MyPacer
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 69 keywords for MyPacer in Apple App Store
MyPacer tracks 69 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 69 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.1, difficulty 38.4.
Tracked keywords
69
0 ranked • 69 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.1
Top keyword: hope
Avg difficulty
38.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.6
hope
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 64
- 64.0
university
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 12
- 65.0
participate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 85
- 68.0
done
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 127
- 66.4
mix
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 163
Unranked opportunities
hope
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 64
university
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Competitors: 12
participate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Competitors: 85
done
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 127
mix
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Competitors: 163
High competition keywords
help
Total apps: 149,551 • Major competitors: 1,511
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.5
mobile
Total apps: 119,815 • Major competitors: 990
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4
using
Total apps: 115,696 • Major competitors: 949
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3
track
Total apps: 108,505 • Major competitors: 988
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.0
simple
Total apps: 98,347 • Major competitors: 877
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| board | 72 | 100 | 42 | 70 14,670 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 199 major competitor apps |
| better | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 41,806 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 457 major competitor apps |
| range | 69 | 100 | 46 | 77 37,773 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 330 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 115,696 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 949 major competitor apps |
| hope | 73 | 100 | 41 | 68 10,922 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 64 major competitor apps |
| available | 67 | 100 | 51 | 83 88,960 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,161 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 119,815 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 990 major competitor apps |
| goal | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 20,376 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 188 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 53 | 87 149,551 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,511 major competitor apps |
| video | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 46,177 competing apps Median installs: 175 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 547 major competitor apps |
| university | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 6,659 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 12 major competitor apps |
| patients | 72 | 100 | 38 | 63 5,424 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 21 major competitor apps |
| track | 66 | 100 | 51 | 84 108,505 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 988 major competitor apps |
| join | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 43,600 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.4 | — | — | 903 major competitor apps |
| simple | 67 | 100 | 50 | 84 98,347 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 877 major competitor apps |
| participate | 73 | 100 | 39 | 65 7,616 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 85 major competitor apps |
| convenience | 72 | 100 | 43 | 70 15,850 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 105 major competitor apps |
| across | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 45,843 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 641 major competitor apps |
| done | 73 | 100 | 41 | 68 11,508 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 127 major competitor apps |
| anywhere | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 27,027 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 323 major competitor apps |
| trials | 70 | 100 | 30 | 50 908 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 13 major competitor apps |
| understand | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 26,539 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 141 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 50 | 83 86,168 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 608 major competitor apps |
| home | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 52,123 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 719 major competitor apps |
| clinic | 71 | 100 | 33 | 54 1,689 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 10 major competitor apps |
App Description
experiences.
Our goal is to reach a broader range of myositis patients across the country through telemedicine. Using
technology, we hope to overcome geographic barriers and ultimately allow patients to participate in
clinical studies from the convenience of their home.
This mobile application uses a mix of questionnaires and surveys, simple tests, as well as a Fitbit Activity
to track your myositis symptoms and experiences. Study doctor will evaluate patients using secure
telemedicine (audio-video chat).
We believe that the My Pacer study will accelerate myositis research and lead to better clinical trials in
myositis. We hope the findings from this study will help myositis patients in the future.
Adult Patients living in US with a diagnosis of polymyositis, dermatomyositis and necrotizing myopathy
can join the study.
Study participation can be done from your home or anywhere else, using the My Pacer study app or
website. Currently, the study is only available in English.
It is an observational study. No clinic visits or experimental drugs are required.
All procedures in this study have been reviewed by the Institutional Review Board at the University of
Pittsburgh. Your coded data is secured in a University of Pittsburgh’s database.