Kt-V Calc

Developer: Henry Ford Health

Category: Medical

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 25 keywords for Kt-V Calc in Apple App Store

Developer: Henry Ford Health System Category: medical

Kt-V Calc tracks 25 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 25 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 50.6, difficulty 38.9.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 25 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

50.6

Top keyword: time

Avg difficulty

38.9

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

time

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,805
88.7
change

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 400
73.9
using

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 61.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 924
82.6
important

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 248
70.0
transfer

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 170
67.3

Unranked opportunities

time

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Competitors: 1,805
change

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.7 • Competitors: 400
using

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 61.4 • Competitors: 924
important

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.6 • Competitors: 248
transfer

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.5 • Competitors: 170

High competition keywords

time

Total apps: 8,391 • Major competitors: 1,805

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.9
using

Total apps: 4,473 • Major competitors: 924

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.4
automatically

Total apps: 4,092 • Major competitors: 815

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.8
change

Total apps: 1,855 • Major competitors: 400

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7
popular

Total apps: 1,696 • Major competitors: 386

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
change	58	100	54	74 1,855 competing apps Median installs: 267,450 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	400 major competitor apps
choosing	57	100	38	56 306 competing apps Median installs: 252,550 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	60 major competitor apps
using	58	100	61	83 4,473 competing apps Median installs: 247,200 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	924 major competitor apps
time	59	100	63	89 8,391 competing apps Median installs: 259,600 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	1,805 major competitor apps
volume	57	100	42	55 259 competing apps Median installs: 186,100 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	45 major competitor apps
efficiency	57	100	30	46 102 competing apps Median installs: 229,538 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	12 major competitor apps
patient	57	100	30	45 94 competing apps Median installs: 207,600 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	14 major competitor apps
flow	57	100	37	53 230 competing apps Median installs: 235,462 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	37 major competitor apps
important	58	100	52	70 1,244 competing apps Median installs: 231,362 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	248 major competitor apps
transfer	58	100	52	67 942 competing apps Median installs: 222,612 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	170 major competitor apps
water	58	100	42	61 507 competing apps Median installs: 231,125 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	95 major competitor apps
pool	57	100	37	48 135 competing apps Median installs: 256,450 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	32 major competitor apps
calculates	57	100	28	40 60 competing apps Median installs: 214,475 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	13 major competitor apps
automatically	58	100	57	82 4,092 competing apps Median installs: 257,862 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	815 major competitor apps
instantly	58	100	54	70 1,233 competing apps Median installs: 262,475 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	261 major competitor apps
blood	57	100	36	53 218 competing apps Median installs: 188,275 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	37 major competitor apps
popular	58	100	55	73 1,696 competing apps Median installs: 272,225 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	386 major competitor apps
selection	58	100	52	65 772 competing apps Median installs: 261,050 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	163 major competitor apps
treatment	57	100	32	48 131 competing apps Median installs: 188,575 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	26 major competitor apps
expected	57	100	35	37 44 competing apps Median installs: 339,212 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	10 major competitor apps
prescribing	0	56	13	20 7 competing apps Median installs: 173,275 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	0 major competitor apps
parameter	56	90	16	25 12 competing apps Median installs: 136,262 Avg rating: 4.5	—	—	1 major competitor apps
mass	57	100	28	43 81 competing apps Median installs: 220,850 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	12 major competitor apps
compute	0	63	14	22 8 competing apps Median installs: 125,750 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	0 major competitor apps
automatically calculates	0	49	13	19 6 competing apps Median installs: 248,325 Avg rating: 4.8	—	—	1 major competitor apps

App Description

Automatically calculates hemodialysis efficiency (K*t/V) using single-pool kinetics and mass transfer coefficients of a selection of popular dialyzers. Choosing a dialyzer instantly calculates this important parameter for nephrologists prescribing dialysis. One can change the blood flow dialysate flow, treatment time and water volume of the patient to compute the expected dialysis efficiency.