ESC CVD Risk Calculation
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 75 keywords for ESC CVD Risk Calculation in Apple App Store
ESC CVD Risk Calculation tracks 75 keywords (4 keywords rank; 71 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.5, difficulty 38.9, best rank 28.
Tracked keywords
75
4 ranked • 71 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 28 • Latest leader 50
Avg opportunity
70.5
Top keyword: risk
Avg difficulty
38.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.2
risk
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Rank 50
Competitors: 87
- 63.2
collaboration
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 60
- 67.7
source
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 110
- 64.1
university
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 28
- 66.8
healthcare
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 83
Unranked opportunities
collaboration
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Competitors: 60
source
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 110
university
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Competitors: 28
healthcare
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 83
patient
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 33
High competition keywords
features
Total apps: 126,027 • Major competitors: 2,126
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
designed
Total apps: 113,960 • Major competitors: 1,088
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4
data
Total apps: 97,683 • Major competitors: 1,018
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
available
Total apps: 95,747 • Major competitors: 1,852
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.5
support
Total apps: 83,360 • Major competitors: 1,121
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cardiovascular | 70 | 100 | 31 | 50 971 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | 28 | 28 | 7 major competitor apps |
| risk | 73 | 100 | 41 | 65 8,380 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | 50 | 50 | 87 major competitor apps |
| preventive | 70 | 100 | 30 | 47 697 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | 112 | 112 | 9 major competitor apps |
| calculations | 72 | 100 | 37 | 61 4,414 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.1 | 132 | 131 | 25 major competitor apps |
| online | 68 | 100 | 52 | 81 73,709 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,306 major competitor apps |
| collaboration | 73 | 100 | 44 | 63 6,341 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 60 major competitor apps |
| source | 73 | 100 | 43 | 68 11,748 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 110 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 51 | 82 83,360 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,121 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 67,154 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,305 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 45 | 71 19,938 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 194 major competitor apps |
| medical | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 21,735 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 143 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 51 | 84 113,960 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,088 major competitor apps |
| content | 68 | 100 | 52 | 79 60,391 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 953 major competitor apps |
| educational | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 24,490 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 209 major competitor apps |
| connection | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 28,276 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 423 major competitor apps |
| available | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 95,747 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,852 major competitor apps |
| provide | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 55,830 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 560 major competitor apps |
| university | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 7,171 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 28 major competitor apps |
| various | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 48,723 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 729 major competitor apps |
| healthcare | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,417 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 83 major competitor apps |
| provides | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 72,525 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 568 major competitor apps |
| patient | 73 | 100 | 39 | 65 7,649 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 33 major competitor apps |
| powered | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 23,642 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 304 major competitor apps |
| center | 72 | 100 | 44 | 69 15,100 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 203 major competitor apps |
| upon | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,733 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 176 major competitor apps |
App Description
1. SCORE2
2. SCORE2-OP
3. SCORE2-Diabetes
4. ASCVD
5. SMART
6. SMART-REACH*
7. DIAL*
8. LIFE-CVD*
* Available online on U-Prevent (Internet connection required)
The ESC CVD Risk Calculation App is available in English. It provides guidance to the most adapted calculator for your patient, and provides an estimation of cardiovascular risk. Of note, patient data are not stored in the App.
This application is only for informative use and is not intended to provide therapeutic support or diagnosis assistance.
This Application is powered by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), based upon the source codes of the U-Prevent webtool, a concept developed by University Medical Center Utrecht, redesigned and owned by ORTEC.
The SCORE2, SCORE2-OP and SCORE2-Diabetes calculators were developed in collaboration with the ESC Cardiovascular Risk Collaboration unit.
The Application has recently been updated in the framework of the EAPC IMPLEMENT Programme (2023) which was supported by Novo Nordisk in the form of an educational grant. The sponsor did not have any involvement or influence on the features nor on the scientific content within the Application.