Fecaloscope - Stool Horoscope
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 47 keywords for Fecaloscope - Stool Horoscope in Apple App Store
Fecaloscope - Stool Horoscope tracks 47 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 47 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.8, difficulty 40.6.
Tracked keywords
47
0 ranked • 47 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.8
Top keyword: present
Avg difficulty
40.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.9
present
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 95
- 66.9
research
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 110
- 68.6
recent
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 169
- 70.5
pictures
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 230
- 62.8
recommend
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 90
Unranked opportunities
present
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 95
research
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 110
recent
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.8 • Competitors: 169
pictures
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.3 • Competitors: 230
recommend
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Competitors: 90
High competition keywords
make
Total apps: 159,506 • Major competitors: 2,928
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
best
Total apps: 117,438 • Major competitors: 2,620
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.0
using
Total apps: 115,141 • Major competitors: 1,548
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
designed
Total apps: 114,471 • Major competitors: 1,080
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.8
take
Total apps: 95,526 • Major competitors: 1,742
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| best | 66 | 100 | 54 | 85 117,438 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,620 major competitor apps |
| art | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 23,923 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 412 major competitor apps |
| version | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 29,567 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 378 major competitor apps |
| make | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 159,506 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,928 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 114,471 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,080 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 115,141 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,548 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 25,749 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 226 major competitor apps |
| picture | 71 | 100 | 46 | 72 19,636 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 312 major competitor apps |
| take | 67 | 100 | 53 | 83 95,526 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,742 major competitor apps |
| ios | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 32,381 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 427 major competitor apps |
| many | 67 | 100 | 51 | 82 77,117 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,352 major competitor apps |
| quality | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 53,208 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 771 major competitor apps |
| powered | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 23,814 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 311 major competitor apps |
| good | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 32,154 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 580 major competitor apps |
| decade | 69 | 100 | 31 | 46 575 competing apps Median installs: 625 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 15 major competitor apps |
| advanced | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 48,179 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 745 major competitor apps |
| hosted | 71 | 100 | 34 | 55 1,922 competing apps Median installs: 346 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 19 major competitor apps |
| achieve | 71 | 100 | 44 | 71 18,428 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 242 major competitor apps |
| ever | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 23,165 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 529 major competitor apps |
| network | 71 | 100 | 47 | 74 24,688 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 418 major competitor apps |
| give | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 41,852 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 697 major competitor apps |
| present | 73 | 100 | 41 | 66 8,709 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 95 major competitor apps |
| wondered | 71 | 100 | 33 | 53 1,563 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 22 major competitor apps |
| best results | 69 | 100 | 27 | 44 436 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 3.8 | — | — | 7 major competitor apps |
| research | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 10,014 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 110 major competitor apps |
App Description
No more!
Introducing Fecaloscope, designed after a decade of research by the MIT of Moldavia, powered by an advanced neural network hosted on the Blockchain and Myers-Briggs deep analysis, our system achieve state of the art results, up to 92,7% accuracy[1], to give you an horoscope that is really useful.
How does it work? It's simple, just take a picture of your stool and let the app compute all the data, and present you your horoscope of the day. Because the process can be very compute intensive, we recommend using a recent version of iOS to make the process faster.
[1](in laboratory conditions, for best results we recommend you use good quality pictures with warm lighting).