Stoichiometry Gas Phase
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 63 keywords for Stoichiometry Gas Phase in Apple App Store
Stoichiometry Gas Phase tracks 63 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 63 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 46.6, difficulty 37.6.
Tracked keywords
63
0 ranked • 63 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
46.6
Top keyword: include
Avg difficulty
37.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.3
include
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 152
- 81.6
available
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 64.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 979
- 72.9
provide
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 293
- 72.5
visit
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 377
- 74.5
directly
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 58.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 424
Unranked opportunities
include
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Competitors: 152
available
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 64.5 • Competitors: 979
provide
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.4 • Competitors: 293
visit
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.4 • Competitors: 377
directly
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 58.3 • Competitors: 424
High competition keywords
available
Total apps: 4,074 • Major competitors: 979
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.5
may
Total apps: 3,755 • Major competitors: 871
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.6
based
Total apps: 3,039 • Major competitors: 697
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7
please
Total apps: 2,739 • Major competitors: 552
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.4
ultimate
Total apps: 2,716 • Major competitors: 601
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| external | 57 | 100 | 40 | 55 257 competing apps Median installs: 213,300 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 39 major competitor apps |
| include | 58 | 100 | 45 | 64 693 competing apps Median installs: 243,825 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 152 major competitor apps |
| available | 58 | 100 | 64 | 82 4,074 competing apps Median installs: 282,412 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 979 major competitor apps |
| provide | 58 | 100 | 49 | 73 1,667 competing apps Median installs: 243,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 293 major competitor apps |
| volume | 57 | 100 | 42 | 55 259 competing apps Median installs: 186,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 45 major competitor apps |
| visit | 58 | 100 | 51 | 73 1,608 competing apps Median installs: 279,325 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 377 major competitor apps |
| directly | 58 | 100 | 58 | 74 1,959 competing apps Median installs: 280,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 424 major competitor apps |
| products | 20 | 100 | 58 | 67 928 competing apps Median installs: 325,375 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 263 major competitor apps |
| provides | 58 | 100 | 49 | 74 1,846 competing apps Median installs: 221,075 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 308 major competitor apps |
| tool | 58 | 100 | 47 | 69 1,134 competing apps Median installs: 210,275 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 170 major competitor apps |
| second | 57 | 100 | 43 | 58 382 competing apps Median installs: 261,788 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 78 major competitor apps |
| please | 58 | 100 | 53 | 78 2,739 competing apps Median installs: 250,125 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 552 major competitor apps |
| user | 58 | 100 | 52 | 77 2,498 competing apps Median installs: 242,250 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 453 major competitor apps |
| calculate | 57 | 100 | 39 | 52 203 competing apps Median installs: 194,625 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 41 major competitor apps |
| required | 58 | 100 | 51 | 64 665 competing apps Median installs: 263,050 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 143 major competitor apps |
| pressure | 57 | 100 | 38 | 54 253 competing apps Median installs: 218,975 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 56 major competitor apps |
| two | 58 | 100 | 49 | 70 1,253 competing apps Median installs: 238,750 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 249 major competitor apps |
| provided | 58 | 100 | 45 | 61 515 competing apps Median installs: 271,325 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 109 major competitor apps |
| data | 58 | 100 | 55 | 77 2,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,338 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 472 major competitor apps |
| background | 58 | 100 | 47 | 69 1,091 competing apps Median installs: 252,750 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 197 major competitor apps |
| constant | 57 | 100 | 40 | 49 145 competing apps Median installs: 259,175 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 29 major competitor apps |
| reaction | 57 | 100 | 33 | 44 86 competing apps Median installs: 238,788 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 20 major competitor apps |
| calculated | 57 | 100 | 32 | 42 71 competing apps Median installs: 239,800 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 11 major competitor apps |
| preference | 20 | 100 | 35 | 35 36 competing apps Median installs: 447,325 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 11 major competitor apps |
| final | 57 | 100 | 38 | 55 274 competing apps Median installs: 241,688 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 50 major competitor apps |
App Description
Application provides two layouts: the first is for reactions occurring at the user defined constant volume, where moles and partial pressures of compounds are calculated and the second is for reactions occurring at the user defined constant external pressure, where moles and volumes of gaseous compounds are analysed.
User is required to provide initial or final (after reaction accomplishment) pressures (volumes) or moles of any of the reaction component, to calculate all required and obtained pressures (volumes) and moles for all components. If data is available for several components, then limiting reagent will be found based on reaction stoichiometry. Either mole or pressure (volume) should be filled in for each compound, but if both are provided and they do not match, then moles value will have a preference and the stoichiometrically matching pressure (volume) will be recalculated.
The app can get data directly from Stoichiometry application for calculations of pressures/volumes of gaseous compounds. The data may include balanced chemical reaction, molar weights and initial mole quantities.
For further details and theoretical background please visit www.volard.wordpress.com