ESC CVD Risk Calculation
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 71 keywords for ESC CVD Risk Calculation in Apple App Store
ESC CVD Risk Calculation tracks 71 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 71 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 49.3, difficulty 37.5.
Tracked keywords
71
0 ranked • 71 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
49.3
Top keyword: features
Avg difficulty
37.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 83.9
features
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,060
- 78.6
online
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 59.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 689
- 77.7
support
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 515
- 80.8
within
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 56.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 740
- 60.8
individual
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 101
Unranked opportunities
features
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.4 • Competitors: 1,060
online
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 59.0 • Competitors: 689
support
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.8 • Competitors: 515
within
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 56.2 • Competitors: 740
individual
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.5 • Competitors: 101
High competition keywords
features
Total apps: 5,134 • Major competitors: 1,060
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.4
available
Total apps: 4,074 • Major competitors: 979
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.5
within
Total apps: 3,722 • Major competitors: 740
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.2
designed
Total apps: 3,407 • Major competitors: 624
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.8
based
Total apps: 3,039 • Major competitors: 697
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| online | 58 | 100 | 59 | 79 2,997 competing apps Median installs: 268,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 689 major competitor apps |
| collaboration | 20 | 100 | 53 | 46 102 competing apps Median installs: 425,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 26 major competitor apps |
| source | 57 | 100 | 42 | 57 317 competing apps Median installs: 194,725 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 54 major competitor apps |
| support | 58 | 100 | 56 | 78 2,741 competing apps Median installs: 233,950 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 515 major competitor apps |
| within | 58 | 100 | 56 | 81 3,722 competing apps Median installs: 259,688 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 740 major competitor apps |
| individual | 58 | 100 | 45 | 61 489 competing apps Median installs: 247,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 101 major competitor apps |
| medical | 58 | 100 | 39 | 59 418 competing apps Median installs: 192,125 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 60 major competitor apps |
| designed | 58 | 100 | 54 | 80 3,407 competing apps Median installs: 230,000 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 624 major competitor apps |
| content | 58 | 100 | 57 | 76 2,368 competing apps Median installs: 245,025 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 481 major competitor apps |
| educational | 58 | 100 | 42 | 62 571 competing apps Median installs: 207,750 Avg rating: 4.5 | — | — | 96 major competitor apps |
| connection | 58 | 100 | 49 | 68 990 competing apps Median installs: 280,788 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 223 major competitor apps |
| available | 58 | 100 | 64 | 82 4,074 competing apps Median installs: 282,412 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 979 major competitor apps |
| provide | 58 | 100 | 49 | 73 1,667 competing apps Median installs: 243,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 293 major competitor apps |
| university | 57 | 100 | 31 | 41 67 competing apps Median installs: 211,800 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 11 major competitor apps |
| various | 58 | 100 | 50 | 75 2,177 competing apps Median installs: 229,325 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 374 major competitor apps |
| healthcare | 57 | 100 | 39 | 52 203 competing apps Median installs: 233,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 36 major competitor apps |
| provides | 58 | 100 | 49 | 74 1,846 competing apps Median installs: 221,075 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 308 major competitor apps |
| patient | 57 | 100 | 30 | 45 94 competing apps Median installs: 207,600 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 14 major competitor apps |
| powered | 58 | 100 | 51 | 67 897 competing apps Median installs: 294,275 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 216 major competitor apps |
| center | 58 | 100 | 47 | 62 552 competing apps Median installs: 240,312 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 107 major competitor apps |
| upon | 58 | 100 | 41 | 62 570 competing apps Median installs: 215,925 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 98 major competitor apps |
| internet | 58 | 100 | 52 | 71 1,413 competing apps Median installs: 229,725 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 285 major competitor apps |
| influence | 57 | 100 | 31 | 46 111 competing apps Median installs: 183,375 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 19 major competitor apps |
| calculation | 20 | 100 | 33 | 42 70 competing apps Median installs: 268,688 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 18 major competitor apps |
| includes | 58 | 100 | 49 | 70 1,252 competing apps Median installs: 237,900 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 246 major competitor apps |
App Description
1. SCORE2
2. SCORE2-OP
3. SCORE2-Diabetes
4. ASCVD
5. SMART
6. SMART-REACH*
7. DIAL*
8. LIFE-CVD*
* Available online on U-Prevent (Internet connection required)
The ESC CVD Risk Calculation App is available in English. It provides guidance to the most adapted calculator for your patient, and provides an estimation of cardiovascular risk. Of note, patient data are not stored in the App.
This application is only for informative use and is not intended to provide therapeutic support or diagnosis assistance.
This Application is powered by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), based upon the source codes of the U-Prevent webtool, a concept developed by University Medical Center Utrecht, redesigned and owned by ORTEC.
The SCORE2, SCORE2-OP and SCORE2-Diabetes calculators were developed in collaboration with the ESC Cardiovascular Risk Collaboration unit.
The Application has recently been updated in the framework of the EAPC IMPLEMENT Programme (2023) which was supported by Novo Nordisk in the form of an educational grant. The sponsor did not have any involvement or influence on the features nor on the scientific content within the Application.