Poop&Pee
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 48 keywords for Poop&Pee in Apple App Store
Poop&Pee tracks 48 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 48 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 38.7, difficulty 26.4.
Tracked keywords
48
0 ranked • 48 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
38.7
Top keyword: via
Avg difficulty
26.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 75.1
via
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 427
- 72.3
digital
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 339
- 81.3
mobile
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 60.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 846
- 60.0
charge
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 98
- 63.6
web
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 127
Unranked opportunities
via
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.0 • Competitors: 427
digital
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.9 • Competitors: 339
mobile
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 60.2 • Competitors: 846
charge
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 98
web
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.4 • Competitors: 127
High competition keywords
mobile
Total apps: 3,947 • Major competitors: 846
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.2
via
Total apps: 2,102 • Major competitors: 427
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
digital
Total apps: 1,579 • Major competitors: 339
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.9
web
Total apps: 645 • Major competitors: 127
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 45.4
charge
Total apps: 451 • Major competitors: 98
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 42.2
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| via | 58 | 100 | 55 | 75 2,102 competing apps Median installs: 260,250 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 427 major competitor apps |
| digital | 58 | 100 | 52 | 72 1,579 competing apps Median installs: 256,800 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 339 major competitor apps |
| la | 57 | 100 | 38 | 53 216 competing apps Median installs: 262,288 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 44 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 58 | 100 | 60 | 81 3,947 competing apps Median installs: 251,675 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 846 major competitor apps |
| de | 57 | 100 | 36 | 54 236 competing apps Median installs: 202,262 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 31 major competitor apps |
| diagnostic | 56 | 100 | 23 | 35 36 competing apps Median installs: 178,900 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 3 major competitor apps |
| le | 57 | 100 | 27 | 38 47 competing apps Median installs: 234,150 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 6 major competitor apps |
| patient | 57 | 100 | 30 | 45 94 competing apps Median installs: 207,600 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 14 major competitor apps |
| charge | 58 | 100 | 42 | 60 451 competing apps Median installs: 247,525 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 98 major competitor apps |
| structure | 57 | 100 | 29 | 40 59 competing apps Median installs: 280,500 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 10 major competitor apps |
| web | 58 | 100 | 45 | 64 645 competing apps Median installs: 249,600 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 127 major competitor apps |
| est | 56 | 100 | 19 | 29 18 competing apps Median installs: 283,762 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 3 major competitor apps |
| par | 56 | 100 | 19 | 28 16 competing apps Median installs: 221,525 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| il | 0 | 56 | 16 | 20 7 competing apps Median installs: 171,975 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| assure | 56 | 100 | 21 | 28 17 competing apps Median installs: 263,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 4 major competitor apps |
| et | 20 | 100 | 43 | 30 20 competing apps Median installs: 555,450 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 8 major competitor apps |
| en | 57 | 100 | 39 | 48 138 competing apps Median installs: 216,238 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 21 major competitor apps |
| ou | 57 | 100 | 27 | 40 57 competing apps Median installs: 179,575 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 8 major competitor apps |
| et des | 0 | 9 | 5 | 7 1 competing apps Median installs: 263,050 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 0 major competitor apps |
| son | 57 | 100 | 29 | 37 41 competing apps Median installs: 280,450 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 6 major competitor apps |
| base | 57 | 100 | 38 | 54 239 competing apps Median installs: 263,800 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 47 major competitor apps |
| relatives | 56 | 100 | 25 | 31 22 competing apps Median installs: 279,225 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 5 major competitor apps |
| du | 56 | 100 | 21 | 31 22 competing apps Median installs: 184,650 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
| au | 56 | 100 | 19 | 29 18 competing apps Median installs: 171,612 Avg rating: 4.5 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| un | 57 | 100 | 27 | 41 64 competing apps Median installs: 194,088 Avg rating: 4.8 | — | — | 8 major competitor apps |
App Description
Pour ce faire, le patient saisit les données relatives à sa propreté (selles et urines) et à ses prises de repas (boissons et aliments) via l’application mobile ou web. Le médecin qui assure son suivi accède à ces données sous forme de graphiques via une plateforme web sécurisée.
Les objectifs de cet outil visent à affiner le diagnostic pour adopter la meilleure stratégie thérapeutique, assurer une meilleure prise en charge du patient sur la base d’un historique fiable et ainsi améliorer sa qualité de vie.
Elle mise pour cela sur 3 aspects majeurs :
• EDUQUER en incitant le patient à devenir acteur de sa santé
• FACILITER le recueil des données patient en s’affranchissant du calendrier papier
• ANALYSER en personnalisant la présentation des données en fonction de la pathologie
L’application est proposée par la filière de santé maladies rares NeuroSphinx, structure publique qui coordonne les acteurs de la prise en charge des malformations pelviennes et médullaires rares avec atteintes sphinctériennes. NeuroSphinx est hébergée par l’hôpital Necker – Enfants malades.
AppGoblin