AAE EndoCase
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 96 keywords for AAE EndoCase in Apple App Store
AAE EndoCase tracks 96 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 95 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 49.4, difficulty 40.2, best rank 41.
Tracked keywords
96
1 ranked • 95 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 41 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
49.4
Top keyword: best
Avg difficulty
40.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 85.9
best
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,398
- 83.9
experience
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,134
- 83.5
choose
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,081
- 86.3
find
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,481
- 85.2
help
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 61.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,236
Unranked opportunities
best
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Competitors: 1,398
experience
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.1 • Competitors: 1,134
choose
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.7 • Competitors: 1,081
find
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.8 • Competitors: 1,481
help
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 61.1 • Competitors: 1,236
High competition keywords
find
Total apps: 6,521 • Major competitors: 1,481
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.8
best
Total apps: 6,283 • Major competitors: 1,398
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.6
help
Total apps: 5,873 • Major competitors: 1,236
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.1
experience
Total apps: 5,154 • Major competitors: 1,134
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.1
choose
Total apps: 4,918 • Major competitors: 1,081
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| difficulty | 58 | 100 | 41 | 62 550 competing apps Median installs: 248,100 Avg rating: 4.7 | 41 | 41 | 121 major competitor apps |
| best | 59 | 100 | 60 | 86 6,283 competing apps Median installs: 272,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,398 major competitor apps |
| board | 58 | 100 | 44 | 65 720 competing apps Median installs: 275,762 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 166 major competitor apps |
| level | 58 | 100 | 54 | 78 2,734 competing apps Median installs: 274,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 638 major competitor apps |
| whether | 58 | 100 | 59 | 79 3,139 competing apps Median installs: 267,650 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 715 major competitor apps |
| tailored | 58 | 100 | 53 | 66 836 competing apps Median installs: 291,662 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 179 major competitor apps |
| experience | 59 | 100 | 59 | 84 5,154 competing apps Median installs: 261,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,134 major competitor apps |
| within | 58 | 100 | 56 | 81 3,722 competing apps Median installs: 259,688 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 740 major competitor apps |
| treated | 56 | 100 | 21 | 30 21 competing apps Median installs: 275,875 Avg rating: 4.8 | — | — | 3 major competitor apps |
| choose | 59 | 100 | 61 | 83 4,918 competing apps Median installs: 263,588 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,081 major competitor apps |
| find | 59 | 100 | 64 | 86 6,521 competing apps Median installs: 264,850 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,481 major competitor apps |
| help | 59 | 100 | 61 | 85 5,873 competing apps Median installs: 257,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,236 major competitor apps |
| score | 20 | 100 | 52 | 68 977 competing apps Median installs: 314,100 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 264 major competitor apps |
| photos | 58 | 100 | 54 | 75 1,969 competing apps Median installs: 250,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 406 major competitor apps |
| ideal | 58 | 100 | 42 | 62 567 competing apps Median installs: 214,500 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 100 major competitor apps |
| take | 59 | 100 | 60 | 83 4,876 competing apps Median installs: 260,038 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,068 major competitor apps |
| appointment | 20 | 100 | 43 | 48 126 competing apps Median installs: 297,638 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 35 major competitor apps |
| student | 57 | 100 | 35 | 50 160 competing apps Median installs: 249,638 Avg rating: 4.5 | — | — | 28 major competitor apps |
| students | 57 | 100 | 38 | 54 253 competing apps Median installs: 213,650 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 38 major competitor apps |
| quickly | 58 | 100 | 56 | 75 1,969 competing apps Median installs: 280,350 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 484 major competitor apps |
| patient | 57 | 100 | 30 | 45 94 competing apps Median installs: 207,600 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 14 major competitor apps |
| provider | 57 | 100 | 50 | 56 313 competing apps Median installs: 231,175 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 60 major competitor apps |
| suitable | 58 | 100 | 41 | 61 522 competing apps Median installs: 225,925 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 83 major competitor apps |
| upon | 58 | 100 | 41 | 62 570 competing apps Median installs: 215,925 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 98 major competitor apps |
| case | 57 | 100 | 40 | 55 281 competing apps Median installs: 250,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 62 major competitor apps |
App Description
If the user finds the case beyond their ability, they may choose to refer the case. An automatic referral letter can be generated and printed with the details of the referral. The user can choose to take photos with their phone. This is useful if photos of radiographs or clinical appearances are desired.
• The patient will be able to understand that their case is difficult and that an endodontist would be the ideal provider of care.
• The endodontist can consider an appropriately timed appointment based upon the difficulty.
LEVELS OF DIFFICULTY
Like our Case Difficulty Assessment Form, the app distinguishes between Minimal, Moderate and High Difficulty.
Review your assessment of each case to determine the level of difficulty. If the level of difficulty exceeds your experience and comfort, you might consider referral to an endodontist.
Scores
Those items listed in the Minimal Difficulty category are assigned a point value of 1.
Those items listed in the Moderate Difficulty category are assigned a point value of 2.
Those items listed in the High Difficulty category are assigned a point value of 5.
The following score ranges are recommended in making the decision whether to treat or refer:
• Less than 21 points: Dental student may treat—level of faculty supervision should be tailored to the student’s level of experience.
• 21 – 40 points: An experienced and skilled dental student may treat with very close supervision by an endodontist, or the case referred to a graduate student or endodontist.
• Above 40 points: The case should not be treated by a predoctoral dental student. The patient should be referred to a graduate student or endodontist.
The assignment of an objective “point score” will hopefully assist the dental student in critically evaluating the difficulty associated with treating each patient, assist him/her in making a treatment decision that will be in the patient’s best interests, as wel