Strat Mobile
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 88 keywords for Strat Mobile in Apple App Store
Strat Mobile tracks 88 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 88 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 51.7, difficulty 41.5.
Tracked keywords
88
0 ranked • 88 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
51.7
Top keyword: thickness
Avg difficulty
41.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 24.4
thickness
Opportunity: 61.0 • Difficulty: 15.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 1
- 88.7
time
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,805
- 83.3
see
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 64.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,122
- 86.9
every
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,637
- 80.9
right
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 62.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 912
Unranked opportunities
thickness
Opportunity: 61.0 • Difficulty: 15.9 • Competitors: 1
time
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Competitors: 1,805
see
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 64.7 • Competitors: 1,122
every
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.5 • Competitors: 1,637
right
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 62.5 • Competitors: 912
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 8,391 • Major competitors: 1,805
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.9
every
Total apps: 6,989 • Major competitors: 1,637
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.5
see
Total apps: 4,836 • Major competitors: 1,122
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.7
using
Total apps: 4,473 • Major competitors: 924
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.4
start
Total apps: 4,261 • Major competitors: 950
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.2
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| right | 58 | 100 | 63 | 81 3,793 competing apps Median installs: 282,075 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 912 major competitor apps |
| device | 58 | 100 | 55 | 75 1,985 competing apps Median installs: 265,675 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 425 major competitor apps |
| section | 57 | 100 | 39 | 57 318 competing apps Median installs: 234,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 62 major competitor apps |
| date | 58 | 100 | 55 | 70 1,250 competing apps Median installs: 269,412 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 274 major competitor apps |
| collection | 58 | 100 | 48 | 70 1,259 competing apps Median installs: 268,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 276 major competitor apps |
| used | 58 | 100 | 53 | 72 1,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,800 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 279 major competitor apps |
| image | 58 | 100 | 46 | 66 796 competing apps Median installs: 225,225 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 142 major competitor apps |
| connection | 58 | 100 | 49 | 68 990 competing apps Median installs: 280,788 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 223 major competitor apps |
| using | 58 | 100 | 61 | 83 4,473 competing apps Median installs: 247,200 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 924 major competitor apps |
| time | 59 | 100 | 63 | 89 8,391 competing apps Median installs: 259,600 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,805 major competitor apps |
| traditional | 58 | 100 | 43 | 61 495 competing apps Median installs: 285,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 111 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 58 | 100 | 60 | 81 3,947 competing apps Median installs: 251,675 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 846 major competitor apps |
| provide | 58 | 100 | 49 | 73 1,667 competing apps Median installs: 243,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 293 major competitor apps |
| program | 58 | 100 | 51 | 62 534 competing apps Median installs: 269,325 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 126 major competitor apps |
| basic | 58 | 100 | 42 | 62 541 competing apps Median installs: 219,850 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 84 major competitor apps |
| including | 58 | 100 | 62 | 81 3,880 competing apps Median installs: 285,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 926 major competitor apps |
| directly | 58 | 100 | 58 | 74 1,959 competing apps Median installs: 280,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 424 major competitor apps |
| start | 58 | 100 | 59 | 82 4,261 competing apps Median installs: 258,025 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 950 major competitor apps |
| ios | 58 | 100 | 50 | 69 1,128 competing apps Median installs: 238,712 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 226 major competitor apps |
| real | 58 | 100 | 59 | 81 3,692 competing apps Median installs: 264,862 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 828 major competitor apps |
| see | 59 | 100 | 65 | 83 4,836 competing apps Median installs: 287,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,122 major competitor apps |
| work | 58 | 100 | 53 | 75 2,084 competing apps Median installs: 265,425 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 452 major competitor apps |
| know | 58 | 100 | 60 | 78 2,679 competing apps Median installs: 276,750 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 627 major competitor apps |
| devices | 58 | 100 | 56 | 69 1,158 competing apps Median installs: 268,300 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 267 major competitor apps |
| output | 57 | 100 | 31 | 43 80 competing apps Median installs: 224,850 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 7 major competitor apps |
App Description
• Real time plotting of the stratigraphic section as it is being measured.
• Measure sections using your know eye height as the “Jacob Staff” by sighting down dip through the device camera. The thickness of the measured interval, of course, depends directly on the dip (as well as your eye height).
• Measure sections using a traditional Jacob Staff. The device can determine the strike and dip of the bedding for you with the tap of a button
• Measure sections using a tape measure. You enter the tape azimuth, slope, start and end point, as well as the strike and dip of bedding, and the device will calculate the correct thickness automatically.
• Automatically record, latitude, longitude, time and date for every interval measured
• You can define an unlimited number of lithology types (with corresponding colors and widths) to draw your section and tag your observations
• Provide basic statistics on the section measured, including the thicknesses and percentages of each lithology
• See the locations of entire sections, measured intervals, and samples on a satellite image or road map.
• Provide basic input and output of data using standard iOS conventions
Will work on iPhones or iPads. The program will work on iPads lacking a cellular data connection but those devices have fewer sensors and thus cannot be used in automatic data collection mode.