competing apps Median installs: 775 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	56 major competitor apps
butt	68	100	25	41 293 competing apps Median installs: 1,300 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	6 major competitor apps
chief	69	100	28	47 626 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	8 major competitor apps
head	73	100	42	65 8,396 competing apps Median installs: 800 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	225 major competitor apps
mike	69	100	28	45 507 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	9 major competitor apps
general	72	100	42	69 14,213 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	101 major competitor apps
chris	69	100	27	44 433 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	4 major competitor apps
ben	69	100	29	47 626 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	10 major competitor apps
adapted	71	100	34	54 1,680 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	32 major competitor apps
edition	72	100	38	61 4,792 competing apps Median installs: 950 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	66 major competitor apps
operative	69	100	26	43 386 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	5 major competitor apps
michael	70	100	30	47 696 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	12 major competitor apps
written	73	100	39	65 7,873 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	64 major competitor apps

App Description

The first edition of the booklet was written by Frank Shann, Rob Henning and Lara Shekerdemian with contributions from other medical staff at the RCH PICU, including Warwick Butt (ECMO, Filtration), James Tibballs (Envenomation), and Mike South. Many parts of this booklet were developed in collaboration with other departments at the Royal Children’s Hospital, or adapted from material produced by other departments.

This edition was substantially revised by the senior medical staff at RCH in 2016-17. Trevor Duke (general section and chief editor); Johnny Millar (cardiac section editor); Roberto Chiletti (ECMO and haemofiltration); Michael Clifford (Analgesia, Sedation, Anaesthesia); Ben Gelbart (Organ donation, MET); Chris James (Nutrition, PETS); Bennett Sheridan (Cardiomyopathy and VAD sections); Thomas Rozen (Head injury, Trauma), Siva Namachivayam (Long-stay PICU patients); Tali Gladish (Orthopaedic post-operative care, Sepsis); and Warwick Butt (PICU admin).