EDLM
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 48 keywords for EDLM in Apple App Store
EDLM tracks 48 keywords (2 keywords rank; 46 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.6, difficulty 40.9, best rank 14.
Tracked keywords
48
2 ranked • 46 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 14 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.6
Top keyword: external
Avg difficulty
40.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.3
external
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 93
- 63.7
stores
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 125
- 68.7
specifically
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 109
- 67.8
input
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 83
- 64.7
electronic
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 73
Unranked opportunities
external
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Competitors: 93
stores
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.0 • Competitors: 125
specifically
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Competitors: 109
input
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Competitors: 83
electronic
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 73
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 190,736 • Major competitors: 2,966
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
different
Total apps: 95,103 • Major competitors: 1,687
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.5
data
Total apps: 86,751 • Major competitors: 1,000
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
provides
Total apps: 72,728 • Major competitors: 564
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.5
check
Total apps: 65,344 • Major competitors: 1,266
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| latency | 70 | 100 | 33 | 49 812 competing apps Median installs: 900 Avg rating: 4.1 | 14 | 14 | 24 major competitor apps |
| delay | 71 | 100 | 36 | 57 2,457 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | 196 | 196 | 41 major competitor apps |
| external | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 6,924 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 93 major competitor apps |
| audio | 70 | 100 | 47 | 76 32,553 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 400 major competitor apps |
| used | 69 | 100 | 49 | 79 50,682 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 502 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 55 | 88 190,736 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,966 major competitor apps |
| connect | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 60,751 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 937 major competitor apps |
| accurate | 71 | 100 | 45 | 74 24,710 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 317 major competitor apps |
| stores | 73 | 100 | 45 | 64 6,368 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 125 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 49 | 81 72,728 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 564 major competitor apps |
| continuously | 72 | 100 | 38 | 62 4,856 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 62 major competitor apps |
| specifically | 73 | 100 | 42 | 69 12,699 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 109 major competitor apps |
| videos | 70 | 100 | 53 | 75 31,875 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 598 major competitor apps |
| check | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 65,344 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,266 major competitor apps |
| output | 72 | 100 | 37 | 60 3,797 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 27 major competitor apps |
| two | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 31,491 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 432 major competitor apps |
| different | 67 | 100 | 53 | 83 95,103 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,687 major competitor apps |
| sound | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 29,952 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 451 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 51 | 83 86,751 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,000 major competitor apps |
| requires | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 17,054 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 236 major competitor apps |
| points | 70 | 100 | 47 | 74 25,929 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 485 major competitor apps |
| cycle | 72 | 100 | 39 | 61 4,174 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 71 major competitor apps |
| meter | 71 | 100 | 36 | 58 2,813 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 52 major competitor apps |
| module | 72 | 100 | 35 | 59 3,224 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 7 major competitor apps |
| automated | 72 | 100 | 40 | 63 5,554 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 86 major competitor apps |
App Description
E-Drum Latency Meter was developed specifically for measuring latency in electronic drums. The app uses an audio adapter to connect to the input and output points of an e-drum system and provides automated and accurate latency measurements.
EDLM app sends a trigger pulse to the module while simultaneously recording and waiting for the drum sound to arrive. It then calculates and stores the time difference between the two moments. This cycle is continuously repeated at different intervals as the accumulated data is used to estimate the average latency and jitter amounts.
The app requires an external audio adapter or interface.