FAMEWS

Developer: David Hughes

Category: Education

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 86 keywords for FAMEWS in Apple App Store

Developer: David Hughes Category: education

FAMEWS tracks 86 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 86 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 48.4, difficulty 39.6.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 86 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

48.4

Top keyword: free

Avg difficulty

39.6

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

free

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 2,147
89.9
best

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,398
85.9
time

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,805
88.7
changes

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 138
62.0
used

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 279
71.8

Unranked opportunities

free

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.5 • Competitors: 2,147
best

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Competitors: 1,398
time

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Competitors: 1,805
changes

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Competitors: 138
used

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.9 • Competitors: 279

High competition keywords

free

Total apps: 9,480 • Major competitors: 2,147

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.5
time

Total apps: 8,391 • Major competitors: 1,805

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.9
best

Total apps: 6,283 • Major competitors: 1,398

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.6
mobile

Total apps: 3,947 • Major competitors: 846

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.2
current

Total apps: 3,863 • Major competitors: 756

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.3

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
free	59	100	63	90 9,480 competing apps Median installs: 264,750 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	2,147 major competitor apps
best	59	100	60	86 6,283 competing apps Median installs: 272,625 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	1,398 major competitor apps
changes	58	100	49	62 553 competing apps Median installs: 258,975 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	138 major competitor apps
organization	57	100	40	49 152 competing apps Median installs: 255,750 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	31 major competitor apps
used	58	100	53	72 1,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,800 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	279 major competitor apps
designed	58	100	54	80 3,407 competing apps Median installs: 230,000 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	624 major competitor apps
management	58	100	46	66 856 competing apps Median installs: 221,550 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	138 major competitor apps
needs	58	100	47	67 920 competing apps Median installs: 251,312 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	194 major competitor apps
valuable	58	100	41	59 426 competing apps Median installs: 221,338 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	71 major competitor apps
food	58	100	52	68 985 competing apps Median installs: 270,500 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	226 major competitor apps
time	59	100	63	89 8,391 competing apps Median installs: 259,600 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	1,805 major competitor apps
mobile	58	100	60	81 3,947 competing apps Median installs: 251,675 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	846 major competitor apps
collected	57	100	37	49 146 competing apps Median installs: 197,275 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	28 major competitor apps
monitor	58	100	49	66 847 competing apps Median installs: 244,700 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	175 major competitor apps
quickly	58	100	56	75 1,969 competing apps Median installs: 280,350 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	484 major competitor apps
others	58	100	47	64 698 competing apps Median installs: 281,575 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	158 major competitor apps
provides	58	100	49	74 1,846 competing apps Median installs: 221,075 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	308 major competitor apps
stage	57	100	37	54 246 competing apps Median installs: 239,225 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	52 major competitor apps
tool	58	100	47	69 1,134 competing apps Median installs: 210,275 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	170 major competitor apps
improve	58	100	50	74 1,897 competing apps Median installs: 240,375 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	379 major competitor apps
current	58	100	56	81 3,863 competing apps Median installs: 255,000 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	756 major competitor apps
allows	58	100	50	75 2,119 competing apps Median installs: 225,625 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	351 major competitor apps
knowledge	58	100	42	61 508 competing apps Median installs: 225,512 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	84 major competitor apps
crops	57	100	34	43 77 competing apps Median installs: 218,550 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	12 major competitor apps
check	58	100	60	78 2,949 competing apps Median installs: 263,650 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	689 major competitor apps

App Description

The FAW Monitoring and Early Warning System (FAMEWS) is a free mobile application from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) for the real-time global monitoring of the Fall Armyworm (FAW). This multi-lingual tool allows farmers, communities, extension agents and others to record standardized field data whenever they scout a field or check pheromone traps for FAW. Data from the app provides valuable insights on how FAW changes over time with ecology, to improve knowledge of its behaviour and guide best management practices. All collected data are used by FAO, countries and partners to map and monitor current infestations. The app is designed to expand with the evolving needs of farmers, analysts and decision-makers, and can be used anywhere in the world.

Fall Armyworm (FAW) (Spodoptera frugiperda), is an insect pest of more than 80 plant species. The larval stage of the insect causes damage to economically important cultivated cereals such as maize, rice, sorghum, and also to vegetable crops and cotton. The pest is native to tropical and subtropical regions of the Americas. It was first detected in Central and Western Africa in early 2016 and has quickly spread across virtually all of sub-Saharan Africa. Because of trade and the moth's strong flying ability, it has the potential to spread further. Maize is the most infested crop in Africa.