Raybench: OS system speed test
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 58 keywords for Raybench: OS system speed test in Apple App Store
Raybench: OS system speed test tracks 58 keywords (4 keywords rank; 54 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 69.8, difficulty 39.4, best rank 17.
Tracked keywords
58
4 ranked • 54 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 17 • Latest leader 103
Avg opportunity
69.8
Top keyword: fastest
Avg difficulty
39.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.6
fastest
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank 103
Competitors: 138
- 68.0
task
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 109
- 67.8
second
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 166
- 66.1
charge
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 194
- 65.4
result
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 81
Unranked opportunities
task
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Competitors: 109
second
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Competitors: 166
charge
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Competitors: 194
result
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 81
huge
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Competitors: 382
High competition keywords
like
Total apps: 143,203 • Major competitors: 3,240
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.6
using
Total apps: 115,141 • Major competitors: 1,548
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
simple
Total apps: 98,968 • Major competitors: 1,441
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.6
different
Total apps: 95,103 • Major competitors: 1,687
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.5
even
Total apps: 81,181 • Major competitors: 1,850
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.2
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| smooth performance | 68 | 100 | 28 | 41 263 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.3 | 17 | 17 | 5 major competitor apps |
| operating system | 69 | 100 | 29 | 46 569 competing apps Median installs: 850 Avg rating: 4.0 | 34 | 28 | 15 major competitor apps |
| os | 72 | 100 | 40 | 61 4,538 competing apps Median installs: 800 Avg rating: 4.1 | 37 | 37 | 52 major competitor apps |
| fastest | 73 | 100 | 41 | 64 6,340 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1 | 103 | 103 | 138 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 52,042 competing apps Median installs: 583 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,181 major competitor apps |
| version | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 29,567 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 378 major competitor apps |
| device | 69 | 100 | 50 | 79 50,271 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 843 major competitor apps |
| image | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 25,919 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 297 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 115,141 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,548 major competitor apps |
| never | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 67,216 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,245 major competitor apps |
| task | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 11,628 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 109 major competitor apps |
| picture | 71 | 100 | 46 | 72 19,636 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 312 major competitor apps |
| test | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 38,610 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 710 major competitor apps |
| many | 67 | 100 | 51 | 82 77,117 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,352 major competitor apps |
| good | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 32,154 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 580 major competitor apps |
| simple | 67 | 100 | 52 | 84 98,968 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,441 major competitor apps |
| second | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 11,305 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 166 major competitor apps |
| performance | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 24,352 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 243 major competitor apps |
| like | 65 | 100 | 56 | 86 143,203 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,240 major competitor apps |
| charge | 73 | 100 | 42 | 66 8,893 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 194 major competitor apps |
| different | 67 | 100 | 53 | 83 95,103 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,687 major competitor apps |
| important | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 44,405 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 512 major competitor apps |
| understand | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 26,359 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 236 major competitor apps |
| changed | 71 | 100 | 35 | 58 2,931 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 28 major competitor apps |
| algorithm | 72 | 100 | 38 | 61 4,320 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 51 major competitor apps |
App Description
This is a good test for the processor and the operating system itself.
The processor, like a combine, grinds huge volumes of the same mathematical operations, and the operating system distributes threads and loads.
It is important to understand that a device running different operating systems can behave differently. The result may also depend on the charge level, heating level and the version of the operating system installed on the device.
The algorithm of this benchmark has not changed and will never change, so that the result can be compared even with the most ancient device.
https://static.macflash.ru/PRIVACY_POLICY_EN
https://static.macflash.ru/TERMS_OF_USE_EN