T.A.C.O

Developer: The University of

Category: Medical

Add App to Comparison

100 installs

2.00 ratings

8.00 monthly active users

Revenue not available

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 31 keywords for T.A.C.O in Apple App Store

Developer: The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Category: medical Rating: 3

T.A.C.O tracks 31 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 31 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.3, difficulty 40.4.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 31 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.3

Top keyword: storage

Avg difficulty

40.4

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

storage

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 134
66.5
benefit

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 118
65.5
patients

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 37.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 36
62.5
center

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 200
69.5
capturing

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 37.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 26
59.6

Unranked opportunities

storage

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Competitors: 134
benefit

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Competitors: 118
patients

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 37.9 • Competitors: 36
center

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.7 • Competitors: 200
capturing

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 37.0 • Competitors: 26

High competition keywords

time

Total apps: 190,736 • Major competitors: 2,966

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
data

Total apps: 86,751 • Major competitors: 1,000

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
allows

Total apps: 80,365 • Major competitors: 658

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.9
multiple

Total apps: 68,625 • Major competitors: 1,107

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.6
used

Total apps: 50,682 • Major competitors: 502

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.9

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
collection	70	100	47	75 30,231 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	518 major competitor apps
used	69	100	49	79 50,682 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	502 major competitor apps
storage	73	100	44	67 9,468 competing apps Median installs: 564 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	134 major competitor apps
aimed	71	100	34	56 2,207 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	16 major competitor apps
secure	69	100	50	78 44,453 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	702 major competitor apps
time	65	100	55	88 190,736 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,966 major competitor apps
customizable	71	100	45	72 18,972 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	348 major competitor apps
multiple	68	100	51	81 68,625 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,107 major competitor apps
patients	72	100	38	62 5,417 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	36 major competitor apps
run	71	100	46	73 22,428 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	499 major competitor apps
center	72	100	44	69 14,212 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	200 major competitor apps
benefit	73	100	42	65 8,184 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	118 major competitor apps
allows	67	100	50	82 80,365 competing apps Median installs: 374 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	658 major competitor apps
applied	71	100	36	58 2,789 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	38 major competitor apps
capturing	72	100	37	60 3,647 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	26 major competitor apps
data	67	100	51	83 86,751 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,000 major competitor apps
data collection	70	100	32	53 1,455 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	7 major competitor apps
scientific	72	100	39	62 5,087 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	57 major competitor apps
technology	70	100	46	74 25,884 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	305 major competitor apps
results	71	100	44	73 21,538 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	222 major competitor apps
studies	71	100	35	57 2,652 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	31 major competitor apps
evaluate	71	100	35	58 2,872 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	13 major competitor apps
capture	71	100	47	72 20,280 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	257 major competitor apps
interventions	69	100	26	44 414 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	0 major competitor apps
clinical	72	100	38	63 5,443 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	26 major competitor apps

App Description

Technology Applied for Capturing Outcomes (T.A.C.O.), a customizable app that allows real-time capture of clinical outcomes.

- HIPAA compliant data collection and storage on secure servers
- Multiple studies can run simultaneously
- Multi-center capability
- Results will be used to evaluate interventions aimed to benefit patients and facilitate clinical and scientific advancement