Per Gram Calculator
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 44 keywords for Per Gram Calculator in Apple App Store
Per Gram Calculator tracks 44 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 44 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 46.8, difficulty 41.8.
Tracked keywords
44
0 ranked • 44 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
46.8
Top keyword: free
Avg difficulty
41.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 89.9
free
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 2,147
- 85.2
easy
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,246
- 86.3
find
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,481
- 83.3
see
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 64.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,122
- 73.9
change
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 400
Unranked opportunities
free
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.5 • Competitors: 2,147
easy
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.0 • Competitors: 1,246
find
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.8 • Competitors: 1,481
see
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 64.7 • Competitors: 1,122
change
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.7 • Competitors: 400
High competition keywords
free
Total apps: 9,480 • Major competitors: 2,147
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.5
find
Total apps: 6,521 • Major competitors: 1,481
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.8
easy
Total apps: 5,849 • Major competitors: 1,246
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.0
see
Total apps: 4,836 • Major competitors: 1,122
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.7
different
Total apps: 4,440 • Major competitors: 823
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| free | 59 | 100 | 63 | 90 9,480 competing apps Median installs: 264,750 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 2,147 major competitor apps |
| change | 58 | 100 | 54 | 74 1,855 competing apps Median installs: 267,450 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 400 major competitor apps |
| price | 58 | 100 | 52 | 70 1,277 competing apps Median installs: 301,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 316 major competitor apps |
| easy | 59 | 100 | 59 | 85 5,849 competing apps Median installs: 250,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,246 major competitor apps |
| find | 59 | 100 | 64 | 86 6,521 competing apps Median installs: 264,850 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,481 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 58 | 100 | 54 | 78 2,846 competing apps Median installs: 239,425 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 550 major competitor apps |
| volume | 57 | 100 | 42 | 55 259 competing apps Median installs: 186,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 45 major competitor apps |
| products | 20 | 100 | 58 | 67 928 competing apps Median installs: 325,375 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 263 major competitor apps |
| many | 58 | 100 | 55 | 81 3,804 competing apps Median installs: 252,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 758 major competitor apps |
| easily | 58 | 100 | 61 | 80 3,352 competing apps Median installs: 262,062 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 764 major competitor apps |
| allows | 58 | 100 | 50 | 75 2,119 competing apps Median installs: 225,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 351 major competitor apps |
| see | 59 | 100 | 65 | 83 4,836 competing apps Median installs: 287,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,122 major competitor apps |
| enter | 58 | 100 | 51 | 67 943 competing apps Median installs: 278,125 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 220 major competitor apps |
| length | 57 | 100 | 36 | 54 243 competing apps Median installs: 211,450 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 34 major competitor apps |
| meters | 56 | 100 | 22 | 33 27 competing apps Median installs: 350,800 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 3 major competitor apps |
| units | 57 | 100 | 34 | 51 188 competing apps Median installs: 220,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 26 major competitor apps |
| calculate | 57 | 100 | 39 | 52 203 competing apps Median installs: 194,625 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 41 major competitor apps |
| weight | 58 | 100 | 41 | 59 425 competing apps Median installs: 235,600 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 87 major competitor apps |
| two | 58 | 100 | 49 | 70 1,253 competing apps Median installs: 238,750 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 249 major competitor apps |
| different | 58 | 100 | 56 | 82 4,440 competing apps Median installs: 240,525 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 823 major competitor apps |
| number | 58 | 100 | 54 | 73 1,666 competing apps Median installs: 249,538 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 332 major competitor apps |
| per | 58 | 100 | 48 | 70 1,201 competing apps Median installs: 242,550 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 246 major competitor apps |
| automatically | 58 | 100 | 57 | 82 4,092 competing apps Median installs: 257,862 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 815 major competitor apps |
| cheaper | 56 | 100 | 33 | 35 36 competing apps Median installs: 557,600 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 9 major competitor apps |
| included | 57 | 100 | 44 | 58 353 competing apps Median installs: 222,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 74 major competitor apps |
App Description
You can easily calculate which one is cheaper when weight and price are different in shopping.
You can find the lowest price by calculating the price per gram and the weight per yen for multiple products with different weight and price.
You can change the notation of gram into the number of pieces, and change into units of length and volume such as meters and liters.
You can easily change the notation of the weight per 1 gram or 100 gram, and conversely the weight per 1 yen, making it easy to see which is cheaper.
If you enter two or more, the input fields will automatically increase, so you can compare as many as you want.
Blanks are excluded from the comparison, so unnecessary columns will not be included in the comparison if you remove the weight or amount.