T.A.C.O

Developer: The University of

Category: Medical

~100 - 200

2 ratings

~100 (installs week)

Trend Steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 31 keywords for T.A.C.O in Apple App Store

Developer: The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Category: medical Rating: 3

T.A.C.O tracks 31 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 31 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 50.6, difficulty 38.8.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 31 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

50.6

Top keyword: time

Avg difficulty

38.8

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

time

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,805
88.7
collection

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 48.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 276
70.1
used

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 279
71.8
secure

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 56.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 351
73.0
customizable

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 47.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 173
66.3

Unranked opportunities

time

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Competitors: 1,805
collection

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 48.5 • Competitors: 276
used

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.9 • Competitors: 279
secure

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 56.4 • Competitors: 351
customizable

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 47.5 • Competitors: 173

High competition keywords

time

Total apps: 8,391 • Major competitors: 1,805

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.9
multiple

Total apps: 2,846 • Major competitors: 550

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.5
data

Total apps: 2,494 • Major competitors: 472

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.6
allows

Total apps: 2,119 • Major competitors: 351

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.2
secure

Total apps: 1,691 • Major competitors: 351

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.4

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
collection	58	100	48	70 1,259 competing apps Median installs: 268,700 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	276 major competitor apps
used	58	100	53	72 1,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,800 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	279 major competitor apps
storage	57	100	46	58 374 competing apps Median installs: 221,600 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	74 major competitor apps
aimed	57	100	25	37 43 competing apps Median installs: 307,975 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	9 major competitor apps
secure	58	100	56	73 1,691 competing apps Median installs: 245,175 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	351 major competitor apps
time	59	100	63	89 8,391 competing apps Median installs: 259,600 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	1,805 major competitor apps
customizable	58	100	48	66 855 competing apps Median installs: 250,875 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	173 major competitor apps
multiple	58	100	54	78 2,846 competing apps Median installs: 239,425 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	550 major competitor apps
patients	57	100	30	45 99 competing apps Median installs: 221,425 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	21 major competitor apps
run	58	100	47	70 1,204 competing apps Median installs: 261,300 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	249 major competitor apps
center	58	100	47	62 552 competing apps Median installs: 240,312 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	107 major competitor apps
benefit	57	100	46	54 235 competing apps Median installs: 297,400 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	57 major competitor apps
allows	58	100	50	75 2,119 competing apps Median installs: 225,625 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	351 major competitor apps
applied	20	100	36	46 107 competing apps Median installs: 255,675 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	28 major competitor apps
capturing	57	100	32	46 111 competing apps Median installs: 174,575 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	18 major competitor apps
data	58	100	55	77 2,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,338 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	472 major competitor apps
data collection	56	100	26	27 15 competing apps Median installs: 154,050 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	2 major competitor apps
scientific	57	100	36	48 136 competing apps Median installs: 239,950 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	22 major competitor apps
technology	58	100	46	66 791 competing apps Median installs: 243,000 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	161 major competitor apps
results	58	100	43	64 668 competing apps Median installs: 213,000 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	120 major competitor apps
studies	57	100	29	43 79 competing apps Median installs: 287,600 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	14 major competitor apps
evaluate	57	100	26	38 48 competing apps Median installs: 185,075 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	5 major competitor apps
capture	58	100	51	63 623 competing apps Median installs: 255,950 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	124 major competitor apps
interventions	0	18	12	11 2 competing apps Median installs: 1,349,725 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	1 major competitor apps
clinical	57	100	34	45 97 competing apps Median installs: 156,075 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	13 major competitor apps

App Description

Technology Applied for Capturing Outcomes (T.A.C.O.), a customizable app that allows real-time capture of clinical outcomes.

- HIPAA compliant data collection and storage on secure servers
- Multiple studies can run simultaneously
- Multi-center capability
- Results will be used to evaluate interventions aimed to benefit patients and facilitate clinical and scientific advancement