MyPacer
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 69 keywords for MyPacer in Apple App Store
MyPacer tracks 69 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 69 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.3, difficulty 39.5.
Tracked keywords
69
0 ranked • 69 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.3
Top keyword: hope
Avg difficulty
39.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.5
hope
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 150
- 64.1
university
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 39
- 62.1
patients
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 37.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 43
- 64.4
participate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 180
- 67.5
done
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 281
Unranked opportunities
hope
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 150
university
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 39
patients
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 37.5 • Competitors: 43
participate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 180
done
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Competitors: 281
High competition keywords
help
Total apps: 162,336 • Major competitors: 3,371
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.5
mobile
Total apps: 130,149 • Major competitors: 2,094
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.1
track
Total apps: 125,835 • Major competitors: 2,073
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.5
using
Total apps: 114,483 • Major competitors: 2,227
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.7
simple
Total apps: 109,609 • Major competitors: 2,066
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| board | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 15,809 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 410 major competitor apps |
| better | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 41,393 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 980 major competitor apps |
| range | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 41,541 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 836 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 114,483 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,227 major competitor apps |
| hope | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 11,485 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 150 major competitor apps |
| available | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 95,796 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,470 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 130,149 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,094 major competitor apps |
| goal | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 22,286 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 437 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 162,336 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 3,371 major competitor apps |
| video | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 49,611 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,319 major competitor apps |
| university | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 7,176 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 39 major competitor apps |
| patients | 73 | 100 | 37 | 62 5,403 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 43 major competitor apps |
| track | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 125,835 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 2,073 major competitor apps |
| join | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 49,611 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.4 | — | — | 1,825 major competitor apps |
| simple | 66 | 100 | 52 | 84 109,609 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,066 major competitor apps |
| participate | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 7,517 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 180 major competitor apps |
| convenience | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 18,061 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 257 major competitor apps |
| across | 69 | 100 | 52 | 77 45,183 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 1,374 major competitor apps |
| done | 73 | 100 | 44 | 67 11,402 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 281 major competitor apps |
| anywhere | 71 | 100 | 46 | 74 26,787 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 688 major competitor apps |
| trials | 70 | 100 | 30 | 49 897 competing apps Median installs: 900 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 36 major competitor apps |
| understand | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 26,185 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 344 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 51 | 83 97,788 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,437 major competitor apps |
| home | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 57,768 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,568 major competitor apps |
| clinic | 71 | 100 | 33 | 55 1,929 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 24 major competitor apps |
App Description
experiences.
Our goal is to reach a broader range of myositis patients across the country through telemedicine. Using
technology, we hope to overcome geographic barriers and ultimately allow patients to participate in
clinical studies from the convenience of their home.
This mobile application uses a mix of questionnaires and surveys, simple tests, as well as a Fitbit Activity
to track your myositis symptoms and experiences. Study doctor will evaluate patients using secure
telemedicine (audio-video chat).
We believe that the My Pacer study will accelerate myositis research and lead to better clinical trials in
myositis. We hope the findings from this study will help myositis patients in the future.
Adult Patients living in US with a diagnosis of polymyositis, dermatomyositis and necrotizing myopathy
can join the study.
Study participation can be done from your home or anywhere else, using the My Pacer study app or
website. Currently, the study is only available in English.
It is an observational study. No clinic visits or experimental drugs are required.
All procedures in this study have been reviewed by the Institutional Review Board at the University of
Pittsburgh. Your coded data is secured in a University of Pittsburgh’s database.