SLED Ca/Mg Calc

Developer: Henry Ford Health

Category: Medical

Add App to Comparison

50 installs

1.00 ratings

4.00 monthly active users

Revenue not available

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 25 keywords for SLED Ca/Mg Calc in Apple App Store

Developer: Henry Ford Health System Category: medical Rating: 5

SLED Ca/Mg Calc tracks 25 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 25 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.8, difficulty 36.1.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 25 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.8

Top keyword: efficiency

Avg difficulty

36.1

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

efficiency

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 59
64.7
patients

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 37.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 43
62.0
continuous

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 141
65.3
hour

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 210
63.9
low

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 359
68.5

Unranked opportunities

efficiency

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Competitors: 59
patients

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 37.5 • Competitors: 43
continuous

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 141
hour

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 210
low

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.2 • Competitors: 359

High competition keywords

may

Total apps: 51,558 • Major competitors: 1,883

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.7
used

Total apps: 50,340 • Major competitors: 738

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.4
rate

Total apps: 21,574 • Major competitors: 456

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 45.2
required

Total apps: 18,628 • Major competitors: 323

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 44.1
low

Total apps: 13,190 • Major competitors: 359

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 43.2

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
used	69	100	48	78 50,340 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	738 major competitor apps
rate	71	100	45	72 21,574 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	456 major competitor apps
efficiency	73	100	39	65 7,755 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	59 major competitor apps
patients	73	100	37	62 5,396 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	43 major competitor apps
continuous	73	100	41	65 8,485 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	141 major competitor apps
hour	73	100	40	64 6,987 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	210 major competitor apps
required	72	100	44	71 18,628 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	323 major competitor apps
low	73	100	43	69 13,190 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	359 major competitor apps
reduce	73	100	42	68 12,021 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	210 major competitor apps
increasingly	72	100	36	57 2,793 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	90 major competitor apps
resource	73	100	40	66 8,759 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	89 major competitor apps
may	69	100	52	78 51,558 competing apps Median installs: 800 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,883 major competitor apps
expense	72	100	38	61 4,697 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	60 major competitor apps
conjunction	71	100	34	55 2,071 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 3.8	—	—	10 major competitor apps
acute	69	100	28	46 592 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	2 major competitor apps
replacement	71	100	35	55 1,933 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	36 major competitor apps
adequate	69	100	26	42 358 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	4 major competitor apps
prevent	73	100	39	63 5,970 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	158 major competitor apps
injury	71	100	32	52 1,392 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	21 major competitor apps
sustained	68	100	26	41 299 competing apps Median installs: 325 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	4 major competitor apps
intermittent	69	100	32	46 622 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.5	—	—	28 major competitor apps
critically	69	100	28	44 416 competing apps Median installs: 1,300 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	20 major competitor apps
ill	69	100	26	43 406 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	2 major competitor apps
kidney	68	100	25	41 292 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	5 major competitor apps
therapies	68	100	24	40 262 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	2 major competitor apps

App Description

Sustained low efficiency dialysis (SLED) is increasingly used as a renal replacement modality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) and hemodynamic instability. SLED may reduce the hemodynamic perturbations of intermittent hemodialysis, while obviating the resource demands/expense of continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT). This app is used in conjunction with citrate anticoagulation and computes the ultrafiltration rate and calcium and magnesium concentrations required for adequate anticoagulation to prevent clotting of the dialyzer over a 24 hour period.