Salvavidas Estadístico
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 64 keywords for Salvavidas Estadístico in Apple App Store
Salvavidas Estadístico tracks 64 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 63 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.6, difficulty 43.7, best rank 81.
Tracked keywords
64
1 ranked • 63 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 81 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.6
Top keyword: books
Avg difficulty
43.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.5
books
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 104
- 63.8
logic
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 170
- 62.6
preparation
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 37.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 16
- 64.9
method
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 80
- 67.2
research
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 114
Unranked opportunities
books
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Competitors: 104
logic
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Competitors: 170
preparation
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 37.7 • Competitors: 16
method
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Competitors: 80
research
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 114
High competition keywords
find
Total apps: 149,900 • Major competitors: 2,796
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
best
Total apps: 124,586 • Major competitors: 2,642
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
information
Total apps: 121,649 • Major competitors: 1,140
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
simple
Total apps: 109,534 • Major competitors: 1,459
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.6
different
Total apps: 100,117 • Major competitors: 1,707
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| methodology | 69 | 100 | 38 | 47 682 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | 81 | 81 | 5 major competitor apps |
| best | 66 | 100 | 54 | 85 124,586 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,642 major competitor apps |
| health | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 43,584 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 541 major competitor apps |
| software | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 17,501 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 3.8 | — | — | 172 major competitor apps |
| order | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 66,456 competing apps Median installs: 444 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 801 major competitor apps |
| device | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 54,529 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 851 major competitor apps |
| step | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 42,115 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 644 major competitor apps |
| learn | 67 | 100 | 52 | 81 78,844 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,087 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 121,649 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,140 major competitor apps |
| control | 68 | 100 | 50 | 81 72,821 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 984 major competitor apps |
| find | 66 | 100 | 55 | 86 149,900 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,796 major competitor apps |
| basic | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 18,966 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 194 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 28,694 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 230 major competitor apps |
| test | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 42,097 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 714 major competitor apps |
| activity | 72 | 100 | 46 | 71 18,465 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 283 major competitor apps |
| researcher | 68 | 100 | 31 | 38 195 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5 major competitor apps |
| good | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 33,791 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 586 major competitor apps |
| simple | 66 | 100 | 52 | 84 109,534 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,459 major competitor apps |
| face | 71 | 100 | 46 | 72 22,713 competing apps Median installs: 900 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 543 major competitor apps |
| type | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 25,638 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 292 major competitor apps |
| fit | 72 | 100 | 45 | 71 17,644 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 342 major competitor apps |
| advanced | 69 | 100 | 49 | 79 54,174 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 761 major competitor apps |
| books | 73 | 100 | 41 | 65 8,672 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 104 major competitor apps |
| knowledge | 71 | 100 | 45 | 74 26,549 competing apps Median installs: 370 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 193 major competitor apps |
| choice | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 17,387 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 320 major competitor apps |
App Description
There is a very common difficulty among health professionals when analyzing the results obtained in a research procedure. The development of clinical activity and its preparation often makes it difficult to learn how to face methodological and statistical problems. At a teaching level, it is complex to develop the ability to perform mathematical logic analysis to face statistical problems, which requires time that is not compatible with clinical practice.
There are many manuals and books dedicated to this issue, as well as a great amount of mathematical software that allows the most complex operations to be carried out and high quantities of data to be handled. However, between the basic knowledge needed to analyze the data obtained in some experiments and the knowledge about advanced statistics and data handling, there is a gap that professionals often find insurmountable. Interacting in the world of information and interpreting it correctly is a basic process that every researcher must control in order to obtain correct conclusions that allow science to advance.
Thus, a method that facilitates the choice of the most appropriate statistical test for each situation is presented, allowing the researcherers to analyze their results without the need of having advanced mathematical or statistical training.
The objective of the physical device "Salvavidas Estadístico" and its app, is to provide a 3-step guide to carry out a bivariate analysis independently, applying the statistical concepts required in the different fields of science. Through the choice of the confrontation of two variables and the evaluation of their characteristics through 3 questions, the test that best suits each situation within a research study will be suggested, specifically in the analysis of results. Three questions are presented:
1: What kind of variables will be tested?
2: Is there a good fit to the normal distribution?
3: Are the variables paired?
After answering these three