OCS-Plus

Developer: University of Oxford

Category: Medical

Add App to Comparison

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 59 keywords for OCS-Plus in Apple App Store

Developer: University of Oxford Category: medical

OCS-Plus tracks 59 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 59 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.6, difficulty 40.1.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 59 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.6

Top keyword: age

Avg difficulty

40.1

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

age

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 118
66.3
university

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 12
64.0
tests

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 64
64.5
professionals

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 40
68.7
currently

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 69
66.8

Unranked opportunities

age

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Competitors: 118
university

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Competitors: 12
tests

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 64
professionals

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 40
currently

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 69

High competition keywords

easy

Total apps: 142,722 • Major competitors: 1,308

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.1
data

Total apps: 86,098 • Major competitors: 608

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.9
provides

Total apps: 73,026 • Major competitors: 321

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.0
multiple

Total apps: 68,031 • Major competitors: 677

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.9
automatically

Total apps: 62,712 • Major competitors: 850

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.7

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
health	69	100	47	77 39,002 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	353 major competitor apps
collaboration	72	100	38	63 5,559 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	33 major competitor apps
focus	70	100	45	75 30,668 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	229 major competitor apps
version	70	100	45	75 29,503 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	226 major competitor apps
order	68	100	49	80 59,972 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	524 major competitor apps
easy	65	100	52	86 142,722 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,308 major competitor apps
age	73	100	40	66 9,179 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	118 major competitor apps
multiple	68	100	49	81 68,031 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	677 major competitor apps
university	73	100	39	64 6,659 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	12 major competitor apps
group	71	100	45	73 23,336 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	196 major competitor apps
tests	73	100	39	64 7,110 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	64 major competitor apps
provides	67	100	49	81 73,026 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	321 major competitor apps
tool	69	100	47	78 48,311 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	215 major competitor apps
contains	71	100	43	71 18,287 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	101 major competitor apps
plus	72	100	43	70 15,047 competing apps Median installs: 175 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	308 major competitor apps
professionals	73	100	41	69 12,761 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	40 major competitor apps
performance	71	100	44	73 24,124 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	145 major competitor apps
required	71	100	43	72 18,893 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	147 major competitor apps
screen	69	100	47	77 42,174 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	445 major competitor apps
professional	69	100	47	78 43,054 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	297 major competitor apps
provided	71	100	43	72 19,160 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	107 major competitor apps
data	67	100	50	83 86,098 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	608 major competitor apps
assessment	72	100	36	59 3,534 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	21 major competitor apps
standard	72	100	42	70 15,656 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	137 major competitor apps
currently	73	100	41	67 9,771 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	69 major competitor apps

App Description

OCS-Plus provides health professionals with a brief cognitive assessment focussed on memory and executive attention. OCS-Plus was developed by the Translational Neuropsychology Research Group at the University of Oxford. The tool has been standardised, normed and validated (Demeyere et al 2021). The tool is currently undergoing further research for validity of use in specific clinical groups.

The tool is not for self-assessment. Instead, a health professional assessor administers the screen to respondents to investigate domain-general cognitive impairments, with a specific focus on memory and executive attention. The tool contains multiple easy to administer tests and instructions are provided for each test. Normative data is provided for three age groups : under 60, between 60 and 70, and older than 70 and respondent performance is automatically compared to established normative cut offs.

In order to activate the app for use, registration is required. There is no cost for the standard app version where data is not uploaded. Where data upload is required, an administration fee, as well as a collaboration agreement and datasharing agreement is required to be put in place.