Tami's Tower

Developer: Smithsonian Institution

Category: Games

Add App to Comparison

700 installs

14 ratings

32 monthly active users

Revenue not available

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 58 keywords for Tami's Tower in Apple App Store

Developer: Smithsonian Institution Category: games Rating: 5

Tami's Tower tracks 58 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 58 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.8, difficulty 41.4.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 58 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.8

Top keyword: delicious

Avg difficulty

41.4

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

delicious

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 213
67.6
student

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 62
68.1
problem

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 123
65.3
second

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 168
67.9
needed

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 115
66.7

Unranked opportunities

delicious

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Competitors: 213
student

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 62
problem

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Competitors: 123
second

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 168
needed

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 115

High competition keywords

time

Total apps: 189,921 • Major competitors: 2,981

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
help

Total apps: 162,218 • Major competitors: 2,474

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
using

Total apps: 114,667 • Major competitors: 1,563

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.1
designed

Total apps: 114,004 • Major competitors: 1,089

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4
learn

Total apps: 78,843 • Major competitors: 1,088

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.9

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
level	68	100	50	79 55,864 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,185 major competitor apps
learn	67	100	52	81 78,843 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,088 major competitor apps
design	69	100	48	77 40,744 competing apps Median installs: 541 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	678 major competitor apps
used	69	100	49	78 50,553 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	504 major competitor apps
designed	66	100	51	84 114,004 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,089 major competitor apps
educational	71	100	45	73 24,487 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	209 major competitor apps
using	66	100	53	84 114,667 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,563 major competitor apps
time	65	100	55	88 189,921 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,981 major competitor apps
delicious	73	100	44	68 11,649 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	213 major competitor apps
provide	68	100	48	79 55,848 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	560 major competitor apps
basic	72	100	44	71 18,966 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	194 major competitor apps
help	65	100	55	87 162,218 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,474 major competitor apps
watch	69	100	51	79 52,967 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,065 major competitor apps
function	72	100	42	69 14,731 competing apps Median installs: 351 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	159 major competitor apps
monitor	70	100	46	75 34,229 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	376 major competitor apps
student	73	100	41	68 12,386 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	62 major competitor apps
students	72	100	43	71 18,939 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	76 major competitor apps
improve	69	100	48	77 45,056 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	633 major competitor apps
problem	73	100	40	65 8,474 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	123 major competitor apps
solve	72	100	45	70 17,240 competing apps Median installs: 850 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	415 major competitor apps
second	73	100	42	68 12,195 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	168 major competitor apps
needed	73	100	41	67 10,295 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	115 major competitor apps
teachers	73	100	40	65 7,712 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	59 major competitor apps
education	73	100	43	68 12,308 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	103 major competitor apps
fruit	72	100	36	57 2,763 competing apps Median installs: 524 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	51 major competitor apps

App Description

It’s lunch time and Tami, the golden lion tamarin, is hungry! Help Tami reach the delicious fruit by building a tower. But watch out! Other animals can cause Tami’s tower to topple over.

From the Smithsonian Science Education Center, Tami’s Tower: Let’s Think About Engineering is an educational engineering design game that will help teach your student how to design a solution to a problem using basic engineering design principles.

Educational features:

• Aligned to educational science standards for kindergarten through second grade
• Designed for emergent readers
• Grounded in educational psychology research
• Metacognitive prompts provide students an opportunity to monitor and assess their own confidence
• Teachers can assess student responses to metacognitive prompts through an in-game
summary screen
• In-game tutorial to teach students how to play
• Introduces students to engineering design principles
• Students will learn how the shape of an object can help it function as needed to solve a problem
• Students can reflect on previous attempts to improve design
• Students can design a level in Sandbox mode
• Designed to be used in the classroom or at home