-unfold-
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 85 keywords for -unfold- in Apple App Store
-unfold- tracks 85 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 85 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.1, difficulty 39.5.
Tracked keywords
85
0 ranked • 85 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.1
Top keyword: success
Avg difficulty
39.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.4
success
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 90
- 67.2
needed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 69
- 67.3
someone
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 98
- 64.6
successful
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 47
- 68.7
relaxing
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 316
Unranked opportunities
success
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Competitors: 90
needed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 69
someone
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 98
successful
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 47
relaxing
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Competitors: 316
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 191,460 • Major competitors: 1,852
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
make
Total apps: 160,093 • Major competitors: 1,860
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.8
like
Total apps: 142,680 • Major competitors: 2,089
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.5
experience
Total apps: 121,884 • Major competitors: 1,381
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.6
best
Total apps: 116,953 • Major competitors: 1,658
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| best | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 116,953 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,658 major competitor apps |
| puzzle | 70 | 100 | 45 | 75 29,343 competing apps Median installs: 175 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 552 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 51,644 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 763 major competitor apps |
| music | 70 | 100 | 46 | 76 32,639 competing apps Median installs: 175 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 365 major competitor apps |
| change | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 38,506 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 487 major competitor apps |
| make | 65 | 100 | 53 | 87 160,093 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,860 major competitor apps |
| images | 70 | 100 | 45 | 75 28,485 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 196 major competitor apps |
| exclusive | 70 | 100 | 47 | 76 35,166 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 789 major competitor apps |
| experience | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 121,884 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,381 major competitor apps |
| design | 69 | 100 | 46 | 76 36,412 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 421 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 115,531 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 949 major competitor apps |
| option | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 17,975 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 191 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 53 | 88 191,460 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,852 major competitor apps |
| international | 72 | 100 | 43 | 70 15,178 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 141 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 44 | 74 25,686 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 139 major competitor apps |
| including | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 68,338 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 903 major competitor apps |
| virtual | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 22,721 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 322 major competitor apps |
| move | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 26,889 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 326 major competitor apps |
| success | 73 | 100 | 40 | 66 9,236 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 90 major competitor apps |
| others | 72 | 100 | 43 | 70 16,049 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 157 major competitor apps |
| skills | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 41,911 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 618 major competitor apps |
| achievement | 71 | 100 | 34 | 56 2,315 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 16 major competitor apps |
| view | 67 | 100 | 51 | 83 97,057 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 782 major competitor apps |
| many | 67 | 100 | 49 | 82 77,302 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 804 major competitor apps |
| improve | 69 | 100 | 47 | 78 45,400 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 399 major competitor apps |
App Description
-unfold- is waiting for you to train your spatial ability. Ready?
Features:
◈ Minimalistic design
◈ 50 mind-blowing levels
◈ Relaxing music & sounds
◈ Enhances 3D thinking
◈ Sharpens the mind
◈ Exclusive for iOS
WHAT IS SPATIAL ABILITY?
Spatial ability is "the aptitude needed to mentally process three-dimensional images of objects." (Fleisig et al. 2004).
WHY IS SPATIAL ABILITY IMPORTANT?
"There is evidence which indicates that strong spatial skills are required for achievement in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) careers. Many people, including science and engineering professors, view such skills as important for success in fields like engineering." (Gutierrez, Dominguez, & Gonzalez, 2015)
CAN SPATIAL ABILITY BE FURTHER DEVELOPED?
"The level of spatial performance someone is capable of may change over time. You are likely to gain in performance through practice, training, and learning, but you may also lose in standing relative to others if they acquire more experience that supports their performance or make more progress in their intellectual development." (Johns Hopkins University, 2018)
If you wish to improve or retain the level of your spatial ability, -unfold- will be the best option for you.
Fleisig, R. V., A. Robertson, et al. (2004). Improving the Spatial Visualization Skills of First Year Engineering Students. Inaugural CDEN Design Conference, Montreal, Quebec.
Johns Hopkins University. (2018, August 28). Spatial Ability. Retrieved from http://www.jhu.edu: http://web.jhu.edu/cty/STBguide.pdf
Martin Gutierrez, J., Garcia Dominguez, M., & Roca Gonzalez, C. (2015). Using 3D virtual technologies to train spatial skills in engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31(1), 323-334.