UmbiCalc
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 49 keywords for UmbiCalc in Apple App Store
UmbiCalc tracks 49 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 49 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.3, difficulty 37.9.
Tracked keywords
49
0 ranked • 49 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.3
Top keyword: healthcare
Avg difficulty
37.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.1
healthcare
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 36
- 64.9
provider
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 54
- 64.7
method
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 37
- 66.9
intended
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 63
- 67.1
advice
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 58
Unranked opportunities
healthcare
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Competitors: 36
provider
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Competitors: 54
method
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Competitors: 37
intended
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Competitors: 63
advice
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Competitors: 58
High competition keywords
using
Total apps: 116,658 • Major competitors: 765
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3
based
Total apps: 81,069 • Major competitors: 582
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.7
provides
Total apps: 73,576 • Major competitors: 257
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.0
personal
Total apps: 68,468 • Major competitors: 627
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.1
current
Total apps: 67,023 • Major competitors: 728
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| care | 70 | 100 | 45 | 75 28,820 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 254 major competitor apps |
| range | 69 | 100 | 46 | 77 37,302 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 273 major competitor apps |
| medical | 71 | 100 | 43 | 72 18,735 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 54 major competitor apps |
| educational | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 21,829 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 97 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 116,658 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 765 major competitor apps |
| wide range | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 16,148 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 112 major competitor apps |
| healthcare | 73 | 100 | 40 | 66 8,742 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 36 major competitor apps |
| accurate | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 23,279 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 142 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 49 | 82 73,576 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 257 major competitor apps |
| provider | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 7,485 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 54 major competitor apps |
| current | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 67,023 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 728 major competitor apps |
| personal | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 68,468 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 627 major competitor apps |
| always | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 53,710 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 549 major competitor apps |
| advanced | 69 | 100 | 47 | 78 46,068 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 362 major competitor apps |
| across | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 46,591 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 553 major competitor apps |
| length | 72 | 100 | 38 | 63 5,431 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 32 major competitor apps |
| statistical | 70 | 100 | 31 | 52 1,194 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| sample | 72 | 100 | 36 | 60 3,676 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 12 major competitor apps |
| algorithm | 72 | 100 | 37 | 61 4,204 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 26 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 50 | 82 81,069 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 582 major competitor apps |
| delivery | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 21,306 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 190 major competitor apps |
| method | 73 | 100 | 39 | 65 7,209 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 37 major competitor apps |
| et | 71 | 100 | 34 | 57 2,592 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 6 major competitor apps |
| practice | 70 | 100 | 45 | 75 30,148 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 177 major competitor apps |
| birth | 71 | 100 | 33 | 55 2,014 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 20 major competitor apps |
App Description
UmbiCalc is based on the algorithm described by Tambasco et al. in “A Novel and Accurate Method for Estimating Umbilical Arterial and Venous Catheter Insertion Length.” Journal of Perinatology 2021. The algorithm was derived from statistical modeling using a representative sample of the current NICU population and validated across a wide range of birth weights.
Intended for use by neonatologists, pediatricians, and advanced practice providers for personal educational purposes only. It is not intended for use in clinical practice or the delivery of medical care. Always consult with a healthcare provider for advice concerning your health.