TTAP : delay gone deep
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 117 keywords for TTAP : delay gone deep in Apple App Store
TTAP : delay gone deep tracks 117 keywords (3 keywords rank; 114 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 69.9, difficulty 39.9, best rank 11.
Tracked keywords
117
3 ranked • 114 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 11 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.9
Top keyword: seconds
Avg difficulty
39.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.8
seconds
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 181
- 63.0
musical
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 110
- 68.0
second
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 234
- 67.3
jump
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 355
- 62.6
unit
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 72
Unranked opportunities
seconds
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 181
musical
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Competitors: 110
second
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 234
jump
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Competitors: 355
unit
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.3 • Competitors: 72
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 189,069 • Major competitors: 4,102
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.6
like
Total apps: 153,430 • Major competitors: 4,517
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
features
Total apps: 126,080 • Major competitors: 2,934
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
information
Total apps: 121,666 • Major competitors: 1,490
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.2
using
Total apps: 114,205 • Major competitors: 2,209
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| delay | 71 | 100 | 36 | 57 2,642 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | 11 | 11 | 51 major competitor apps |
| experimental | 70 | 100 | 30 | 48 798 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.3 | 52 | 52 | 13 major competitor apps |
| latency | 70 | 100 | 33 | 49 907 competing apps Median installs: 725 Avg rating: 4.1 | 59 | 59 | 39 major competitor apps |
| right | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 90,095 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,210 major competitor apps |
| try | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 43,287 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,337 major competitor apps |
| whether | 67 | 100 | 51 | 82 88,779 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 1,483 major competitor apps |
| audio | 70 | 100 | 47 | 76 34,895 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 618 major competitor apps |
| graphical | 71 | 100 | 34 | 56 2,250 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 15 major competitor apps |
| section | 72 | 100 | 42 | 69 14,192 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 171 major competitor apps |
| classic | 70 | 100 | 47 | 74 27,374 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 1,054 major competitor apps |
| digital | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 52,338 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,006 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 45 | 71 19,938 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 267 major competitor apps |
| analog | 71 | 100 | 34 | 54 1,666 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 45 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 121,666 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,490 major competitor apps |
| control | 68 | 100 | 50 | 81 72,879 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,396 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 114,205 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,209 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 55 | 88 189,069 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 4,102 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 28,703 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 333 major competitor apps |
| virtual | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 24,462 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 653 major competitor apps |
| speed | 70 | 100 | 47 | 74 28,442 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 756 major competitor apps |
| ios | 70 | 100 | 47 | 76 34,927 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 646 major competitor apps |
| run | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 24,072 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 695 major competitor apps |
| seconds | 73 | 100 | 41 | 66 9,096 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 181 major competitor apps |
| text | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 44,111 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 931 major competitor apps |
| click | 71 | 100 | 45 | 74 26,626 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 444 major competitor apps |
App Description
*** Please note: TTAP is an Audio Unit extension (AUv3) – it only works in an AUv3 host app like Garageband, AUM, Cubasis, Modstep, Beatmaker 3, etc... ***
HOW IT WORKS / DESCRIPTION
TTAP is a delay with two buffers. Each buffer features extensive controls for shaping the envelope of the delay sound, with another control set for glitchy pre-feedback repeats and warm pitch-bends.
Inspired by both the classic sounds of tape delays and by experiments in editing and splicing tape, TTAP features a dedicated Section control for determining the maximum length of time of the second buffer. Section also acts as a virtual LFO control, affecting a number of modulation parameters.
Both the Delay Time and Section controls in TTAP can either be synced to your DAW, or run free, providing up to 3.0 seconds of time for each. Try changing the speed while TTAP is running with high feedback for the expanding/contracting doppler sound familiar to any dub lover (or automate and randomize the process using the Bend control).
—
In The Fade
Fade easily between two delay buffers, or jump to using one buffer exclusively with the click of a button.
Glitch and Chance
In addition to the familiar feedback control, TTAP includes controls for randomized Repeats (synced to the Section time) for a glitchier sound. In addition, each of the buffers features a dedicated Reverse switch.
Intuitive Display
In addition to control positions, the animations in TTAP give you essential information such as the mix between buffers, amount of feedback, time gap between buffers, and the envelope for each buffer.
Go By Feel
As part of encouraging more musical and creative applications of WOV, in addition to using symbols for controls, the controls in WOV do not have individual readouts. We encourage you to let your ears determine the right knob positions whenever you can! If you’d like a precise readout, however, you can see/edit it by clicking on any parameter and looking in the upper-right corner of WOV.
Icons
By default, all labels are graphical – for text labels, click the symbols/text label switch