Adaptive
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 33 keywords for Adaptive in Apple App Store
Adaptive tracks 33 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 32 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 49.5, difficulty 43.3, best rank 80.
Tracked keywords
33
1 ranked • 32 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 80 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
49.5
Top keyword: make
Avg difficulty
43.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 88.4
make
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,773
- 88.7
time
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,805
- 86.9
every
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,637
- 60.3
accessible
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank 80
Competitors: 115
- 74.7
better
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 450
Unranked opportunities
make
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.7 • Competitors: 1,773
time
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Competitors: 1,805
every
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.5 • Competitors: 1,637
better
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.5 • Competitors: 450
users
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.5 • Competitors: 430
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 8,391 • Major competitors: 1,805
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.9
make
Total apps: 8,094 • Major competitors: 1,773
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.7
every
Total apps: 6,989 • Major competitors: 1,637
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.5
automatically
Total apps: 4,092 • Major competitors: 815
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.8
much
Total apps: 2,669 • Major competitors: 569
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| accessible | 58 | 100 | 43 | 60 464 competing apps Median installs: 296,838 Avg rating: 4.7 | 80 | 80 | 115 major competitor apps |
| make | 59 | 100 | 63 | 88 8,094 competing apps Median installs: 266,850 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,773 major competitor apps |
| better | 58 | 100 | 53 | 75 2,000 competing apps Median installs: 250,162 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 450 major competitor apps |
| users | 58 | 100 | 52 | 75 1,979 competing apps Median installs: 259,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 430 major competitor apps |
| service | 58 | 100 | 54 | 75 2,023 competing apps Median installs: 255,675 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 419 major competitor apps |
| time | 59 | 100 | 63 | 89 8,391 competing apps Median installs: 259,600 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,805 major competitor apps |
| requests | 57 | 100 | 48 | 52 202 competing apps Median installs: 200,438 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 31 major competitor apps |
| special | 20 | 100 | 56 | 76 2,373 competing apps Median installs: 290,375 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 598 major competitor apps |
| services | 58 | 100 | 54 | 69 1,093 competing apps Median installs: 293,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 272 major competitor apps |
| every user | 56 | 96 | 18 | 26 13 competing apps Median installs: 262,475 Avg rating: 4.5 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| trip | 20 | 100 | 52 | 61 483 competing apps Median installs: 258,050 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 123 major competitor apps |
| much | 58 | 100 | 55 | 77 2,669 competing apps Median installs: 241,125 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 569 major competitor apps |
| every | 59 | 100 | 62 | 87 6,989 competing apps Median installs: 280,925 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,637 major competitor apps |
| user | 58 | 100 | 52 | 77 2,498 competing apps Median installs: 242,250 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 453 major competitor apps |
| services offered | 20 | 96 | 56 | 26 13 competing apps Median installs: 525,150 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 6 major competitor apps |
| review | 58 | 100 | 50 | 67 898 competing apps Median installs: 236,888 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 183 major competitor apps |
| automatically | 58 | 100 | 57 | 82 4,092 competing apps Median installs: 257,862 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 815 major competitor apps |
| offered | 20 | 100 | 48 | 56 291 competing apps Median installs: 348,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 75 major competitor apps |
| freedom | 57 | 100 | 42 | 55 283 competing apps Median installs: 250,175 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 49 major competitor apps |
| resulting | 57 | 100 | 24 | 36 39 competing apps Median installs: 171,700 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 3 major competitor apps |
| routes | 57 | 100 | 38 | 50 163 competing apps Median installs: 231,125 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 27 major competitor apps |
| leaving | 57 | 100 | 49 | 54 244 competing apps Median installs: 315,688 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 60 major competitor apps |
| requirements | 57 | 100 | 33 | 46 105 competing apps Median installs: 229,975 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 16 major competitor apps |
| adapted | 57 | 100 | 30 | 44 84 competing apps Median installs: 235,850 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 16 major competitor apps |
| less | 58 | 100 | 54 | 62 567 competing apps Median installs: 297,650 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 130 major competitor apps |
App Description
Users of the service can place, modify or review their trip requests through the App (or by a call) and routes are suggested automatically to the Driver, having considered the special requirements of every user (i.e. wheelchair adapted seats, time for entering/leaving the vehicle, etc.). This permits users to make requests much less in advance, resulting in a better service and greater freedom of movement.