Thermal Efficiency Calculator
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 37 keywords for Thermal Efficiency Calculator in Apple App Store
Thermal Efficiency Calculator tracks 37 keywords (4 keywords rank; 33 need traction). Key metrics: 25% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.6, difficulty 39.6, best rank 10.
Tracked keywords
37
4 ranked • 33 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
25%
Best rank 10 • Latest leader 10
Avg opportunity
70.6
Top keyword: efficiency
Avg difficulty
39.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.7
efficiency
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Rank 10
Competitors: 38
- 62.7
efficiently
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.0 • Rank 26
Competitors: 35
- 68.7
energy
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 174
- 63.2
fuel
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 144
- 62.2
temperature
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 78
Unranked opportunities
energy
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Competitors: 174
fuel
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 144
temperature
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Competitors: 78
savings
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Competitors: 195
please contact
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Competitors: 96
High competition keywords
help
Total apps: 162,218 • Major competitors: 2,474
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
using
Total apps: 114,667 • Major competitors: 1,563
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.1
us
Total apps: 80,364 • Major competitors: 1,549
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.0
contact
Total apps: 63,345 • Major competitors: 752
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.0
please
Total apps: 56,196 • Major competitors: 985
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| efficiency | 73 | 100 | 39 | 65 7,755 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | 10 | 10 | 38 major competitor apps |
| efficiently | 73 | 100 | 38 | 63 5,942 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | 26 | 26 | 35 major competitor apps |
| efficient | 71 | 100 | 44 | 71 19,509 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | 30 | 28 | 116 major competitor apps |
| thermal | 70 | 100 | 30 | 48 791 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 3.8 | 84 | 84 | 9 major competitor apps |
| contact | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 63,345 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 752 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 114,667 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,563 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 162,218 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,474 major competitor apps |
| visit | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 31,630 competing apps Median installs: 502 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 695 major competitor apps |
| oxygen | 70 | 100 | 31 | 50 967 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 15 major competitor apps |
| monitor | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 34,229 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 376 major competitor apps |
| improve | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 45,056 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 633 major competitor apps |
| please | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 56,196 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 985 major competitor apps |
| website | 72 | 100 | 43 | 70 15,971 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 162 major competitor apps |
| enter | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 23,938 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 394 major competitor apps |
| calculation | 72 | 100 | 38 | 62 5,171 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 31 major competitor apps |
| stack | 72 | 100 | 39 | 60 3,806 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 94 major competitor apps |
| calculated | 72 | 100 | 35 | 57 2,725 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 25 major competitor apps |
| energy | 73 | 100 | 42 | 69 13,578 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 174 major competitor apps |
| potential | 72 | 100 | 43 | 70 16,428 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 183 major competitor apps |
| calculates | 72 | 100 | 35 | 58 3,108 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 25 major competitor apps |
| gas | 72 | 100 | 40 | 59 3,726 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 92 major competitor apps |
| fuel | 73 | 100 | 40 | 63 6,302 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 144 major competitor apps |
| temperature | 73 | 100 | 39 | 62 5,486 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 3.8 | — | — | 78 major competitor apps |
| reducing | 72 | 100 | 37 | 60 3,909 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 34 major competitor apps |
| basis | 72 | 100 | 37 | 59 3,520 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 51 major competitor apps |
App Description
The thermal efficiency is calculated using the LHV basis of the fuel gas. It is a simplified calculation and you do not need to enter the fuel gas composition. It also indicates the energy savings potential of your heater. You can use it to monitor your heaters and improve their efficiency by reducing flue gas temperature and excess Oxygen needed.
Our company, Furnace Improvements Services, can help you realize the energy savings potential of your heater. Please contact us at info@heatflux.com and visit our website at www.heatflux.com.