SilageSnap
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 75 keywords for SilageSnap in Apple App Store
SilageSnap tracks 75 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 75 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.4, difficulty 39.2.
Tracked keywords
75
0 ranked • 75 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.4
Top keyword: storage
Avg difficulty
39.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.0
storage
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 137
- 64.1
university
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 28
- 63.7
checking
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 136
- 63.7
idea
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 71
- 64.9
method
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 80
Unranked opportunities
storage
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.1 • Competitors: 137
university
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Competitors: 28
checking
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 136
idea
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Competitors: 71
method
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Competitors: 80
High competition keywords
mobile
Total apps: 130,065 • Major competitors: 1,614
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.2
allows
Total apps: 80,112 • Major competitors: 657
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.6
based
Total apps: 79,271 • Major competitors: 1,048
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.8
multiple
Total apps: 76,392 • Major competitors: 1,127
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.5
check
Total apps: 71,584 • Major competitors: 1,279
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| better | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 41,420 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 707 major competitor apps |
| particle | 69 | 100 | 28 | 46 582 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 4 major competitor apps |
| image | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 27,959 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 305 major competitor apps |
| storage | 73 | 100 | 44 | 67 10,714 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 137 major competitor apps |
| file | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 15,827 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 205 major competitor apps |
| working | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 21,964 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 253 major competitor apps |
| traditional | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 17,514 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 225 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 130,065 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,614 major competitor apps |
| provide | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 55,802 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 558 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 76,392 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,127 major competitor apps |
| score | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 23,640 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 439 major competitor apps |
| special | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 48,126 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,058 major competitor apps |
| store | 69 | 100 | 51 | 77 44,800 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 910 major competitor apps |
| university | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 7,173 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 28 major competitor apps |
| collected | 72 | 100 | 39 | 61 4,407 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 36 major competitor apps |
| coin | 72 | 100 | 38 | 59 3,424 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 86 major competitor apps |
| visit | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 31,636 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 694 major competitor apps |
| surface | 72 | 100 | 38 | 58 2,957 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 47 major competitor apps |
| text | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 44,032 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 620 major competitor apps |
| always | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 52,475 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,016 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 50 | 82 80,112 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 657 major competitor apps |
| ever | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 23,064 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 531 major competitor apps |
| check | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 71,584 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,279 major competitor apps |
| please | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 56,135 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 975 major competitor apps |
| checking | 73 | 100 | 43 | 64 6,776 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 136 major competitor apps |
App Description
1. The SilageSnap app installed on your mobile device.
2. A U.S. coin or 1 Euro or ½ Euro coin.
3. A bucket for hydrodynamic (water) separation of the kernels from the plant material.
4. A dark/matte surface for the background of the image.
Once the image is collected and processed, SilageSnap will provide a result of “Good” or “Bad” based on traditional KPS metrics. Multiple assessments of samples always provide a better average. The app will also store your results in a text file along with the image collected that you can send to your computer for storage and further analysis. Please visit http://wimachineryextension.bse.wisc.edu/precision-agriculture/silagesnap for details on checking calibration and proper use of the SilageSnap app. SilageSnap is the result of a collaborative effort between the University of Wisconsin-Madison, UW Extension, and the Midwest Forage Association. Special thanks to the Baldwin Wisconsin Idea Endowment.