Stoichiometry Gas Phase
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 63 keywords for Stoichiometry Gas Phase in Apple App Store
Stoichiometry Gas Phase tracks 63 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 63 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.3, difficulty 39.2.
Tracked keywords
63
0 ranked • 63 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.3
Top keyword: external
Avg difficulty
39.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.5
external
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 94
- 64.1
volume
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 84
- 67.9
second
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 167
- 68.0
calculate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 89
- 63.4
pressure
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 105
Unranked opportunities
external
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Competitors: 94
volume
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Competitors: 84
second
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 167
calculate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 89
pressure
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 105
High competition keywords
data
Total apps: 97,696 • Major competitors: 1,021
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
available
Total apps: 95,747 • Major competitors: 1,852
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.5
based
Total apps: 79,282 • Major competitors: 1,049
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.8
user
Total apps: 77,199 • Major competitors: 980
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.3
provides
Total apps: 72,500 • Major competitors: 565
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.2
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| external | 73 | 100 | 41 | 65 7,623 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 94 major competitor apps |
| include | 71 | 100 | 44 | 71 19,409 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 237 major competitor apps |
| available | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 95,747 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,852 major competitor apps |
| provide | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 55,811 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 558 major competitor apps |
| volume | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 7,136 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 84 major competitor apps |
| visit | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 31,633 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 694 major competitor apps |
| directly | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 51,983 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 710 major competitor apps |
| products | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 24,665 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 403 major competitor apps |
| provides | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 72,500 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 565 major competitor apps |
| tool | 69 | 100 | 48 | 79 53,498 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 383 major competitor apps |
| second | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 12,199 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 167 major competitor apps |
| please | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 56,148 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 975 major competitor apps |
| user | 67 | 100 | 50 | 81 77,199 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 980 major competitor apps |
| calculate | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 12,281 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 89 major competitor apps |
| required | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 18,702 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 235 major competitor apps |
| pressure | 73 | 100 | 39 | 63 6,480 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 105 major competitor apps |
| two | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 31,389 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 436 major competitor apps |
| provided | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 19,031 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 177 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 52 | 83 97,696 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,021 major competitor apps |
| background | 70 | 100 | 47 | 74 27,560 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 450 major competitor apps |
| constant | 72 | 100 | 40 | 60 4,121 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 58 major competitor apps |
| reaction | 71 | 100 | 36 | 57 2,501 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 42 major competitor apps |
| calculated | 72 | 100 | 35 | 57 2,722 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 25 major competitor apps |
| preference | 70 | 100 | 33 | 52 1,294 competing apps Median installs: 475 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 18 major competitor apps |
| final | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 8,275 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 102 major competitor apps |
App Description
Application provides two layouts: the first is for reactions occurring at the user defined constant volume, where moles and partial pressures of compounds are calculated and the second is for reactions occurring at the user defined constant external pressure, where moles and volumes of gaseous compounds are analysed.
User is required to provide initial or final (after reaction accomplishment) pressures (volumes) or moles of any of the reaction component, to calculate all required and obtained pressures (volumes) and moles for all components. If data is available for several components, then limiting reagent will be found based on reaction stoichiometry. Either mole or pressure (volume) should be filled in for each compound, but if both are provided and they do not match, then moles value will have a preference and the stoichiometrically matching pressure (volume) will be recalculated.
The app can get data directly from Stoichiometry application for calculations of pressures/volumes of gaseous compounds. The data may include balanced chemical reaction, molar weights and initial mole quantities.
For further details and theoretical background please visit www.volard.wordpress.com