Fecaloscope - Stool Horoscope
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 47 keywords for Fecaloscope - Stool Horoscope in Apple App Store
Fecaloscope - Stool Horoscope tracks 47 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 47 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 50.2, difficulty 40.0.
Tracked keywords
47
0 ranked • 47 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
50.2
Top keyword: best
Avg difficulty
40.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 85.9
best
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,398
- 88.4
make
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,773
- 83.4
take
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,068
- 68.6
art
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 202
- 67.9
version
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 182
Unranked opportunities
best
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Competitors: 1,398
make
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.7 • Competitors: 1,773
take
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Competitors: 1,068
art
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Competitors: 202
version
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.6 • Competitors: 182
High competition keywords
make
Total apps: 8,094 • Major competitors: 1,773
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.7
best
Total apps: 6,283 • Major competitors: 1,398
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.6
take
Total apps: 4,876 • Major competitors: 1,068
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.6
using
Total apps: 4,473 • Major competitors: 924
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.4
many
Total apps: 3,804 • Major competitors: 758
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| best | 59 | 100 | 60 | 86 6,283 competing apps Median installs: 272,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,398 major competitor apps |
| art | 58 | 100 | 47 | 69 1,082 competing apps Median installs: 239,212 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 202 major competitor apps |
| version | 58 | 100 | 46 | 68 1,006 competing apps Median installs: 238,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 182 major competitor apps |
| make | 59 | 100 | 63 | 88 8,094 competing apps Median installs: 266,850 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,773 major competitor apps |
| designed | 58 | 100 | 54 | 80 3,407 competing apps Median installs: 230,000 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 624 major competitor apps |
| using | 58 | 100 | 61 | 83 4,473 competing apps Median installs: 247,200 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 924 major competitor apps |
| process | 58 | 100 | 45 | 63 624 competing apps Median installs: 224,238 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 122 major competitor apps |
| picture | 58 | 100 | 49 | 66 847 competing apps Median installs: 250,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 178 major competitor apps |
| take | 59 | 100 | 60 | 83 4,876 competing apps Median installs: 260,038 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,068 major competitor apps |
| ios | 58 | 100 | 50 | 69 1,128 competing apps Median installs: 238,712 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 226 major competitor apps |
| many | 58 | 100 | 55 | 81 3,804 competing apps Median installs: 252,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 758 major competitor apps |
| quality | 58 | 100 | 53 | 74 1,906 competing apps Median installs: 248,725 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 383 major competitor apps |
| powered | 58 | 100 | 51 | 67 897 competing apps Median installs: 294,275 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 216 major competitor apps |
| good | 58 | 100 | 52 | 71 1,413 competing apps Median installs: 276,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 294 major competitor apps |
| decade | 20 | 100 | 31 | 35 35 competing apps Median installs: 265,250 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 10 major competitor apps |
| advanced | 58 | 100 | 52 | 74 1,839 competing apps Median installs: 239,250 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 345 major competitor apps |
| hosted | 20 | 100 | 31 | 38 46 competing apps Median installs: 342,012 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 15 major competitor apps |
| achieve | 58 | 100 | 44 | 64 697 competing apps Median installs: 225,025 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 133 major competitor apps |
| ever | 58 | 100 | 51 | 72 1,471 competing apps Median installs: 273,350 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 326 major competitor apps |
| network | 58 | 100 | 54 | 67 914 competing apps Median installs: 273,675 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 211 major competitor apps |
| give | 58 | 100 | 52 | 74 1,932 competing apps Median installs: 252,888 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 401 major competitor apps |
| present | 57 | 100 | 41 | 53 226 competing apps Median installs: 208,862 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 49 major competitor apps |
| wondered | 57 | 100 | 28 | 43 76 competing apps Median installs: 190,138 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 14 major competitor apps |
| best results | 56 | 100 | 20 | 29 18 competing apps Median installs: 267,250 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 4 major competitor apps |
| research | 57 | 100 | 41 | 56 285 competing apps Median installs: 233,400 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 48 major competitor apps |
App Description
No more!
Introducing Fecaloscope, designed after a decade of research by the MIT of Moldavia, powered by an advanced neural network hosted on the Blockchain and Myers-Briggs deep analysis, our system achieve state of the art results, up to 92,7% accuracy[1], to give you an horoscope that is really useful.
How does it work? It's simple, just take a picture of your stool and let the app compute all the data, and present you your horoscope of the day. Because the process can be very compute intensive, we recommend using a recent version of iOS to make the process faster.
[1](in laboratory conditions, for best results we recommend you use good quality pictures with warm lighting).