Good vs. Poor UX
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 38 keywords for Good vs. Poor UX in Apple App Store
Good vs. Poor UX tracks 38 keywords (15 keywords rank; 23 need traction). Key metrics: 20% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.3, difficulty 39.6, best rank 7.
Tracked keywords
38
15 ranked • 23 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
20%
Best rank 7 • Latest leader 28
Avg opportunity
70.3
Top keyword: friendly interface
Avg difficulty
39.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.5
friendly interface
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Rank 28
Competitors: 64
- 67.6
hope
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 112
- 68.7
yet
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 207
- 68.6
development
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 125
- 68.0
deliver
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 167
Unranked opportunities
hope
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.0 • Competitors: 112
yet
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Competitors: 207
development
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 125
deliver
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.7 • Competitors: 167
experiences
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Competitors: 132
High competition keywords
find
Total apps: 139,104 • Major competitors: 2,765
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.2
experience
Total apps: 122,490 • Major competitors: 2,155
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.1
different
Total apps: 95,103 • Major competitors: 1,687
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.5
user
Total apps: 66,932 • Major competitors: 967
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.1
digital
Total apps: 46,511 • Major competitors: 703
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| modern interface | 69 | 100 | 28 | 47 611 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.4 | 7 | 7 | 3 major competitor apps |
| interface designed | 71 | 100 | 33 | 54 1,760 competing apps Median installs: 340 Avg rating: 4.2 | 9 | 9 | 13 major competitor apps |
| user interface | 72 | 100 | 37 | 61 4,266 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | 10 | 10 | 24 major competitor apps |
| user experience | 71 | 100 | 36 | 57 2,643 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | 15 | 15 | 28 major competitor apps |
| interface design | 68 | 100 | 26 | 42 318 competing apps Median installs: 1,225 Avg rating: 4.2 | 20 | 19 | 3 major competitor apps |
| interface ensures | 70 | 100 | 30 | 50 1,026 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | 24 | 24 | 5 major competitor apps |
| friendly interface | 73 | 100 | 40 | 66 8,260 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | 28 | 25 | 64 major competitor apps |
| usability | 69 | 100 | 28 | 47 643 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | 27 | 27 | 4 major competitor apps |
| demonstration | 69 | 100 | 29 | 47 670 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | 33 | 33 | 2 major competitor apps |
| poor | 71 | 100 | 34 | 54 1,766 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | 44 | 37 | 26 major competitor apps |
| interface | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 39,818 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | 51 | 44 | 327 major competitor apps |
| best experience | 70 | 100 | 34 | 51 1,127 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | 96 | 96 | 22 major competitor apps |
| examples | 71 | 100 | 35 | 57 2,635 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | 135 | 134 | 13 major competitor apps |
| demo | 71 | 100 | 35 | 57 2,480 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 3.9 | 182 | 182 | 14 major competitor apps |
| example | 72 | 100 | 37 | 61 4,346 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | 188 | 188 | 42 major competitor apps |
| experience | 66 | 100 | 54 | 85 122,490 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,155 major competitor apps |
| digital | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 46,511 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 703 major competitor apps |
| design | 69 | 100 | 48 | 76 36,638 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 671 major competitor apps |
| educational | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 22,308 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 207 major competitor apps |
| find | 66 | 100 | 55 | 86 139,104 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,765 major competitor apps |
| hope | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 10,938 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 112 major competitor apps |
| good | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 32,154 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 580 major competitor apps |
| yet | 73 | 100 | 43 | 69 12,766 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 207 major competitor apps |
| meet | 70 | 100 | 48 | 74 26,932 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 537 major competitor apps |
| ever | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 23,165 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 529 major competitor apps |
App Description
This app illustrates how two digital experiences can meet the same set of requirements—on paper—yet deliver wildly different results.
Check out some extreme examples of good vs. poor design and development practices. We hope you find it educational or at the very least, amusing. :-)