UmbiCalc
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 49 keywords for UmbiCalc in Apple App Store
UmbiCalc tracks 49 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 49 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 51.3, difficulty 37.9.
Tracked keywords
49
0 ranked • 49 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
51.3
Top keyword: care
Avg difficulty
37.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 69.9
care
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 262
- 70.5
range
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 48.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 261
- 59.3
medical
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 60
- 62.4
educational
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 96
- 82.6
using
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 61.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 924
Unranked opportunities
care
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.2 • Competitors: 262
range
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 48.4 • Competitors: 261
medical
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Competitors: 60
educational
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Competitors: 96
using
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 61.4 • Competitors: 924
High competition keywords
using
Total apps: 4,473 • Major competitors: 924
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.4
current
Total apps: 3,863 • Major competitors: 756
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.3
based
Total apps: 3,039 • Major competitors: 697
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7
personal
Total apps: 2,753 • Major competitors: 641
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.2
always
Total apps: 2,705 • Major competitors: 630
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| care | 58 | 100 | 49 | 70 1,236 competing apps Median installs: 259,912 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 262 major competitor apps |
| range | 58 | 100 | 48 | 71 1,314 competing apps Median installs: 239,262 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 261 major competitor apps |
| medical | 58 | 100 | 39 | 59 418 competing apps Median installs: 192,125 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 60 major competitor apps |
| educational | 58 | 100 | 42 | 62 571 competing apps Median installs: 207,750 Avg rating: 4.5 | — | — | 96 major competitor apps |
| using | 58 | 100 | 61 | 83 4,473 competing apps Median installs: 247,200 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 924 major competitor apps |
| wide range | 58 | 100 | 44 | 62 557 competing apps Median installs: 234,250 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 106 major competitor apps |
| healthcare | 57 | 100 | 39 | 52 203 competing apps Median installs: 233,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 36 major competitor apps |
| accurate | 58 | 100 | 46 | 66 792 competing apps Median installs: 240,225 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 140 major competitor apps |
| provides | 58 | 100 | 49 | 74 1,846 competing apps Median installs: 221,075 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 308 major competitor apps |
| provider | 57 | 100 | 50 | 56 313 competing apps Median installs: 231,175 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 60 major competitor apps |
| current | 58 | 100 | 56 | 81 3,863 competing apps Median installs: 255,000 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 756 major competitor apps |
| personal | 58 | 100 | 59 | 78 2,753 competing apps Median installs: 266,950 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 641 major competitor apps |
| always | 58 | 100 | 56 | 78 2,705 competing apps Median installs: 275,550 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 630 major competitor apps |
| advanced | 58 | 100 | 52 | 74 1,839 competing apps Median installs: 239,250 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 345 major competitor apps |
| across | 20 | 100 | 63 | 77 2,646 competing apps Median installs: 290,838 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 672 major competitor apps |
| length | 57 | 100 | 36 | 54 243 competing apps Median installs: 211,450 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 34 major competitor apps |
| statistical | 56 | 100 | 19 | 30 21 competing apps Median installs: 154,050 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| sample | 57 | 100 | 36 | 42 74 competing apps Median installs: 235,662 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 11 major competitor apps |
| algorithm | 57 | 100 | 32 | 49 147 competing apps Median installs: 263,250 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 26 major competitor apps |
| based | 58 | 100 | 58 | 79 3,039 competing apps Median installs: 256,925 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 697 major competitor apps |
| delivery | 20 | 100 | 68 | 63 608 competing apps Median installs: 415,725 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 201 major competitor apps |
| method | 57 | 100 | 39 | 52 199 competing apps Median installs: 242,575 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 41 major competitor apps |
| et | 20 | 100 | 43 | 30 20 competing apps Median installs: 555,450 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 8 major competitor apps |
| practice | 58 | 100 | 45 | 67 896 competing apps Median installs: 227,288 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 167 major competitor apps |
| birth | 57 | 100 | 34 | 46 109 competing apps Median installs: 256,275 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 21 major competitor apps |
App Description
UmbiCalc is based on the algorithm described by Tambasco et al. in “A Novel and Accurate Method for Estimating Umbilical Arterial and Venous Catheter Insertion Length.” Journal of Perinatology 2021. The algorithm was derived from statistical modeling using a representative sample of the current NICU population and validated across a wide range of birth weights.
Intended for use by neonatologists, pediatricians, and advanced practice providers for personal educational purposes only. It is not intended for use in clinical practice or the delivery of medical care. Always consult with a healthcare provider for advice concerning your health.