OCS-Plus

Category: Medical

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 59 keywords for OCS-Plus in Apple App Store

Developer: University of Oxford Category: medical

OCS-Plus tracks 59 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 58 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.9, difficulty 41.4, best rank 181.

Tracked keywords

1 ranked • 58 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank 181 • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.9

Top keyword: collaboration

Avg difficulty

41.4

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

collaboration

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 75
63.2
age

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 270
66.4
university

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 39
64.1
tests

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 119
64.0
professionals

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 86
68.2

Unranked opportunities

collaboration

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Competitors: 75
age

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 270
university

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 39
tests

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Competitors: 119
professionals

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 86

High competition keywords

easy

Total apps: 141,334 • Major competitors: 2,839

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.8
data

Total apps: 97,788 • Major competitors: 1,437

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
multiple

Total apps: 76,457 • Major competitors: 1,636

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.4
provides

Total apps: 72,456 • Major competitors: 812

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.1
order

Total apps: 66,470 • Major competitors: 1,035

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.0

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
cognitive	72	100	38	61 4,967 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2	181	181	117 major competitor apps
health	69	100	48	77 43,601 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	725 major competitor apps
collaboration	73	100	44	63 6,343 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	75 major competitor apps
focus	70	100	47	76 35,365 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	532 major competitor apps
version	70	100	46	75 31,002 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	575 major competitor apps
order	68	100	51	80 66,470 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	1,035 major competitor apps
easy	66	100	53	86 141,334 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,839 major competitor apps
age	73	100	43	66 9,916 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	270 major competitor apps
multiple	68	100	50	81 76,457 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,636 major competitor apps
university	73	100	40	64 7,176 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	39 major competitor apps
group	71	100	49	73 25,669 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	424 major competitor apps
tests	73	100	39	64 7,040 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	119 major competitor apps
provides	68	100	49	81 72,456 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	812 major competitor apps
tool	69	100	48	79 53,520 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	554 major competitor apps
contains	72	100	43	71 18,151 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	248 major competitor apps
plus	72	100	46	70 16,110 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	612 major competitor apps
professionals	73	100	41	68 12,628 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	86 major competitor apps
performance	70	100	45	74 28,070 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	359 major competitor apps
required	72	100	44	71 18,688 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	310 major competitor apps
screen	69	100	50	77 45,360 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,078 major competitor apps
professional	69	100	48	78 49,702 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	788 major competitor apps
provided	72	100	44	71 19,013 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	228 major competitor apps
data	67	100	51	83 97,788 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,437 major competitor apps
assessment	72	100	37	60 3,978 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	36 major competitor apps
standard	72	100	43	70 17,369 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	325 major competitor apps

App Description

OCS-Plus provides health professionals with a brief cognitive assessment focussed on memory and executive attention. OCS-Plus was developed by the Translational Neuropsychology Research Group at the University of Oxford. The tool has been standardised, normed and validated (Demeyere et al 2021). The tool is currently undergoing further research for validity of use in specific clinical groups.

The tool is not for self-assessment. Instead, a health professional assessor administers the screen to respondents to investigate domain-general cognitive impairments, with a specific focus on memory and executive attention. The tool contains multiple easy to administer tests and instructions are provided for each test. Normative data is provided for three age groups : under 60, between 60 and 70, and older than 70 and respondent performance is automatically compared to established normative cut offs.

In order to activate the app for use, registration is required. There is no cost for the standard app version where data is not uploaded. Where data upload is required, an administration fee, as well as a collaboration agreement and datasharing agreement is required to be put in place.