UmbiCalc
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 49 keywords for UmbiCalc in Apple App Store
UmbiCalc tracks 49 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 49 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.3, difficulty 38.6.
Tracked keywords
49
0 ranked • 49 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.3
Top keyword: healthcare
Avg difficulty
38.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.2
healthcare
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 73
- 65.0
provider
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 93
- 64.7
method
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 68
- 66.7
intended
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 103
- 67.2
advice
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 96
Unranked opportunities
healthcare
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 73
provider
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Competitors: 93
method
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 68
intended
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 103
advice
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 96
High competition keywords
using
Total apps: 115,143 • Major competitors: 1,301
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.3
based
Total apps: 79,669 • Major competitors: 938
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.3
provides
Total apps: 72,728 • Major competitors: 477
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.2
personal
Total apps: 71,141 • Major competitors: 1,058
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.2
current
Total apps: 68,541 • Major competitors: 1,281
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| care | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 29,576 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 463 major competitor apps |
| range | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 37,834 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 476 major competitor apps |
| medical | 71 | 100 | 43 | 72 19,341 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 118 major competitor apps |
| educational | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 22,308 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 172 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 115,143 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,301 major competitor apps |
| wide range | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 16,391 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 194 major competitor apps |
| healthcare | 73 | 100 | 40 | 66 9,068 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 73 major competitor apps |
| accurate | 71 | 100 | 45 | 74 24,710 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 275 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 49 | 81 72,728 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 477 major competitor apps |
| provider | 73 | 100 | 42 | 65 7,679 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 93 major competitor apps |
| current | 68 | 100 | 50 | 81 68,541 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,281 major competitor apps |
| personal | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 71,141 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 1,058 major competitor apps |
| always | 68 | 100 | 49 | 79 52,770 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 891 major competitor apps |
| advanced | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 48,179 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 634 major competitor apps |
| across | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 45,489 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 857 major competitor apps |
| length | 72 | 100 | 38 | 63 5,589 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 69 major competitor apps |
| statistical | 70 | 100 | 31 | 52 1,223 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 5 major competitor apps |
| sample | 72 | 100 | 37 | 60 3,730 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 18 major competitor apps |
| algorithm | 72 | 100 | 37 | 61 4,320 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 45 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 50 | 82 79,669 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 938 major competitor apps |
| delivery | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 22,286 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 308 major competitor apps |
| method | 73 | 100 | 39 | 65 7,334 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 68 major competitor apps |
| et | 71 | 100 | 35 | 57 2,616 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 8 major competitor apps |
| practice | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 31,145 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 283 major competitor apps |
| birth | 71 | 100 | 34 | 56 2,073 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 37 major competitor apps |
App Description
UmbiCalc is based on the algorithm described by Tambasco et al. in “A Novel and Accurate Method for Estimating Umbilical Arterial and Venous Catheter Insertion Length.” Journal of Perinatology 2021. The algorithm was derived from statistical modeling using a representative sample of the current NICU population and validated across a wide range of birth weights.
Intended for use by neonatologists, pediatricians, and advanced practice providers for personal educational purposes only. It is not intended for use in clinical practice or the delivery of medical care. Always consult with a healthcare provider for advice concerning your health.