OCS-Plus

Developer: University of Oxford

Category: Medical

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 59 keywords for OCS-Plus in Apple App Store

Developer: University of Oxford Category: medical

OCS-Plus tracks 59 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 59 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 48.2, difficulty 42.4.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 59 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

48.2

Top keyword: easy

Avg difficulty

42.4

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

easy

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,246
85.2
health

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 307
70.9
focus

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 179
66.9
version

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 182
67.9
age

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 88
60.5

Unranked opportunities

easy

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.0 • Competitors: 1,246
health

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.3 • Competitors: 307
focus

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Competitors: 179
version

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.6 • Competitors: 182
age

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 88

High competition keywords

easy

Total apps: 5,849 • Major competitors: 1,246

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.0
automatically

Total apps: 4,092 • Major competitors: 815

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.8
multiple

Total apps: 2,846 • Major competitors: 550

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.5
data

Total apps: 2,494 • Major competitors: 472

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.6
provides

Total apps: 1,846 • Major competitors: 308

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.1

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
health	58	100	51	71 1,361 competing apps Median installs: 248,675 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	307 major competitor apps
collaboration	20	100	53	46 102 competing apps Median installs: 425,400 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	26 major competitor apps
focus	58	100	47	67 906 competing apps Median installs: 231,512 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	179 major competitor apps
version	58	100	46	68 1,006 competing apps Median installs: 238,775 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	182 major competitor apps
order	20	100	61	73 1,756 competing apps Median installs: 288,212 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	456 major competitor apps
easy	59	100	59	85 5,849 competing apps Median installs: 250,625 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	1,246 major competitor apps
age	58	100	41	61 474 competing apps Median installs: 229,175 Avg rating: 4.5	—	—	88 major competitor apps
multiple	58	100	54	78 2,846 competing apps Median installs: 239,425 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	550 major competitor apps
university	57	100	31	41 67 competing apps Median installs: 211,800 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	11 major competitor apps
group	58	100	60	64 695 competing apps Median installs: 244,600 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	151 major competitor apps
tests	20	100	39	54 232 competing apps Median installs: 269,488 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	59 major competitor apps
provides	58	100	49	74 1,846 competing apps Median installs: 221,075 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	308 major competitor apps
tool	58	100	47	69 1,134 competing apps Median installs: 210,275 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	170 major competitor apps
contains	58	100	41	62 570 competing apps Median installs: 217,262 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	97 major competitor apps
plus	20	100	53	67 947 competing apps Median installs: 342,375 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	264 major competitor apps
professionals	57	100	37	53 227 competing apps Median installs: 245,750 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	42 major competitor apps
performance	58	100	43	63 623 competing apps Median installs: 242,325 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	113 major competitor apps
required	58	100	51	64 665 competing apps Median installs: 263,050 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	143 major competitor apps
screen	58	100	55	73 1,748 competing apps Median installs: 253,888 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	360 major competitor apps
professional	58	100	49	70 1,261 competing apps Median installs: 250,825 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	225 major competitor apps
provided	58	100	45	61 515 competing apps Median installs: 271,325 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	109 major competitor apps
data	58	100	55	77 2,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,338 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	472 major competitor apps
assessment	20	100	34	40 56 competing apps Median installs: 493,512 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	18 major competitor apps
standard	58	100	43	62 541 competing apps Median installs: 259,950 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	114 major competitor apps
currently	57	100	58	59 403 competing apps Median installs: 212,525 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	76 major competitor apps

App Description

OCS-Plus provides health professionals with a brief cognitive assessment focussed on memory and executive attention. OCS-Plus was developed by the Translational Neuropsychology Research Group at the University of Oxford. The tool has been standardised, normed and validated (Demeyere et al 2021). The tool is currently undergoing further research for validity of use in specific clinical groups.

The tool is not for self-assessment. Instead, a health professional assessor administers the screen to respondents to investigate domain-general cognitive impairments, with a specific focus on memory and executive attention. The tool contains multiple easy to administer tests and instructions are provided for each test. Normative data is provided for three age groups : under 60, between 60 and 70, and older than 70 and respondent performance is automatically compared to established normative cut offs.

In order to activate the app for use, registration is required. There is no cost for the standard app version where data is not uploaded. Where data upload is required, an administration fee, as well as a collaboration agreement and datasharing agreement is required to be put in place.