Brayden Online
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 119 keywords for Brayden Online in Apple App Store
Brayden Online tracks 119 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 119 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.0, difficulty 39.3.
Tracked keywords
119
0 ranked • 119 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.0
Top keyword: changes
Avg difficulty
39.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.5
changes
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 203
- 66.8
healthcare
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 83
- 64.6
patient
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 33
- 68.2
professionals
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 71
- 65.5
baby
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 205
Unranked opportunities
changes
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Competitors: 203
healthcare
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 83
patient
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 33
professionals
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 71
baby
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Competitors: 205
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 189,727 • Major competitors: 2,958
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
help
Total apps: 162,255 • Major competitors: 2,471
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
easy
Total apps: 141,451 • Major competitors: 2,047
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.0
designed
Total apps: 113,897 • Major competitors: 1,081
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4
perfect
Total apps: 100,589 • Major competitors: 1,622
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| online | 68 | 100 | 52 | 81 73,707 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,307 major competitor apps |
| changes | 73 | 100 | 44 | 69 13,199 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 203 major competitor apps |
| easy | 66 | 100 | 53 | 86 141,451 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,047 major competitor apps |
| via | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 56,643 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 760 major competitor apps |
| heart | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 15,954 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 271 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 45 | 71 19,937 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 194 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 51 | 84 113,897 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,081 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 55 | 88 189,727 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,958 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 49 | 80 62,211 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 549 major competitor apps |
| rate | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 21,519 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 309 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 162,255 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,471 major competitor apps |
| intuitive | 68 | 100 | 49 | 79 58,942 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 604 major competitor apps |
| perfect | 67 | 100 | 52 | 83 100,589 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,622 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 76,389 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,127 major competitor apps |
| score | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 23,635 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 439 major competitor apps |
| take | 67 | 100 | 52 | 83 95,116 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,732 major competitor apps |
| healthcare | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,418 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 83 major competitor apps |
| pro | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 24,595 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 469 major competitor apps |
| others | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 15,913 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 247 major competitor apps |
| skills | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 41,669 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 931 major competitor apps |
| hands | 72 | 100 | 39 | 62 5,078 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 97 major competitor apps |
| provides | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 72,500 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 565 major competitor apps |
| quality | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 58,838 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 786 major competitor apps |
| patient | 73 | 100 | 39 | 65 7,649 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 33 major competitor apps |
| easily | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 85,281 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,267 major competitor apps |
App Description
The App allows healthcare professionals (and others with a duty to respond) to practice and perfect their adult and infant CPR skills via intuitive real-time feedback. This includes the key CPR competencies such as chest compression depth, rate and recoil, hand/finger position, hands off time (or Chest Compression Fraction (CCF)). The App also provides ventilation performance feedback (volume, rate/frequency and speed). Ventilation feedback is especially important for infant resuscitation and the Brayden Online App allows for the current differing algorithm requirements for the AHA and the ERC.
The App allows trainees to practice with real-time feedback to help guide them as well as take assessments without guidance. The numeric objective feedback provided after training is comprehensive, designed to be easy and quick to understand and covers all the key CPR competencies required to perform high quality CPR. An overall score is provided and performance across eight key competencies is intuitively presented to easily identify strengths and weaknesses.
Additional in-depth analysis is provided for each key CPR competency performed together with performance over multiple cycles of CPR. This is especially useful for reviewing performance changes over prolonged periods of CPR.