EXFO RFTM

Developer: EXFO Inc.

Category: Productivity

Add App to Comparison

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 51 keywords for EXFO RFTM in Apple App Store

Developer: EXFO Inc. Category: productivity

EXFO RFTM tracks 51 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 51 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.7, difficulty 41.5.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 51 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.7

Top keyword: tests

Avg difficulty

41.5

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

tests

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 117
64.0
hub

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 64
62.2
unit

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 72
62.6
route

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 172
66.3
monitoring

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 130
67.5

Unranked opportunities

tests

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Competitors: 117
hub

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.3 • Competitors: 64
unit

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.3 • Competitors: 72
route

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.4 • Competitors: 172
monitoring

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 130

High competition keywords

mobile

Total apps: 130,363 • Major competitors: 2,094

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.1
using

Total apps: 114,205 • Major competitors: 2,209

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.7
designed

Total apps: 113,449 • Major competitors: 1,552

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3
even

Total apps: 80,510 • Major competitors: 2,574

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.2
including

Total apps: 67,298 • Major competitors: 1,875

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
mode	70	100	48	76 38,097 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,012 major competitor apps
live	68	100	52	80 67,140 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,617 major competitor apps
used	69	100	48	78 50,381 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	693 major competitor apps
designed	66	100	51	84 113,449 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,552 major competitor apps
using	66	100	53	84 114,205 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,209 major competitor apps
mobile	66	100	53	85 130,363 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,094 major competitor apps
including	68	100	51	80 67,298 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,875 major competitor apps
various	69	100	48	78 48,581 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,134 major competitor apps
monitor	70	100	46	75 34,270 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	507 major competitor apps
test	69	100	48	77 42,165 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	964 major competitor apps
tests	73	100	39	64 7,022 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	117 major competitor apps
type	71	100	45	73 25,687 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	440 major competitor apps
hub	73	100	38	62 5,478 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	64 major competitor apps
tone	72	100	38	60 4,181 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	104 major competitor apps
unit	73	100	38	63 5,799 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	72 major competitor apps
route	73	100	43	66 9,691 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	172 major competitor apps
solution	70	100	45	74 29,671 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	262 major competitor apps
remote	72	100	43	70 15,814 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 3.8	—	—	282 major competitor apps
main	71	100	44	72 22,628 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	350 major competitor apps
field	72	100	42	69 14,248 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	126 major competitor apps
monitoring	73	100	42	68 11,549 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	130 major competitor apps
loss	73	100	39	63 5,991 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	170 major competitor apps
even	67	100	52	82 80,510 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,574 major competitor apps
turn	69	100	51	78 50,692 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,689 major competitor apps
operate	72	100	36	60 3,881 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 3.8	—	—	47 major competitor apps

App Description

This application serves as a mobile client for EXFO RFTM, an optical fiber test and monitoring solution using an intelligent OTDR which you can operate on premises or through the EXFO cloud server.

The EXFO RFTM solution is designed to build, turn up, and monitor any type of fiber network, including point-to-point and PON links.

This mobile application is the field extension of EXFO RFTM. It is used by field technicians and engineers to execute various tests from an OTDR unit installed in a fixed and central location.

Testing supports running end-to-end loss tests on PONs in an FTTP context and runs the remote OTDR in tone mode on the selected route for fiber identification, even in live fiber conditions.

Field technicians can also use the app to fully characterize the distribution fibers connecting a main hub or cabinet to premises from the remote iOLM test unit.