UNJSPF Digital CE

Developer: International Computing Centre

Category: Productivity

Add App to Comparison

540.9K installs

10.8K ratings

10.9K monthly active users

Revenue not available

Install Trends

Weekly +1.9K

Steady

Monthly +13.9K

Steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 52 keywords for UNJSPF Digital CE in Apple App Store

Developer: International Computing Centre Category: productivity Rating: 4.67

UNJSPF Digital CE tracks 52 keywords (10 keywords rank; 42 need traction). Key metrics: 10% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.4, difficulty 40.3, best rank 7.

Tracked keywords

10 ranked • 42 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

10%

Best rank 7 • Latest leader 147

Avg opportunity

70.4

Top keyword: internal

Avg difficulty

40.3

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

internal

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 37.9 • Rank 147

Competitors: 47
62.6
located

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 57
64.8
continue

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 289
67.8
submit

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 167
68.4
stored

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 140
67.8

Unranked opportunities

located

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Competitors: 57
continue

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Competitors: 289
submit

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Competitors: 167
stored

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Competitors: 140
slow

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.8 • Competitors: 166

High competition keywords

track

Total apps: 125,835 • Major competitors: 2,073

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.5
data

Total apps: 97,788 • Major competitors: 1,437

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
want

Total apps: 83,244 • Major competitors: 2,037

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.1
based

Total apps: 79,228 • Major competitors: 1,405

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.5
user

Total apps: 77,217 • Major competitors: 1,443

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.3

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
digital	69	100	49	78 52,292 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2	9	7	1,002 major competitor apps
digitally	71	100	33	53 1,534 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0	15	15	23 major competitor apps
ce	71	100	32	53 1,501 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0	23	23	8 major competitor apps
digit	72	100	36	57 2,726 competing apps Median installs: 3,700 Avg rating: 4.3	32	32	46 major competitor apps
biometric	72	100	36	58 2,987 competing apps Median installs: 1,250 Avg rating: 4.3	51	51	76 major competitor apps
numerical	70	100	31	50 1,044 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	82	82	9 major competitor apps
centre	72	100	35	57 2,865 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.0	110	110	22 major competitor apps
numerous	72	100	39	62 5,060 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1	133	122	151 major competitor apps
internal	73	100	38	63 5,794 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.0	147	145	47 major competitor apps
des	72	100	35	58 2,934 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0	244	244	9 major competitor apps
used	69	100	48	78 50,473 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	700 major competitor apps
secure	69	100	50	78 51,530 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	968 major competitor apps
option	72	100	45	71 19,022 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	465 major competitor apps
process	70	100	46	74 28,707 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	333 major competitor apps
services	69	100	49	77 42,307 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	736 major competitor apps
track	66	100	53	85 125,835 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	2,073 major competitor apps
located	73	100	40	65 7,907 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	57 major competitor apps
current	68	100	51	81 73,039 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	2,105 major competitor apps
want	67	100	51	82 83,244 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,037 major competitor apps
check	68	100	51	81 71,639 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,688 major competitor apps
location	69	100	48	76 39,884 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	641 major competitor apps
user	67	100	50	81 77,217 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,443 major competitor apps
continue	73	100	42	68 11,937 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	289 major competitor apps
possible	71	100	44	72 21,922 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	385 major competitor apps
data	67	100	51	83 97,788 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,437 major competitor apps

App Description

The current paper-based process for the UNJSPF Certificate of Entitlement to prove a retiree’s/beneficiary’s eligibility for continued pension caters to over 70 thousand retirees and beneficiaries located in more than 190 countries. As it uses postal services, the process is very slow and cumbersome.

The App uses facial biometric technology, liveness check and geo-location to submit a Digital Certificate of Entitlement to a secure blockchain. Use of location makes it possible for retirees and beneficiaries paid under the two-track to also use the app.

All user data is stored securely either in the App or in data centres protected by UN Privileges and Immunity. No cloud-based services are used for processing of user information.

The paper-based CE will continue to be an option for the retires/beneficiaries who cannot/ do not want to use the app.