SLED Ca/Mg Calc

Developer: Henry Ford Health

Category: Medical

Add App to Comparison

~50 - 100

1.00 ratings

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 25 keywords for SLED Ca/Mg Calc in Apple App Store

Developer: Henry Ford Health System Category: medical Rating: 5

SLED Ca/Mg Calc tracks 25 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 25 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.5, difficulty 35.0.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 25 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.5

Top keyword: efficiency

Avg difficulty

35.0

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

efficiency

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 18
63.9
continuous

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 44
64.8
hour

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 92
63.8
low

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 141
68.1
reduce

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 82
68.4

Unranked opportunities

efficiency

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Competitors: 18
continuous

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Competitors: 44
hour

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.8 • Competitors: 92
low

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 141
reduce

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Competitors: 82

High competition keywords

may

Total apps: 52,216 • Major competitors: 891

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.4
used

Total apps: 50,800 • Major competitors: 303

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 47.6
rate

Total apps: 20,021 • Major competitors: 178

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 43.6
required

Total apps: 18,878 • Major competitors: 146

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 43.2
reduce

Total apps: 12,200 • Major competitors: 82

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 41.5

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
used	68	100	48	79 50,800 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	303 major competitor apps
rate	71	100	44	72 20,021 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	178 major competitor apps
efficiency	73	100	38	64 6,573 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	18 major competitor apps
patients	72	100	38	63 5,423 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	21 major competitor apps
continuous	73	100	39	65 7,471 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	44 major competitor apps
hour	73	100	39	64 6,473 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	92 major competitor apps
required	71	100	43	72 18,878 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	146 major competitor apps
low	73	100	41	68 11,709 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	141 major competitor apps
reduce	73	100	41	68 12,200 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	82 major competitor apps
increasingly	71	100	35	58 2,816 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	39 major competitor apps
resource	73	100	39	65 7,923 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	44 major competitor apps
may	68	100	48	79 52,216 competing apps Median installs: 225 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	891 major competitor apps
expense	72	100	36	60 3,977 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	20 major competitor apps
conjunction	71	100	33	55 1,946 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 3.8	—	—	4 major competitor apps
acute	69	100	28	46 559 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	1 major competitor apps
replacement	71	100	33	54 1,738 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	19 major competitor apps
adequate	68	100	26	42 334 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	2 major competitor apps
prevent	72	100	38	63 6,044 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	68 major competitor apps
injury	70	100	31	52 1,257 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	9 major competitor apps
sustained	68	100	25	42 302 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	2 major competitor apps
intermittent	69	100	29	46 557 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.5	—	—	16 major competitor apps
critically	69	100	28	46 526 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	6 major competitor apps
ill	68	100	25	42 319 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.4	—	—	0 major competitor apps
kidney	68	100	25	41 268 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	2 major competitor apps
therapies	68	100	24	41 264 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	0 major competitor apps

App Description

Sustained low efficiency dialysis (SLED) is increasingly used as a renal replacement modality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) and hemodynamic instability. SLED may reduce the hemodynamic perturbations of intermittent hemodialysis, while obviating the resource demands/expense of continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT). This app is used in conjunction with citrate anticoagulation and computes the ultrafiltration rate and calcium and magnesium concentrations required for adequate anticoagulation to prevent clotting of the dialyzer over a 24 hour period.