ThePeriodic
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 49 keywords for ThePeriodic in Apple App Store
ThePeriodic tracks 49 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 48 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.6, difficulty 37.6, best rank 72.
Tracked keywords
49
1 ranked • 48 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 72 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.6
Top keyword: nature
Avg difficulty
37.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.6
nature
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 84
- 67.8
calculate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 87
- 68.3
energy
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 169
- 63.4
universal
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 64
- 65.3
model
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 108
Unranked opportunities
nature
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 84
calculate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 87
energy
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Competitors: 169
universal
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Competitors: 64
model
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Competitors: 108
High competition keywords
like
Total apps: 143,203 • Major competitors: 3,240
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.6
different
Total apps: 95,103 • Major competitors: 1,687
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.5
today
Total apps: 50,043 • Major competitors: 594
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.1
number
Total apps: 44,765 • Major competitors: 705
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.0
important
Total apps: 44,405 • Major competitors: 512
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| periodic | 70 | 100 | 31 | 51 1,043 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | 72 | 72 | 10 major competitor apps |
| version | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 29,567 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 378 major competitor apps |
| error | 71 | 100 | 34 | 55 2,029 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 23 major competitor apps |
| today | 69 | 100 | 49 | 79 50,043 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 594 major competitor apps |
| like | 65 | 100 | 56 | 86 143,203 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,240 major competitor apps |
| output | 72 | 100 | 37 | 60 3,797 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 27 major competitor apps |
| structure | 72 | 100 | 37 | 61 4,478 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 24 major competitor apps |
| nature | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 6,302 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 84 major competitor apps |
| calculate | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 11,191 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 87 major competitor apps |
| different | 67 | 100 | 53 | 83 95,103 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,687 major competitor apps |
| important | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 44,405 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 512 major competitor apps |
| energy | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 12,118 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 169 major competitor apps |
| look | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 37,408 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 758 major competitor apps |
| normal | 72 | 100 | 39 | 61 4,726 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 63 major competitor apps |
| matter | 72 | 100 | 46 | 71 17,665 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 393 major competitor apps |
| universal | 73 | 100 | 39 | 63 6,106 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 64 major competitor apps |
| model | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 8,019 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 108 major competitor apps |
| number | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 44,765 competing apps Median installs: 483 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 705 major competitor apps |
| verified | 72 | 100 | 44 | 62 4,812 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 101 major competitor apps |
| bond | 71 | 100 | 39 | 54 1,783 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 33 major competitor apps |
| element | 71 | 100 | 34 | 56 2,111 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 31 major competitor apps |
| iron | 70 | 100 | 32 | 51 1,051 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 28 major competitor apps |
| non | 71 | 100 | 38 | 58 2,930 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 56 major competitor apps |
| wrong | 72 | 100 | 39 | 63 5,450 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 73 major competitor apps |
| definition | 72 | 100 | 37 | 60 3,630 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 55 major competitor apps |
App Description
Most Periodic Tables published today as it pertains to Electronic Orbital Configuration are in error.
This version of THEPERIODIC adds:
1) The equally elegant Valance Orbital Equation (VOEs) that use the output of the UQEs to calculate the number "normal energy" bonding electrons element will use in reactions with other elements or molecules.
2) The Config Explorer enables examination of elements that have similar outer electronic configuration or valence electron count.
3) The UQEs and VOEs are now neatly implemented in a new Combine enabled framework call ElementalFramework that can models the asynchronous, non-sequential, parallel bonding behavior of biological/chemical reactions.
4) Numerous discrepancies (Periodic Table errors) have been exposed by the mathematical computation from the UQEs. One very important error is with iron (Fe). In most chemistry textbooks is shows Fe with a valence of 2 or 3. The VOEs calculates that Fe "normal energy" bonding electrons are 4! This exactly matches what is seen in the energy powerhouse hemoglobin used by animals.
Also the published structure of Fe2O3 is wrong in most textbooks the textbooks and should look like a 3D polygon
O1
/ . \
Fe 1. - Fe2
\ /
(bond to Fe1) \ O2 . / (bond to Fe2)
\ . /
\ /
O3
is but just one example. UQEs states the valence of Fe is 4 (and verified by nature's Hemoglobin molecule. It is not 2, or 3 as most texts suggests.
The larger elements are more apt to use other unfilled orbital shells to "achieve closer nobility" by capturing smaller element electrons (along with the other element and thus the definition of bond). THEPERIODIC's (VOEs) is