Dry Visit - Baiae
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 76 keywords for Dry Visit - Baiae in Apple App Store
Dry Visit - Baiae tracks 76 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 76 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.7, difficulty 37.9.
Tracked keywords
76
0 ranked • 76 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.7
Top keyword: la
Avg difficulty
37.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.3
la
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 87
- 68.5
series
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 257
- 64.8
located
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 45
- 68.0
project
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 95
- 64.6
due
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 103
Unranked opportunities
la
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 87
series
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Competitors: 257
located
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Competitors: 45
project
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 95
due
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 103
High competition keywords
information
Total apps: 121,649 • Major competitors: 1,140
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
data
Total apps: 97,683 • Major competitors: 1,018
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
see
Total apps: 92,680 • Major competitors: 1,758
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.2
explore
Total apps: 67,919 • Major competitors: 1,354
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.0
within
Total apps: 67,154 • Major competitors: 1,305
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| story | 72 | 100 | 45 | 71 18,048 competing apps Median installs: 850 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 406 major competitor apps |
| software | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 17,501 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 3.8 | — | — | 172 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 67,154 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,305 major competitor apps |
| innovation | 72 | 100 | 36 | 58 3,279 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 37 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 121,649 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,140 major competitor apps |
| permission | 72 | 100 | 39 | 58 2,948 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 57 major competitor apps |
| built | 71 | 100 | 45 | 74 26,973 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 258 major competitor apps |
| town | 72 | 100 | 44 | 62 5,071 competing apps Median installs: 756 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 129 major competitor apps |
| la | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 11,104 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 87 major competitor apps |
| provide | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 55,830 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 560 major competitor apps |
| special | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 48,122 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,056 major competitor apps |
| listen | 70 | 100 | 49 | 74 27,415 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 343 major competitor apps |
| virtual | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 24,447 competing apps Median installs: 528 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 478 major competitor apps |
| explore | 68 | 100 | 53 | 80 67,919 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,354 major competitor apps |
| series | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 13,149 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 257 major competitor apps |
| le | 72 | 100 | 38 | 60 4,316 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 19 major competitor apps |
| city | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 23,226 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 373 major competitor apps |
| located | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 7,919 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 45 major competitor apps |
| part | 70 | 100 | 48 | 74 29,306 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 408 major competitor apps |
| imperial | 71 | 100 | 32 | 53 1,611 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 13 major competitor apps |
| see | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 92,680 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,758 major competitor apps |
| ever | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 23,087 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 534 major competitor apps |
| became | 71 | 100 | 32 | 53 1,611 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 8 major competitor apps |
| project | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 12,359 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 95 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 52 | 83 97,683 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,018 major competitor apps |
App Description
In Roman times it was a fashionable resort city with a thermal spa located over natural volcanic vents, in the centre of the Gulf of Pozzuoli. The Roman elite built luxurious villas there from late republic to roman imperial period, but part of the town became submerged in the sea due to bradyseismic activity. Nowadays, most of villas lie at the bottom of the shallow waters of the bay.
Thanks to the iMARECULTURE project, you can explore the ruins of Villa con ingresso a Protiro, composed of a series of rooms with a central atrium to provide them with light. Within these rooms there are some wonderful mosaics. During the virtual exploration you will be able to listen some information about the structures, and activate the hypothetical reconstruction and see how the villa appeared in Roman times.
Disclaimer: the iMARECULTURE project (http://www.imareculture.eu) has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 727153.
The permission to publish data (3D of the site, 3D findings and photos/videos) has been granted by the Ministero per i Beni e le attività Culturali e per il Turismo (MIBACT) - Istituto Superiore per la Conservazione e il Restauro (ISCR). The 3D reconstruction of the seabed has been produced by NAUMACOS. The hypothetical 3D reconstruction has been produced by 3D Research Srl and Ministero per i Beni e le attività Culturali e per il Turismo (MIBACT) - Istituto Superiore per la Conservazione e il Restauro (ISCR). A special thanks to Parco Archeologico Campi Flegrei. A special thanks to Barbara Davidde Petriaggi and Roberto Petriaggi. Software developed by 3D Research Srl