ITS OnBoard Verify
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 47 keywords for ITS OnBoard Verify in Apple App Store
ITS OnBoard Verify tracks 47 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 47 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.7, difficulty 38.9.
Tracked keywords
47
0 ranked • 47 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.7
Top keyword: storage
Avg difficulty
38.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.5
storage
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 119
- 65.6
individuals
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 45
- 67.1
document
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 101
- 67.2
needed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 96
- 67.2
chance
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 302
Unranked opportunities
storage
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 119
individuals
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 45
document
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Competitors: 101
needed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 96
chance
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 302
High competition keywords
track
Total apps: 109,353 • Major competitors: 1,348
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.8
allows
Total apps: 80,365 • Major competitors: 543
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.6
including
Total apps: 67,999 • Major competitors: 1,239
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.7
complete
Total apps: 65,758 • Major competitors: 1,065
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.4
control
Total apps: 65,573 • Major competitors: 802
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| better | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 41,613 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 611 major competitor apps |
| storage | 73 | 100 | 43 | 67 9,468 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 119 major competitor apps |
| control | 68 | 100 | 50 | 81 65,573 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 802 major competitor apps |
| working | 71 | 100 | 46 | 72 19,940 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 216 major competitor apps |
| including | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 67,999 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,239 major competitor apps |
| tracking | 69 | 100 | 47 | 76 37,010 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 361 major competitor apps |
| crew members | 68 | 100 | 24 | 38 195 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 4 major competitor apps |
| audit | 70 | 100 | 31 | 52 1,227 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 9 major competitor apps |
| individuals | 73 | 100 | 40 | 66 8,306 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 45 major competitor apps |
| document | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 10,285 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 101 major competitor apps |
| efficient | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 16,876 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 86 major competitor apps |
| track | 66 | 100 | 52 | 84 109,353 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 1,348 major competitor apps |
| complete | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 65,758 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,065 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 50 | 82 80,365 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 543 major competitor apps |
| needed | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,337 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 96 major competitor apps |
| work | 68 | 100 | 49 | 79 56,073 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 738 major competitor apps |
| members | 71 | 100 | 47 | 72 19,782 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 276 major competitor apps |
| chance | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 10,324 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 302 major competitor apps |
| tasks | 72 | 100 | 42 | 70 14,666 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 143 major competitor apps |
| perform | 73 | 100 | 41 | 68 11,666 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 80 major competitor apps |
| completed | 73 | 100 | 39 | 65 7,579 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 66 major competitor apps |
| space | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 21,533 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 317 major competitor apps |
| sometimes | 72 | 100 | 37 | 60 4,025 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 62 major competitor apps |
| issues | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,051 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 76 major competitor apps |
| system | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 41,100 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 333 major competitor apps |
App Description
Problems It Solves:
• Inefficient (sometimes inaccurate) paper system for assigning workers to jobs and for verifying, recording, and tracking worker qualifications to perform the needed job tasks
• Inability to track OQ and non-OQ individuals working on the job and SOC
• Inefficiencies on-site and in the office, replacing worktime with administration
• Storage and space issues from retaining paper records
Benefits and Value
• Better worker utilization, including the elimination of downtime
• Faster, more accurate, more complete, and more cost-efficient records retention and reporting
• Reduced chance of audit violations