ASCCP Management Guidelines
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 58 keywords for ASCCP Management Guidelines in Apple App Store
ASCCP Management Guidelines tracks 58 keywords (3 keywords rank; 55 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 49.6, difficulty 39.9, best rank 61.
Tracked keywords
58
3 ranked • 55 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 61 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
49.6
Top keyword: new
Avg difficulty
39.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 91.1
new
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 2,341
- 60.6
managing
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Rank 61
Competitors: 78
- 66.3
management
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Rank 212
Competitors: 138
- 70.9
managed
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 47.7 • Rank 232
Competitors: 246
- 82.6
using
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 61.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 924
Unranked opportunities
new
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.9 • Competitors: 2,341
using
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 61.4 • Competitors: 924
offer
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 54.7 • Competitors: 352
provide
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.4 • Competitors: 293
process
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 122
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 10,701 • Major competitors: 2,341
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.9
using
Total apps: 4,473 • Major competitors: 924
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.4
including
Total apps: 3,880 • Major competitors: 926
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.0
may
Total apps: 3,755 • Major competitors: 871
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.6
based
Total apps: 3,039 • Major competitors: 697
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| managing | 58 | 100 | 42 | 61 479 competing apps Median installs: 237,250 Avg rating: 4.7 | 61 | 61 | 78 major competitor apps |
| management | 58 | 100 | 46 | 66 856 competing apps Median installs: 221,550 Avg rating: 4.6 | 212 | 212 | 138 major competitor apps |
| managed | 58 | 100 | 48 | 71 1,362 competing apps Median installs: 242,250 Avg rating: 4.6 | 232 | 232 | 246 major competitor apps |
| new | 59 | 100 | 64 | 91 10,701 competing apps Median installs: 270,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 2,341 major competitor apps |
| navigation | 57 | 100 | 45 | 56 309 competing apps Median installs: 256,500 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 66 major competitor apps |
| using | 58 | 100 | 61 | 83 4,473 competing apps Median installs: 247,200 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 924 major competitor apps |
| offer | 58 | 100 | 55 | 72 1,560 competing apps Median installs: 266,562 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 352 major competitor apps |
| provide | 58 | 100 | 49 | 73 1,667 competing apps Median installs: 243,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 293 major competitor apps |
| process | 58 | 100 | 45 | 63 624 competing apps Median installs: 224,238 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 122 major competitor apps |
| including | 58 | 100 | 62 | 81 3,880 competing apps Median installs: 285,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 926 major competitor apps |
| individuals | 57 | 100 | 34 | 52 196 competing apps Median installs: 221,938 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 31 major competitor apps |
| tests | 20 | 100 | 39 | 54 232 competing apps Median installs: 269,488 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 59 major competitor apps |
| complete | 58 | 100 | 52 | 78 2,946 competing apps Median installs: 253,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 625 major competitor apps |
| comprehensive | 58 | 100 | 46 | 66 795 competing apps Median installs: 206,650 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 126 major competitor apps |
| together | 58 | 100 | 53 | 69 1,115 competing apps Median installs: 261,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 249 major competitor apps |
| precise | 57 | 100 | 42 | 57 325 competing apps Median installs: 248,725 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 56 major competitor apps |
| future | 58 | 100 | 51 | 69 1,126 competing apps Median installs: 243,450 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 204 major competitor apps |
| allow | 58 | 100 | 50 | 65 749 competing apps Median installs: 265,875 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 160 major competitor apps |
| treat | 57 | 100 | 35 | 51 186 competing apps Median installs: 226,788 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 38 major competitor apps |
| streamline | 57 | 100 | 34 | 47 125 competing apps Median installs: 296,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 26 major competitor apps |
| based | 58 | 100 | 58 | 79 3,039 competing apps Median installs: 256,925 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 697 major competitor apps |
| well | 58 | 100 | 49 | 72 1,543 competing apps Median installs: 241,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 296 major competitor apps |
| addition | 58 | 100 | 48 | 59 420 competing apps Median installs: 230,875 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 100 major competitor apps |
| developed | 58 | 100 | 41 | 60 460 competing apps Median installs: 233,638 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 74 major competitor apps |
| results | 58 | 100 | 43 | 64 668 competing apps Median installs: 213,000 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 120 major competitor apps |
App Description
ASCCP is pleased to offer this app to streamline navigation of the ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. The guidelines articles, as published in the Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, as well as the comprehensive risk estimates, can be accessed through https://www.asccp.org/guidelines.
These evidence-based management guidelines, initially developed in 2019, came together through a consensus process of 19 organizations. The updated management guidelines aim to:
• Allow for a more complete and precise estimation of risk
• Provide more appropriate intervention for high-risk individuals (detect and treat more precancer)
• Recommend less intervention for low-risk individuals (decrease testing and treatment that won’t prevent cancer and may cause reproductive harm)
• Allow for the future addition of new risk modifiers and screening and management technologies
See https://www.asccp.org/UserGuide for tips on using the app.