Wagyu Feed Calculator
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 70 keywords for Wagyu Feed Calculator in Apple App Store
Wagyu Feed Calculator tracks 70 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 70 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.2, difficulty 38.9.
Tracked keywords
70
0 ranked • 70 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.2
Top keyword: feed
Avg difficulty
38.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.4
feed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 82
- 67.1
weight
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 60
- 68.3
energy
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 70
- 65.4
animals
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 54
- 67.6
amount
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 74
Unranked opportunities
feed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 82
weight
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 60
energy
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Competitors: 70
animals
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Competitors: 54
amount
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Competitors: 74
High competition keywords
help
Total apps: 150,250 • Major competitors: 834
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.0
using
Total apps: 115,141 • Major competitors: 603
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.8
different
Total apps: 95,103 • Major competitors: 660
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.6
easily
Total apps: 85,676 • Major competitors: 450
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.9
allows
Total apps: 80,365 • Major competitors: 301
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| feed | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 12,244 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 82 major competitor apps |
| range | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 37,834 competing apps Median installs: 850 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 186 major competitor apps |
| simply | 69 | 100 | 47 | 78 44,654 competing apps Median installs: 850 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 254 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 115,141 competing apps Median installs: 850 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 603 major competitor apps |
| built | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 27,167 competing apps Median installs: 800 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 99 major competitor apps |
| rate | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 20,106 competing apps Median installs: 900 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 153 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 53 | 87 150,250 competing apps Median installs: 850 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 834 major competitor apps |
| group | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 23,469 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 108 major competitor apps |
| test | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 38,610 competing apps Median installs: 1,050 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 311 major competitor apps |
| test results | 69 | 100 | 29 | 48 704 competing apps Median installs: 800 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4 major competitor apps |
| quality | 68 | 100 | 49 | 79 53,208 competing apps Median installs: 931 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 289 major competitor apps |
| easily | 67 | 100 | 51 | 83 85,676 competing apps Median installs: 800 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 450 major competitor apps |
| develop | 72 | 100 | 42 | 70 14,694 competing apps Median installs: 900 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 86 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 50 | 82 80,365 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 301 major competitor apps |
| producer | 69 | 100 | 27 | 45 522 competing apps Median installs: 950 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 0 major competitor apps |
| guide | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 30,981 competing apps Median installs: 800 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 108 major competitor apps |
| user | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 66,932 competing apps Median installs: 900 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 369 major competitor apps |
| enter | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 24,021 competing apps Median installs: 828 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 166 major competitor apps |
| required | 71 | 100 | 43 | 72 18,792 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 118 major competitor apps |
| weight | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,243 competing apps Median installs: 950 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 60 major competitor apps |
| two | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 31,491 competing apps Median installs: 900 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 177 major competitor apps |
| requirement | 70 | 100 | 30 | 50 1,007 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 4 major competitor apps |
| different | 67 | 100 | 51 | 83 95,103 competing apps Median installs: 1,026 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 660 major competitor apps |
| developing | 72 | 100 | 37 | 61 4,338 competing apps Median installs: 900 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 27 major competitor apps |
| select | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 48,315 competing apps Median installs: 800 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 274 major competitor apps |
App Description
The calculator incorporates NSW DPI growth calculations enabling the user to compare the cost of one or two feeds on an energy and protein basis, as well as develop a feed 'mix' using these feeds. The user can select from a range of feeds and use the estimated average feed quality values or enter their own values from a feed test.
The app calculates:
1. The pasture DMI (kg/hd/day)
2. Percent of energy requirement from pasture
3. Estimated weight gain from pasture (kg/day)
4. Amount of supplementary feed required (kg/hd/day)
5. Total supplement cost
Farmers can easily assess the value of different feeds by simply comparing these results for two feeds as well as a mixed ration. There are 71 different feeds to select from, each with their own estimated average energy, protein and dry matter values. Values can be easily overwritten when feed test results are available. There are a number of warnings built in to help guide the busy producer when developing a ration.