ASCCP Management Guidelines
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 58 keywords for ASCCP Management Guidelines in Apple App Store
ASCCP Management Guidelines tracks 58 keywords (3 keywords rank; 55 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.4, difficulty 38.7, best rank 61.
Tracked keywords
58
3 ranked • 55 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 61 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.4
Top keyword: navigation
Avg difficulty
38.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.8
navigation
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 66
- 65.8
individuals
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 25
- 64.7
tests
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 55
- 67.2
precise
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 67
- 65.0
streamline
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 23
Unranked opportunities
navigation
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 66
individuals
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 25
tests
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 55
precise
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Competitors: 67
streamline
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Competitors: 23
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 185,407 • Major competitors: 2,043
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.4
using
Total apps: 116,658 • Major competitors: 765
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3
based
Total apps: 81,069 • Major competitors: 582
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.7
including
Total apps: 69,233 • Major competitors: 744
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.3
complete
Total apps: 63,498 • Major competitors: 635
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| managing | 71 | 100 | 43 | 72 19,320 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | 61 | 61 | 80 major competitor apps |
| management | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 41,444 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | 212 | 212 | 141 major competitor apps |
| managed | 72 | 100 | 42 | 70 14,457 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | 232 | 232 | 224 major competitor apps |
| new | 65 | 100 | 53 | 88 185,407 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,043 major competitor apps |
| navigation | 73 | 100 | 41 | 68 11,041 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 66 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 116,658 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 765 major competitor apps |
| offer | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 31,382 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 354 major competitor apps |
| provide | 68 | 100 | 48 | 80 56,654 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 255 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 44 | 74 25,308 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 108 major competitor apps |
| including | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 69,233 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 744 major competitor apps |
| individuals | 73 | 100 | 40 | 66 8,457 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 25 major competitor apps |
| tests | 73 | 100 | 39 | 65 7,220 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 55 major competitor apps |
| complete | 68 | 100 | 49 | 80 63,498 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 635 major competitor apps |
| comprehensive | 70 | 100 | 46 | 76 34,433 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 120 major competitor apps |
| together | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 21,250 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 211 major competitor apps |
| precise | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,260 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 67 major competitor apps |
| future | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 31,285 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 207 major competitor apps |
| allow | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 24,216 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 139 major competitor apps |
| treat | 71 | 100 | 35 | 58 3,069 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 37 major competitor apps |
| streamline | 73 | 100 | 39 | 65 7,609 competing apps Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 23 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 50 | 82 81,069 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 582 major competitor apps |
| well | 69 | 100 | 47 | 78 44,340 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 252 major competitor apps |
| addition | 72 | 100 | 42 | 69 12,718 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 95 major competitor apps |
| developed | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 21,565 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 66 major competitor apps |
| results | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 21,899 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 111 major competitor apps |
App Description
ASCCP is pleased to offer this app to streamline navigation of the ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. The guidelines articles, as published in the Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, as well as the comprehensive risk estimates, can be accessed through https://www.asccp.org/guidelines.
These evidence-based management guidelines, initially developed in 2019, came together through a consensus process of 19 organizations. The updated management guidelines aim to:
• Allow for a more complete and precise estimation of risk
• Provide more appropriate intervention for high-risk individuals (detect and treat more precancer)
• Recommend less intervention for low-risk individuals (decrease testing and treatment that won’t prevent cancer and may cause reproductive harm)
• Allow for the future addition of new risk modifiers and screening and management technologies
See https://www.asccp.org/UserGuide for tips on using the app.