MyPacer
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 69 keywords for MyPacer in Apple App Store
MyPacer tracks 69 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 69 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 51.9, difficulty 39.1.
Tracked keywords
69
0 ranked • 69 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
51.9
Top keyword: help
Avg difficulty
39.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 85.2
help
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 61.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,236
- 64.6
board
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 44.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 166
- 74.7
better
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 450
- 70.5
range
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 48.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 261
- 82.6
using
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 61.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 924
Unranked opportunities
help
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 61.1 • Competitors: 1,236
board
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 44.5 • Competitors: 166
better
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.5 • Competitors: 450
range
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 48.4 • Competitors: 261
using
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 61.4 • Competitors: 924
High competition keywords
help
Total apps: 5,873 • Major competitors: 1,236
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.1
using
Total apps: 4,473 • Major competitors: 924
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.4
us
Total apps: 4,260 • Major competitors: 915
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
available
Total apps: 4,074 • Major competitors: 979
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.5
mobile
Total apps: 3,947 • Major competitors: 846
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.2
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| board | 58 | 100 | 44 | 65 720 competing apps Median installs: 275,762 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 166 major competitor apps |
| better | 58 | 100 | 53 | 75 2,000 competing apps Median installs: 250,162 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 450 major competitor apps |
| range | 58 | 100 | 48 | 71 1,314 competing apps Median installs: 239,262 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 261 major competitor apps |
| using | 58 | 100 | 61 | 83 4,473 competing apps Median installs: 247,200 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 924 major competitor apps |
| hope | 57 | 100 | 38 | 57 322 competing apps Median installs: 206,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 52 major competitor apps |
| available | 58 | 100 | 64 | 82 4,074 competing apps Median installs: 282,412 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 979 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 58 | 100 | 60 | 81 3,947 competing apps Median installs: 251,675 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 846 major competitor apps |
| goal | 58 | 100 | 44 | 65 764 competing apps Median installs: 244,162 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 151 major competitor apps |
| help | 59 | 100 | 61 | 85 5,873 competing apps Median installs: 257,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,236 major competitor apps |
| video | 58 | 100 | 56 | 76 2,262 competing apps Median installs: 268,550 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 467 major competitor apps |
| university | 57 | 100 | 31 | 41 67 competing apps Median installs: 211,800 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 11 major competitor apps |
| patients | 57 | 100 | 30 | 45 99 competing apps Median installs: 221,425 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 21 major competitor apps |
| track | 58 | 100 | 60 | 80 3,456 competing apps Median installs: 263,688 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 822 major competitor apps |
| join | 20 | 100 | 61 | 78 2,756 competing apps Median installs: 306,512 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 739 major competitor apps |
| simple | 58 | 100 | 54 | 80 3,416 competing apps Median installs: 254,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 695 major competitor apps |
| participate | 57 | 100 | 42 | 59 398 competing apps Median installs: 284,438 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 91 major competitor apps |
| convenience | 58 | 100 | 49 | 59 415 competing apps Median installs: 284,625 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 89 major competitor apps |
| across | 20 | 100 | 63 | 77 2,646 competing apps Median installs: 290,838 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 672 major competitor apps |
| done | 58 | 100 | 48 | 62 564 competing apps Median installs: 250,900 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 120 major competitor apps |
| anywhere | 58 | 100 | 51 | 71 1,385 competing apps Median installs: 262,300 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 320 major competitor apps |
| trials | 57 | 100 | 27 | 41 65 competing apps Median installs: 299,450 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 10 major competitor apps |
| understand | 58 | 100 | 44 | 65 776 competing apps Median installs: 244,462 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 142 major competitor apps |
| data | 58 | 100 | 55 | 77 2,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,338 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 472 major competitor apps |
| home | 58 | 100 | 58 | 77 2,496 competing apps Median installs: 285,338 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 622 major competitor apps |
| clinic | 57 | 100 | 29 | 38 49 competing apps Median installs: 254,350 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 8 major competitor apps |
App Description
experiences.
Our goal is to reach a broader range of myositis patients across the country through telemedicine. Using
technology, we hope to overcome geographic barriers and ultimately allow patients to participate in
clinical studies from the convenience of their home.
This mobile application uses a mix of questionnaires and surveys, simple tests, as well as a Fitbit Activity
to track your myositis symptoms and experiences. Study doctor will evaluate patients using secure
telemedicine (audio-video chat).
We believe that the My Pacer study will accelerate myositis research and lead to better clinical trials in
myositis. We hope the findings from this study will help myositis patients in the future.
Adult Patients living in US with a diagnosis of polymyositis, dermatomyositis and necrotizing myopathy
can join the study.
Study participation can be done from your home or anywhere else, using the My Pacer study app or
website. Currently, the study is only available in English.
It is an observational study. No clinic visits or experimental drugs are required.
All procedures in this study have been reviewed by the Institutional Review Board at the University of
Pittsburgh. Your coded data is secured in a University of Pittsburgh’s database.