Wound Capture
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 102 keywords for Wound Capture in Apple App Store
Wound Capture tracks 102 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 102 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.0, difficulty 41.7.
Tracked keywords
102
0 ranked • 102 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.0
Top keyword: immediate
Avg difficulty
41.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.7
immediate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 82
- 64.0
patient
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 33
- 65.0
provider
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 101
- 67.8
calculate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 87
- 64.8
streamline
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 45
Unranked opportunities
immediate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Competitors: 82
patient
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Competitors: 33
provider
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Competitors: 101
calculate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 87
streamline
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Competitors: 45
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 190,736 • Major competitors: 2,966
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
access
Total apps: 163,515 • Major competitors: 2,635
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
make
Total apps: 159,506 • Major competitors: 2,928
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
help
Total apps: 150,250 • Major competitors: 2,451
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
download
Total apps: 123,090 • Major competitors: 2,027
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| download | 66 | 100 | 54 | 85 123,090 competing apps Median installs: 411 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,027 major competitor apps |
| try | 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 41,039 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 943 major competitor apps |
| device | 69 | 100 | 50 | 79 50,271 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 843 major competitor apps |
| make | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 159,506 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,928 major competitor apps |
| via | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 56,889 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 760 major competitor apps |
| whether | 67 | 100 | 52 | 83 89,814 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,087 major competitor apps |
| connected | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 34,135 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 452 major competitor apps |
| images | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 28,390 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 313 major competitor apps |
| range | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 37,834 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 559 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 67,459 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,296 major competitor apps |
| digital | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 46,511 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 703 major competitor apps |
| used | 69 | 100 | 49 | 79 50,682 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 502 major competitor apps |
| save | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 85,036 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,597 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 115,141 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,548 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 55 | 88 190,736 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,966 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 120,211 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,593 major competitor apps |
| provide | 68 | 100 | 49 | 79 55,996 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 558 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 150,250 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,451 major competitor apps |
| width | 70 | 100 | 30 | 49 870 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 5 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 25,749 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 226 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 163,515 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,635 major competitor apps |
| patients | 72 | 100 | 38 | 62 5,417 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 36 major competitor apps |
| enterprise | 72 | 100 | 36 | 59 3,291 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 17 major competitor apps |
| immediate | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 7,373 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 82 major competitor apps |
| view | 67 | 100 | 52 | 83 97,553 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,290 major competitor apps |
App Description
The average time range spent on patient wound documentation takes about 20-40-60 minutes depending on the complications, number of wounds, measurement using rulers, acetate tracing, digital cameras and then download and digital upload into the patient record into an EMR.
Wound capture app will help the provider or patient to identify the body location of the wound, help calculate dimensions of width and length using AR ruler, make notes, select & review previous images of the patients wound from the mobile device and be able to upload the data into the patient's record on any EMR with one click. Trend analysis gives real-time view of predictability of the wound progress (based on past history of images of the same wound).
Core Features Include:
To streamline the wound monitoring process with an all in one device producing a comprehensive wound assessment record with minimal time required by providers.
To provide thorough, progressive and subjective wound assessments and trend analysis based on past history.
To identify early infection of the wound or surrounding tissues, with quality images, calculations and provider notes.
To provide enterprise access whether used within inpatient or outpatient settings connected to your EMR via FHIR/HL7 API's.
ARKit and ML Core are used for wound measurement and trend analysis of wound healing process.
Turn your 20-60 min workflow to less than 5 mins with immediate mobile capture and upload and we try to help providers with 53% annual savings by changing your workflow, you can save up to $600,000 / yr in labor costs.