Wagyu Feed Calculator
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 70 keywords for Wagyu Feed Calculator in Apple App Store
Wagyu Feed Calculator tracks 70 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 70 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.2, difficulty 38.4.
Tracked keywords
70
0 ranked • 70 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.2
Top keyword: feed
Avg difficulty
38.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.3
feed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 106
- 67.0
weight
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 86
- 68.2
energy
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 75
- 65.6
animals
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 67
- 67.8
amount
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 89
Unranked opportunities
feed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Competitors: 106
weight
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Competitors: 86
energy
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Competitors: 75
animals
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 67
amount
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 89
High competition keywords
help
Total apps: 146,877 • Major competitors: 1,244
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
using
Total apps: 116,658 • Major competitors: 765
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3
different
Total apps: 93,983 • Major competitors: 830
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.3
easily
Total apps: 87,008 • Major competitors: 617
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.1
allows
Total apps: 81,026 • Major competitors: 279
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| feed | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 11,829 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 106 major competitor apps |
| range | 69 | 100 | 46 | 77 37,302 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 273 major competitor apps |
| simply | 69 | 100 | 47 | 78 45,292 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 300 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 116,658 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 765 major competitor apps |
| built | 70 | 100 | 45 | 75 28,263 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 142 major competitor apps |
| rate | 71 | 100 | 43 | 72 19,671 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 144 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 52 | 87 146,877 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,244 major competitor apps |
| group | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 22,786 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 160 major competitor apps |
| test | 69 | 100 | 46 | 77 37,695 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 400 major competitor apps |
| test results | 69 | 100 | 29 | 48 709 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4 major competitor apps |
| quality | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 51,848 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 377 major competitor apps |
| easily | 67 | 100 | 50 | 83 87,008 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 617 major competitor apps |
| develop | 72 | 100 | 42 | 70 14,838 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 95 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 49 | 82 81,026 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 279 major competitor apps |
| producer | 69 | 100 | 27 | 46 518 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 0 major competitor apps |
| guide | 70 | 100 | 45 | 75 30,321 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 159 major competitor apps |
| user | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 64,842 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 457 major competitor apps |
| enter | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 24,285 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 188 major competitor apps |
| required | 71 | 100 | 43 | 72 19,100 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 122 major competitor apps |
| weight | 73 | 100 | 40 | 67 9,935 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 86 major competitor apps |
| two | 70 | 100 | 45 | 75 31,826 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 221 major competitor apps |
| requirement | 70 | 100 | 30 | 50 994 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 4 major competitor apps |
| different | 67 | 100 | 50 | 83 93,983 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 830 major competitor apps |
| developing | 72 | 100 | 37 | 61 4,388 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 26 major competitor apps |
| select | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 47,295 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 430 major competitor apps |
App Description
The calculator incorporates NSW DPI growth calculations enabling the user to compare the cost of one or two feeds on an energy and protein basis, as well as develop a feed 'mix' using these feeds. The user can select from a range of feeds and use the estimated average feed quality values or enter their own values from a feed test.
The app calculates:
1. The pasture DMI (kg/hd/day)
2. Percent of energy requirement from pasture
3. Estimated weight gain from pasture (kg/day)
4. Amount of supplementary feed required (kg/hd/day)
5. Total supplement cost
Farmers can easily assess the value of different feeds by simply comparing these results for two feeds as well as a mixed ration. There are 71 different feeds to select from, each with their own estimated average energy, protein and dry matter values. Values can be easily overwritten when feed test results are available. There are a number of warnings built in to help guide the busy producer when developing a ration.