-look-
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 84 keywords for -look- in Apple App Store
-look- tracks 84 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 84 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 51.3, difficulty 42.5.
Tracked keywords
84
0 ranked • 84 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
51.3
Top keyword: best
Avg difficulty
42.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 85.9
best
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,398
- 88.4
make
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,773
- 83.9
experience
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,134
- 86.3
find
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,481
- 88.7
time
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,805
Unranked opportunities
best
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Competitors: 1,398
make
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.7 • Competitors: 1,773
experience
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.1 • Competitors: 1,134
find
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.8 • Competitors: 1,481
time
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Competitors: 1,805
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 8,391 • Major competitors: 1,805
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.9
make
Total apps: 8,094 • Major competitors: 1,773
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.7
like
Total apps: 7,508 • Major competitors: 1,767
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.2
find
Total apps: 6,521 • Major competitors: 1,481
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.8
best
Total apps: 6,283 • Major competitors: 1,398
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| best | 59 | 100 | 60 | 86 6,283 competing apps Median installs: 272,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,398 major competitor apps |
| top | 58 | 100 | 59 | 78 2,843 competing apps Median installs: 305,500 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 706 major competitor apps |
| puzzle | 58 | 100 | 50 | 75 2,006 competing apps Median installs: 275,850 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 447 major competitor apps |
| level | 58 | 100 | 54 | 78 2,734 competing apps Median installs: 274,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 638 major competitor apps |
| change | 58 | 100 | 54 | 74 1,855 competing apps Median installs: 267,450 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 400 major competitor apps |
| make | 59 | 100 | 63 | 88 8,094 competing apps Median installs: 266,850 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,773 major competitor apps |
| images | 58 | 100 | 51 | 69 1,097 competing apps Median installs: 227,650 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 197 major competitor apps |
| experience | 59 | 100 | 59 | 84 5,154 competing apps Median installs: 261,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,134 major competitor apps |
| design | 58 | 100 | 50 | 73 1,669 competing apps Median installs: 243,225 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 335 major competitor apps |
| using | 58 | 100 | 61 | 83 4,473 competing apps Median installs: 247,200 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 924 major competitor apps |
| find | 59 | 100 | 64 | 86 6,521 competing apps Median installs: 264,850 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,481 major competitor apps |
| time | 59 | 100 | 63 | 89 8,391 competing apps Median installs: 259,600 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,805 major competitor apps |
| international | 58 | 100 | 53 | 62 549 competing apps Median installs: 271,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 113 major competitor apps |
| process | 58 | 100 | 45 | 63 624 competing apps Median installs: 224,238 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 122 major competitor apps |
| including | 58 | 100 | 62 | 81 3,880 competing apps Median installs: 285,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 926 major competitor apps |
| virtual | 58 | 100 | 53 | 69 1,101 competing apps Median installs: 270,025 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 274 major competitor apps |
| move | 58 | 100 | 51 | 71 1,366 competing apps Median installs: 278,150 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 311 major competitor apps |
| success | 58 | 100 | 39 | 59 424 competing apps Median installs: 233,662 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 75 major competitor apps |
| others | 58 | 100 | 47 | 64 698 competing apps Median installs: 281,575 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 158 major competitor apps |
| skills | 58 | 100 | 52 | 77 2,546 competing apps Median installs: 275,562 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 580 major competitor apps |
| achievement | 57 | 100 | 30 | 41 64 competing apps Median installs: 260,788 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 12 major competitor apps |
| view | 58 | 100 | 60 | 79 3,121 competing apps Median installs: 254,100 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 667 major competitor apps |
| many | 58 | 100 | 55 | 81 3,804 competing apps Median installs: 252,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 758 major competitor apps |
| improve | 58 | 100 | 50 | 74 1,897 competing apps Median installs: 240,375 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 379 major competitor apps |
| performance | 58 | 100 | 43 | 63 623 competing apps Median installs: 242,325 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 113 major competitor apps |
App Description
look is waiting for you to train your brain! Ready?
Features:
◈ 120 mind-blowing levels
◈ Improves spatial ability
◈ Enhances 3D thinking
◈ Sharpens the mind
◈ Relaxing music
◈ Mental workout
WHAT IS SPATIAL ABILITY?
Spatial ability is "the aptitude needed to mentally process three-dimensional images of objects." (Fleisig et al. 2004).
WHY IS SPATIAL ABILITY IMPORTANT?
"There is evidence which indicates that strong spatial skills are required for achievement in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) careers. Many people, including science and engineering professors, view such skills as important for success in fields like engineering." (Gutierrez, Dominguez, & Gonzalez, 2015)
CAN SPATIAL ABILITY BE FURTHER DEVELOPED?
"The level of spatial performance someone is capable of may change over time. You are likely to gain in performance through practice, training, and learning, but you may also lose in standing relative to others if they acquire more experience that supports their performance or make more progress in their intellectual development." (Johns Hopkins University, 2018)
If you wish to improve or retain the level of your spatial ability, -look- will be one of the best options.
Fleisig, R. V., A. Robertson, et al. (2004). Improving the Spatial Visualization Skills of First Year Engineering Students. Inaugural CDEN Design Conference, Montreal, Quebec.
Johns Hopkins University. (2018, August 28). Spatial Ability. Retrieved from http://www.jhu.edu: http://web.jhu.edu/cty/STBguide.pdf
Martin Gutierrez, J., Garcia Dominguez, M., & Roca Gonzalez, C. (2015). Using 3D virtual technologies to train spatial skills in engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31(1), 323-334.