CSiRebar
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 43 keywords for CSiRebar in Apple App Store
CSiRebar tracks 43 keywords (3 keywords rank; 40 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.9, difficulty 40.3, best rank 68.
Tracked keywords
43
3 ranked • 40 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 68 • Latest leader 103
Avg opportunity
70.9
Top keyword: structured
Avg difficulty
40.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.0
structured
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank 103
Competitors: 51
- 64.9
conveniently
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 109
- 65.3
combination
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 147
- 68.6
several
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 163
- 64.5
bar
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 76
Unranked opportunities
conveniently
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Competitors: 109
combination
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 147
several
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 163
bar
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 76
convert
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Competitors: 145
High competition keywords
using
Total apps: 114,552 • Major competitors: 1,550
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.1
view
Total apps: 108,095 • Major competitors: 1,319
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.3
many
Total apps: 76,838 • Major competitors: 1,349
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.3
provide
Total apps: 55,802 • Major competitors: 558
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.4
select
Total apps: 52,057 • Major competitors: 802
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| reinforce | 71 | 100 | 36 | 57 2,621 competing apps Median installs: 436 Avg rating: 4.3 | 68 | 68 | 17 major competitor apps |
| structured | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 7,058 competing apps Median installs: 409 Avg rating: 4.1 | 103 | 99 | 51 major competitor apps |
| structure | 72 | 100 | 37 | 62 5,024 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | 173 | 166 | 23 major competitor apps |
| member | 72 | 100 | 44 | 69 14,719 competing apps Median installs: 425 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 286 major competitor apps |
| section | 72 | 100 | 42 | 69 14,184 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 121 major competitor apps |
| conveniently | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 7,955 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 109 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 114,552 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,550 major competitor apps |
| provide | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 55,802 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 558 major competitor apps |
| various | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 48,693 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 723 major competitor apps |
| combination | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 8,444 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 147 major competitor apps |
| quickly | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 49,258 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 754 major competitor apps |
| view | 67 | 100 | 52 | 84 108,095 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,319 major competitor apps |
| area | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 16,759 competing apps Median installs: 399 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 207 major competitor apps |
| many | 68 | 100 | 50 | 81 76,838 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,349 major competitor apps |
| imperial | 71 | 100 | 32 | 53 1,612 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 13 major competitor apps |
| generate | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 23,815 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 215 major competitor apps |
| required | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 18,699 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 235 major competitor apps |
| conversions | 70 | 100 | 31 | 51 1,242 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 6 major competitor apps |
| provided | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 19,028 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 177 major competitor apps |
| select | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 52,057 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 802 major competitor apps |
| number | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 47,452 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 713 major competitor apps |
| several | 73 | 100 | 42 | 69 13,316 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 163 major competitor apps |
| options | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 24,771 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 468 major competitor apps |
| bar | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 7,549 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 76 major competitor apps |
| convert | 73 | 100 | 43 | 68 11,537 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 145 major competitor apps |
App Description
Application/Usage:
• Convert between combinations of bar sizes, steel area, and spacing requirements
• Select the required combination of bar sizes and spacing for given conversions using ASTM, Metric or Imperial standards
Target Users:
• Structural and civil engineers who need to view and select from various reinforcement layouts for a given criteria during member design
• Structural and civil engineers who need to quickly get the area of steel provided in a given section during member analysis
Key Features:
• Generate many reinforcement layouts
• Provide ability for combined reinforcement layouts
• User-defined rules for bar selection
• Provide several bar options for user-defined range
Key Input:
• Area
• Bar size
• Number of bars
• Bar spacing
• Combined reinforcement layouts
Key Output:
• Area for given reinforcement layouts
• Reinforcement layouts for given bar options and spacing requirements
• Alternative reinforcement layouts for given layouts