ITS OnBoard Verify
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 47 keywords for ITS OnBoard Verify in Apple App Store
ITS OnBoard Verify tracks 47 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 47 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.7, difficulty 38.2.
Tracked keywords
47
0 ranked • 47 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.7
Top keyword: storage
Avg difficulty
38.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.4
storage
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 79
- 65.7
individuals
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 27
- 67.0
document
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 54
- 67.3
needed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 59
- 67.2
chance
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 197
Unranked opportunities
storage
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 79
individuals
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 27
document
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Competitors: 54
needed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 59
chance
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 197
High competition keywords
track
Total apps: 105,612 • Major competitors: 851
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.9
allows
Total apps: 80,814 • Major competitors: 303
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.5
including
Total apps: 68,848 • Major competitors: 789
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.3
control
Total apps: 64,050 • Major competitors: 487
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.6
complete
Total apps: 63,872 • Major competitors: 662
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| better | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 42,011 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 406 major competitor apps |
| storage | 73 | 100 | 40 | 66 9,167 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 79 major competitor apps |
| control | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 64,050 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 487 major competitor apps |
| working | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 19,553 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 120 major competitor apps |
| including | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 68,848 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 789 major competitor apps |
| tracking | 70 | 100 | 46 | 76 35,464 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 224 major competitor apps |
| crew members | 68 | 100 | 23 | 38 195 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
| audit | 70 | 100 | 31 | 52 1,185 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 6 major competitor apps |
| individuals | 73 | 100 | 40 | 66 8,388 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 27 major competitor apps |
| document | 73 | 100 | 40 | 67 9,948 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 54 major competitor apps |
| efficient | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 16,560 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 47 major competitor apps |
| track | 66 | 100 | 51 | 84 105,612 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 851 major competitor apps |
| complete | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 63,872 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 662 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 49 | 82 80,814 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 303 major competitor apps |
| needed | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,438 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 59 major competitor apps |
| work | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 54,827 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 457 major competitor apps |
| members | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 19,893 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 182 major competitor apps |
| chance | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,238 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 197 major competitor apps |
| tasks | 72 | 100 | 42 | 70 14,805 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 86 major competitor apps |
| perform | 73 | 100 | 41 | 68 11,758 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 58 major competitor apps |
| completed | 73 | 100 | 39 | 65 7,653 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 43 major competitor apps |
| space | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 20,814 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 195 major competitor apps |
| sometimes | 72 | 100 | 36 | 60 4,058 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 32 major competitor apps |
| issues | 73 | 100 | 40 | 67 10,126 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 48 major competitor apps |
| system | 69 | 100 | 46 | 77 40,132 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 176 major competitor apps |
App Description
Problems It Solves:
• Inefficient (sometimes inaccurate) paper system for assigning workers to jobs and for verifying, recording, and tracking worker qualifications to perform the needed job tasks
• Inability to track OQ and non-OQ individuals working on the job and SOC
• Inefficiencies on-site and in the office, replacing worktime with administration
• Storage and space issues from retaining paper records
Benefits and Value
• Better worker utilization, including the elimination of downtime
• Faster, more accurate, more complete, and more cost-efficient records retention and reporting
• Reduced chance of audit violations