Freadom - Read.Play.Go
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 56 keywords for Freadom - Read.Play.Go in Apple App Store
Freadom - Read.Play.Go tracks 56 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 55 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.2, difficulty 41.3, best rank 159.
Tracked keywords
56
1 ranked • 55 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 159 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.2
Top keyword: curated
Avg difficulty
41.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.6
curated
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 207
- 66.4
positive
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 116
- 67.8
carefully
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 187
- 66.8
early
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 216
- 65.3
desired
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 77
Unranked opportunities
curated
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Competitors: 207
positive
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Competitors: 116
carefully
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 187
early
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.1 • Competitors: 216
desired
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 77
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 190,736 • Major competitors: 2,966
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
designed
Total apps: 114,471 • Major competitors: 1,080
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.8
way
Total apps: 107,117 • Major competitors: 1,932
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
play
Total apps: 92,195 • Major competitors: 2,447
Latest rank: 159 • Difficulty: 52.7
daily
Total apps: 75,222 • Major competitors: 1,463
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| play | 67 | 100 | 53 | 83 92,195 competing apps Median installs: 800 Avg rating: 4.1 | 159 | 159 | 2,447 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 52,042 competing apps Median installs: 583 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,181 major competitor apps |
| users | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 60,732 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 667 major competitor apps |
| curated | 73 | 100 | 44 | 69 12,542 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.4 | — | — | 207 major competitor apps |
| language | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 26,856 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 234 major competitor apps |
| learn | 67 | 100 | 52 | 81 73,360 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,078 major competitor apps |
| collection | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 30,231 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 518 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 114,471 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,080 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 107,117 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,932 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 55 | 88 190,736 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,966 major competitor apps |
| reading | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 20,065 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 226 major competitor apps |
| effective | 72 | 100 | 43 | 70 16,268 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 142 major competitor apps |
| english | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 20,299 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 171 major competitor apps |
| lifelong | 71 | 100 | 34 | 54 1,699 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.4 | — | — | 21 major competitor apps |
| news | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 28,801 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 431 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 49 | 81 72,728 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 564 major competitor apps |
| together | 71 | 100 | 47 | 72 20,934 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 396 major competitor apps |
| nurturing | 70 | 100 | 31 | 50 919 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 7 major competitor apps |
| positive | 73 | 100 | 41 | 66 9,332 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 116 major competitor apps |
| monthly | 70 | 100 | 49 | 74 26,180 competing apps Median installs: 950 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 734 major competitor apps |
| daily | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 75,222 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 1,463 major competitor apps |
| developed | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 21,327 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 138 major competitor apps |
| aged | 71 | 100 | 36 | 57 2,531 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 51 major competitor apps |
| parents | 72 | 100 | 43 | 69 14,053 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 160 major competitor apps |
| children | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 20,258 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 206 major competitor apps |
App Description
Built on 7.5 years of primary and secondary research, it first locates the users reading level and then navigates them to the desired level, basis a proprietary reading scale developed by Stones2Milestones. The aim is to encourage family bonding over time spent reading together from an early age, which studies have found to be the most effective way of nurturing a lifelong reading habit.
Check out our terms of use here: https://getfreadom.com/terms-policy