Track and Field Scorebook
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 67 keywords for Track and Field Scorebook in Apple App Store
Track and Field Scorebook tracks 67 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 67 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.6, difficulty 39.6.
Tracked keywords
67
0 ranked • 67 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.6
Top keyword: wait
Avg difficulty
39.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.5
wait
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 104
- 67.3
needed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 60
- 67.7
places
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 67
- 65.7
simplify
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 53
- 67.9
press
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 71
Unranked opportunities
wait
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Competitors: 104
needed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 60
places
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 67
simplify
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Competitors: 53
press
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Competitors: 71
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 192,370 • Major competitors: 1,606
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
new
Total apps: 184,326 • Major competitors: 2,117
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.4
make
Total apps: 160,766 • Major competitors: 1,611
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.7
help
Total apps: 148,927 • Major competitors: 1,294
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
create
Total apps: 117,926 • Major competitors: 1,227
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new | 65 | 100 | 53 | 88 184,326 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,117 major competitor apps |
| offline | 69 | 100 | 46 | 76 36,586 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 323 major competitor apps |
| share | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 112,666 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 950 major competitor apps |
| make | 65 | 100 | 53 | 87 160,766 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,611 major competitor apps |
| events | 69 | 100 | 46 | 76 36,261 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 292 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 40,603 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 459 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 115,462 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 565 major competitor apps |
| list | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 40,378 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 259 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 116,012 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 806 major competitor apps |
| convenient | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 27,628 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 232 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 53 | 88 192,370 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,606 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 52 | 87 148,927 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,294 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 67,613 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 577 major competitor apps |
| tracking | 69 | 100 | 46 | 76 36,260 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 223 major competitor apps |
| track | 66 | 100 | 51 | 84 107,758 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 854 major competitor apps |
| create | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 117,926 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,227 major competitor apps |
| wait | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 9,421 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 104 major competitor apps |
| meet | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 26,603 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 293 major competitor apps |
| needed | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,417 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 60 major competitor apps |
| back | 69 | 100 | 46 | 76 36,816 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 397 major competitor apps |
| enter | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 24,164 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 204 major competitor apps |
| auto | 72 | 100 | 43 | 70 15,207 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 218 major competitor apps |
| home | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 51,812 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 629 major competitor apps |
| field | 72 | 100 | 41 | 69 12,918 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 46 major competitor apps |
| long | 70 | 100 | 45 | 75 29,728 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 259 major competitor apps |
App Description
Features:
Scoring is mostly automatic, all that is needed is to enter team places for the events.
Scoring ties can be auto calculated if the places are entered (this can really help simplify scoring high jump, pole vault, and multiple ties as those results can sometimes be tricky to calculate.
Meets are designed for tracking varsity and junior varsity results of both male and female teams.
Users can create a standard list of meet events that are typically used, create custom lists, or even make up new events as needed (Where else could one make the "Fat Man's Relay" an officially scored track event...although I personally don't recommend this)
The app works great offline in the press box. You could even share the results using bluetooth, or wait until a more convenient time while warming up back at home after a long cold night.