Clinical Nest
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 44 keywords for Clinical Nest in Apple App Store
Clinical Nest tracks 44 keywords (2 keywords rank; 42 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.4, difficulty 40.4, best rank 12.
Tracked keywords
44
2 ranked • 42 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 12 • Latest leader 106
Avg opportunity
70.4
Top keyword: clinical
Avg difficulty
40.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 62.9
clinical
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.3 • Rank 106
Competitors: 26
- 66.8
healthcare
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 83
- 64.6
patient
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 33
- 67.5
monitoring
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 99
- 63.8
preferences
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 115
Unranked opportunities
healthcare
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 83
patient
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 33
monitoring
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 99
preferences
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Competitors: 115
purpose
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Competitors: 50
High competition keywords
help
Total apps: 162,218 • Major competitors: 2,474
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
experience
Total apps: 135,689 • Major competitors: 2,190
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.0
best
Total apps: 124,558 • Major competitors: 2,643
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
including
Total apps: 67,637 • Major competitors: 1,399
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.9
service
Total apps: 61,173 • Major competitors: 846
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| effectiveness | 71 | 100 | 34 | 53 1,441 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | 12 | 12 | 10 major competitor apps |
| clinical | 73 | 100 | 38 | 63 6,086 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | 106 | 87 | 26 major competitor apps |
| best | 66 | 100 | 54 | 85 124,558 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,643 major competitor apps |
| care | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 32,581 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 527 major competitor apps |
| experience | 66 | 100 | 54 | 85 135,689 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,190 major competitor apps |
| needs | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 25,940 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 314 major competitor apps |
| service | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 61,173 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 846 major competitor apps |
| provide | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 55,848 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 560 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 162,218 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,474 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 28,686 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 230 major competitor apps |
| including | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 67,637 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,399 major competitor apps |
| services | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 42,284 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 529 major competitor apps |
| healthcare | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,414 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 83 major competitor apps |
| effective | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 17,932 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 146 major competitor apps |
| quality | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 58,822 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 786 major competitor apps |
| patient | 73 | 100 | 39 | 65 7,647 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 33 major competitor apps |
| improve | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 45,056 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 633 major competitor apps |
| part | 70 | 100 | 48 | 74 29,311 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 409 major competitor apps |
| achieve | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 18,360 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 240 major competitor apps |
| monitoring | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 11,520 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 99 major competitor apps |
| preferences | 73 | 100 | 41 | 64 6,875 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 115 major competitor apps |
| purpose | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 7,258 competing apps Median installs: 305 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 50 major competitor apps |
| line | 72 | 100 | 45 | 71 19,149 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 337 major competitor apps |
| improving | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 8,384 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 121 major competitor apps |
| essential | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 23,843 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 225 major competitor apps |
App Description
Clinical effectiveness is defined as "the application of the best knowledge, derived from research, clinical experience, and patient preferences to achieve optimum processes and outcomes of care for patients. The process involves a framework of informing, changing, and monitoring practice."
Clinical effectiveness is about improving a patients' total experience of healthcare and is an essential part of improving and assuring quality. The aim is to use evidence to improve the effectiveness of clinical practice and service delivery.