Strat Mobile
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 88 keywords for Strat Mobile in Apple App Store
Strat Mobile tracks 88 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 88 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.0, difficulty 39.8.
Tracked keywords
88
0 ranked • 88 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.0
Top keyword: calculate
Avg difficulty
39.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.7
calculate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 44
- 68.1
perform
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 58
- 65.4
measure
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 46
- 67.1
draw
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 146
- 67.4
eye
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 111
Unranked opportunities
calculate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 44
perform
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 58
measure
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 46
draw
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Competitors: 146
eye
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 111
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 192,042 • Major competitors: 1,611
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.4
every
Total apps: 121,665 • Major competitors: 1,430
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.6
mobile
Total apps: 119,489 • Major competitors: 861
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4
using
Total apps: 115,865 • Major competitors: 808
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.2
see
Total apps: 93,951 • Major competitors: 988
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| right | 67 | 100 | 50 | 82 82,732 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 941 major competitor apps |
| device | 69 | 100 | 48 | 79 49,894 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 445 major competitor apps |
| section | 72 | 100 | 42 | 69 13,275 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 62 major competitor apps |
| date | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 40,153 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 265 major competitor apps |
| collection | 70 | 100 | 45 | 75 30,057 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 282 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 50,872 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 250 major competitor apps |
| image | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 25,717 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 150 major competitor apps |
| connection | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 25,946 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 222 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 115,865 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 808 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 53 | 88 192,042 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,611 major competitor apps |
| traditional | 72 | 100 | 42 | 70 15,712 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 122 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 119,489 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 861 major competitor apps |
| provide | 68 | 100 | 48 | 80 56,245 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 270 major competitor apps |
| program | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 17,236 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 126 major competitor apps |
| basic | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 17,516 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 88 major competitor apps |
| including | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 68,614 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 786 major competitor apps |
| directly | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 52,598 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 368 major competitor apps |
| start | 67 | 100 | 50 | 83 92,779 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,003 major competitor apps |
| ios | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 32,205 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 225 major competitor apps |
| real | 67 | 100 | 50 | 82 84,726 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 962 major competitor apps |
| see | 67 | 100 | 51 | 83 93,951 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 988 major competitor apps |
| work | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 55,622 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 457 major competitor apps |
| know | 68 | 100 | 49 | 80 60,011 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 646 major competitor apps |
| devices | 71 | 100 | 45 | 74 24,669 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 240 major competitor apps |
| output | 72 | 100 | 36 | 60 3,766 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 7 major competitor apps |
App Description
• Real time plotting of the stratigraphic section as it is being measured.
• Measure sections using your know eye height as the “Jacob Staff” by sighting down dip through the device camera. The thickness of the measured interval, of course, depends directly on the dip (as well as your eye height).
• Measure sections using a traditional Jacob Staff. The device can determine the strike and dip of the bedding for you with the tap of a button
• Measure sections using a tape measure. You enter the tape azimuth, slope, start and end point, as well as the strike and dip of bedding, and the device will calculate the correct thickness automatically.
• Automatically record, latitude, longitude, time and date for every interval measured
• You can define an unlimited number of lithology types (with corresponding colors and widths) to draw your section and tag your observations
• Provide basic statistics on the section measured, including the thicknesses and percentages of each lithology
• See the locations of entire sections, measured intervals, and samples on a satellite image or road map.
• Provide basic input and output of data using standard iOS conventions
Will work on iPhones or iPads. The program will work on iPads lacking a cellular data connection but those devices have fewer sensors and thus cannot be used in automatic data collection mode.