Poop&Pee
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 48 keywords for Poop&Pee in Apple App Store
Poop&Pee tracks 48 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 48 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.4, difficulty 34.0.
Tracked keywords
48
0 ranked • 48 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.4
Top keyword: la
Avg difficulty
34.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.8
la
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 83
- 64.0
patient
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 32
- 66.1
charge
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 183
- 66.7
en
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 43
- 63.6
base
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 101
Unranked opportunities
la
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 83
patient
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Competitors: 32
charge
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Competitors: 183
en
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Competitors: 43
base
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Competitors: 101
High competition keywords
mobile
Total apps: 120,199 • Major competitors: 1,518
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.9
via
Total apps: 56,922 • Major competitors: 726
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.6
digital
Total apps: 46,497 • Major competitors: 661
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 47.8
web
Total apps: 19,926 • Major competitors: 239
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 43.8
de
Total apps: 17,818 • Major competitors: 89
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 43.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| via | 68 | 100 | 49 | 80 56,922 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 726 major competitor apps |
| digital | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 46,497 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 661 major competitor apps |
| la | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 9,804 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 83 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 120,199 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,518 major competitor apps |
| de | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 17,818 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 89 major competitor apps |
| diagnostic | 71 | 100 | 33 | 56 2,102 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 9 major competitor apps |
| le | 72 | 100 | 36 | 60 3,729 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 18 major competitor apps |
| patient | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 6,703 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 32 major competitor apps |
| charge | 73 | 100 | 40 | 66 8,892 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 183 major competitor apps |
| structure | 72 | 100 | 37 | 61 4,475 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 22 major competitor apps |
| web | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 19,926 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 239 major competitor apps |
| est | 70 | 100 | 32 | 53 1,405 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 5 major competitor apps |
| par | 70 | 100 | 32 | 53 1,467 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 5 major competitor apps |
| il | 71 | 100 | 32 | 54 1,691 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| assure | 69 | 100 | 28 | 46 594 competing apps Median installs: 88 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 6 major competitor apps |
| et | 71 | 100 | 35 | 57 2,616 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 10 major competitor apps |
| en | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 9,639 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 43 major competitor apps |
| ou | 71 | 100 | 38 | 58 2,884 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 31 major competitor apps |
| et des | 68 | 100 | 25 | 42 311 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 0 major competitor apps |
| son | 71 | 100 | 33 | 54 1,773 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 14 major competitor apps |
| base | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 6,296 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 101 major competitor apps |
| relatives | 69 | 100 | 29 | 47 673 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 10 major competitor apps |
| du | 71 | 100 | 34 | 57 2,462 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 6 major competitor apps |
| au | 71 | 100 | 32 | 53 1,571 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 8 major competitor apps |
| un | 72 | 100 | 37 | 62 4,754 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 16 major competitor apps |
App Description
Pour ce faire, le patient saisit les données relatives à sa propreté (selles et urines) et à ses prises de repas (boissons et aliments) via l’application mobile ou web. Le médecin qui assure son suivi accède à ces données sous forme de graphiques via une plateforme web sécurisée.
Les objectifs de cet outil visent à affiner le diagnostic pour adopter la meilleure stratégie thérapeutique, assurer une meilleure prise en charge du patient sur la base d’un historique fiable et ainsi améliorer sa qualité de vie.
Elle mise pour cela sur 3 aspects majeurs :
• EDUQUER en incitant le patient à devenir acteur de sa santé
• FACILITER le recueil des données patient en s’affranchissant du calendrier papier
• ANALYSER en personnalisant la présentation des données en fonction de la pathologie
L’application est proposée par la filière de santé maladies rares NeuroSphinx, structure publique qui coordonne les acteurs de la prise en charge des malformations pelviennes et médullaires rares avec atteintes sphinctériennes. NeuroSphinx est hébergée par l’hôpital Necker – Enfants malades.