SLED Ca/Mg Calc

Developer: Henry Ford Health

Category: Medical

~50 - 100

1 ratings

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 25 keywords for SLED Ca/Mg Calc in Apple App Store

Developer: Henry Ford Health System Category: medical Rating: 5

SLED Ca/Mg Calc tracks 25 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 25 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 40.5, difficulty 33.6.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 25 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

40.5

Top keyword: used

Avg difficulty

33.6

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

used

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 279
71.8
rate

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 144
64.7
required

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 50.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 143
63.9
low

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 44.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 104
61.4
reduce

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 72
59.4

Unranked opportunities

used

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.9 • Competitors: 279
rate

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Competitors: 144
required

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 50.9 • Competitors: 143
low

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 44.3 • Competitors: 104
reduce

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Competitors: 72

High competition keywords

may

Total apps: 3,755 • Major competitors: 871

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.6
used

Total apps: 1,494 • Major competitors: 279

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.9
rate

Total apps: 724 • Major competitors: 144

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 46.7
required

Total apps: 665 • Major competitors: 143

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.9
low

Total apps: 519 • Major competitors: 104

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 44.3

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
used	58	100	53	72 1,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,800 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	279 major competitor apps
rate	58	100	47	65 724 competing apps Median installs: 244,638 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	144 major competitor apps
efficiency	57	100	30	46 102 competing apps Median installs: 229,538 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	12 major competitor apps
patients	57	100	30	45 99 competing apps Median installs: 221,425 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	21 major competitor apps
continuous	57	100	37	52 201 competing apps Median installs: 213,550 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	32 major competitor apps
hour	20	100	43	57 315 competing apps Median installs: 372,675 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	81 major competitor apps
required	58	100	51	64 665 competing apps Median installs: 263,050 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	143 major competitor apps
low	58	100	44	61 519 competing apps Median installs: 276,075 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	104 major competitor apps
reduce	58	100	46	59 421 competing apps Median installs: 239,800 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	72 major competitor apps
increasingly	57	100	35	49 150 competing apps Median installs: 283,975 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	31 major competitor apps
resource	57	100	35	51 188 competing apps Median installs: 208,212 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	38 major competitor apps
may	58	100	62	81 3,755 competing apps Median installs: 275,100 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	871 major competitor apps
expense	57	100	34	45 97 competing apps Median installs: 301,900 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	18 major competitor apps
conjunction	56	100	22	31 23 competing apps Median installs: 282,950 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	3 major competitor apps
acute	0	41	12	18 5 competing apps Median installs: 264,200 Avg rating: 4.8	—	—	0 major competitor apps
replacement	20	100	49	39 51 competing apps Median installs: 360,400 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	13 major competitor apps
adequate	0	49	18	19 6 competing apps Median installs: 248,688 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	2 major competitor apps
prevent	57	100	43	56 291 competing apps Median installs: 254,325 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	57 major competitor apps
injury	57	100	28	38 45 competing apps Median installs: 211,450 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	9 major competitor apps
sustained	0	49	21	19 6 competing apps Median installs: 490,400 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	2 major competitor apps
intermittent	57	100	35	38 48 competing apps Median installs: 249,225 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	12 major competitor apps
critically	56	100	29	35 35 competing apps Median installs: 267,025 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	8 major competitor apps
ill	0	34	10	16 4 competing apps Median installs: 177,338 Avg rating: 4.8	—	—	0 major competitor apps
kidney	0	70	16	23 9 competing apps Median installs: 167,225 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	1 major competitor apps
therapies	0	18	8	11 2 competing apps Median installs: 472,950 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	0 major competitor apps

App Description

Sustained low efficiency dialysis (SLED) is increasingly used as a renal replacement modality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) and hemodynamic instability. SLED may reduce the hemodynamic perturbations of intermittent hemodialysis, while obviating the resource demands/expense of continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT). This app is used in conjunction with citrate anticoagulation and computes the ultrafiltration rate and calcium and magnesium concentrations required for adequate anticoagulation to prevent clotting of the dialyzer over a 24 hour period.